Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01425 | Registry Identifier | BASEC |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Cereneo AG | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Rehabilitation engineering laboratory (RELab) at the ETH Zurich is recruiting participants with a motor function deficit for studying a novel non-invasive brain stimulation method that may be a promising approach for benefiting motor recovery after conditions like stroke, traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury. The study will be conducted at the cereneo Hertenstein clinic. Participants with residual motor function deficit due to stroke or spine/brain injury will be undergoing typical neurorehabilitation procedures in addition to the use of the automatically controlled non-invasive Vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS).
This study will analyze the feasibility of this method before it can be used by doctors generally. More specifically, this study aims to test whether controlling taVNS with a wearable wrist-worn sensor during rehabilitation exercises for movement is both practical and safe. This stimulation works by involves sending tiny electric pulses to the outside of the ear after the wrist sensor detects movement. These pulses activate the auricular Vagus nerve and in turn the brain. Over the course of multiple rehabilitation procedures, taVNS may to help with the speed of motor recovery as shown with previous, manually controlled studies. The goal of this study is wants to see if the automatically controlled taVNSs method works well and doesn't cause any harm while people are doing their therapy exercises. If successful, in the future it could offer a new way to improve the recovery process movement for people with motor difficulties.
Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) has emerged as a safe and medically approved non-invasive method for stimulating the vagus nerve, utilising a small electrode placed on the outer ear to transcutaneously activate an auricular branch of the vagus nerve. Studies indicate the potential benefits of both invasive and non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation for motor neurorehabilitation, particularly when combined with rehabilitation exercises. A recent pilot study has shown that pairing motor rehabilitation with taVNS in a movement-gated system resulted in improvement on Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper extremity scores and a greater effect size compared to an unpaired taVNS, while administering fewer stimulation pulses. This demonstrates that taVNS paired with movement therapy can reduce the intensity of stimulation, while still producing beneficial results. However, current approaches for performing stimulation during movement require either manual control or complex and non-specific sensor setup. There are no options for tracking and controlling stimulation based on movement kinematics in an objective, unsupervised manner. Therefore, an in-house developed taVNS system will be used (SmartVNS). The system includes inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensors to track patient's movement and then automatically initiates the taVNS stimulation during movements.
The benefit for participants in the study involving transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) paired with rehabilitation exercises outweighs the potential risks. The intervention, taVNS, is a medically approved procedure with minimal and extremely rare adverse effects, particularly when used within approved parameters. The study protocol ensures that taVNS will be administered at safe and tolerable intensity levels, with immediate removal of electrodes if any discomfort occurs. Additionally, the intervention will not alter the typical rehabilitation program of the participants, and motion-triggered taVNS will be while participants perform repetitive rehabilitation exercise movements with the affected limb. The potential benefits of the study include contributing to the quality of future neurorehabilitation outcomes and informing decisions for protocols in future clinical studies to explore the efficacy of taVNS in enhancing neurorehabilitation and motor learning in adults with motor deficits. Overall, the study aims to prioritise participant safety while offering the potential for meaningful therapeutic benefits.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intervention | Experimental | Patients undergoing prescribed neurorehabilitation therapy with additional intervention of movement-evoked auricular Vagus nerve stimulation. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Movement-evoked transcutaneous auricular Vagus nerve stimulation | Device | Intervention requires wearing of an inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor on an affected upper limb together with a transcutaneous auricular Vagus nerve (taVNS) stimulator on an outer ear on the contralateral side. Intervention involves IMU measurement-evoked initiation of taVNS during conventional neurorehabilitation therapy that is defined by the patient's doctor and therapist. Typically this is around 60 minutes/day of 50-300 repetitive upper limb movements targeting specific deficits such as flexor synergies and/or wrist, triceps or shoulder activation. taVNS intensity is calibrated at the start of every neurorehabilitation session by the patient to the maximal comfortable level with instructions to avoid pain or any serious discomfort. Patient is always accompanied by a therapist trained in the use of taVNS and the device is easy to immediately remove should any discomfort occur. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility of automatic movement-initiated taVNS | Perceived feasibility of automatic movement-initiated taVNS, assessed through validated questionnaires. This includes subjective ratings on ease of use, comfort, and perceived effects by therapists and patients. Questionnaires include: UMUX, IMI and UE. | From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 or at 4 weeks with an additional follow-up at 1 week after |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility of automatic movement detection during therapy | Agreement between manual movement detection by therapists and automatic sensor-triggered stimulation timings, based on ground-truth video recording, assessing technical feasibility. | On the first and last sessions of the study at weeks 1 and 2 or 4. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cereneo Hertenstein | Weggis | 6353 | Switzerland |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 37209010 | Background | Badran BW, Peng X, Baker-Vogel B, Hutchison S, Finetto P, Rishe K, Fortune A, Kitchens E, O'Leary GH, Short A, Finetto C, Woodbury ML, Kautz S. Motor Activated Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation as a Potential Neuromodulation Approach for Post-Stroke Motor Rehabilitation: A Pilot Study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2023 Jun;37(6):374-383. doi: 10.1177/15459683231173357. Epub 2023 May 20. | |
| 37646161 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not planned.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Date | Date Unknown |
|---|---|---|
| Release | Apr 22, 2026 | |
| Reset | May 15, 2026 |
Not provided
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2026 | May 15, 2026 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Tolerance and safety |
Recording incidences of adverse events and subjective unstructured feedback. |
| From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 or at 4 weeks. |
| Motor deficit | Analysis of routine clinical assessments of motor deficit using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper extremity (FMA-UE). Higher FMA-UE scores indicate reduction of deficit and improvement in patient's motor skills. Comparison of post-rehabilitation against baseline to ensure no deterioration, using statistical comparison of evaluation of standard clinical assessments performed during patients stay. | From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 or at 4 weeks. |
| Mood assessment | Description: Analysis of routine clinical assessments of assessning mood by using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). High scores indicate abnormal anxiety and/or depression. Comparison of post-rehabilitation against baseline to ensure no deterioration, using statistical comparison of evaluation of standard clinical assessments performed during patients stay. Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 or at 4 weeks. | From enrollment to the end of treatment at 2 or at 4 weeks. |
| Background |
| Baig SS, Kamarova M, Bell SM, Ali AN, Su L, Dimairo M, Dawson J, Redgrave JN, Majid A. tVNS in Stroke: A Narrative Review on the Current State and the Future. Stroke. 2023 Oct;54(10):2676-2687. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.123.043414. Epub 2023 Aug 30. |
| 33894832 | Background | Dawson J, Liu CY, Francisco GE, Cramer SC, Wolf SL, Dixit A, Alexander J, Ali R, Brown BL, Feng W, DeMark L, Hochberg LR, Kautz SA, Majid A, O'Dell MW, Pierce D, Prudente CN, Redgrave J, Turner DL, Engineer ND, Kimberley TJ. Vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation for upper limb motor function after ischaemic stroke (VNS-REHAB): a randomised, blinded, pivotal, device trial. Lancet. 2021 Apr 24;397(10284):1545-1553. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00475-X. |