Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Rationale:
Dysphagia is commonly encountered in patients with esophageal carcinoma who are no candidates for treatment with curative intent. It often has a considerable impact on quality of life and can cause malnourishment. Current palliative treatments mainly include esophageal stenting and radiotherapy, but these can be associated with substantial drawbacks such as a high rate of adverse events, fatigue or an untimely/ temporary symptom improvement. Recent studies showed promising results for the use of spray cryotherapy as palliation for dysphagia. Moreover, there are suggestions that cryotherapy has a positive effect on the host's anti-tumor response. However, no data exists on the feasibility, efficacy and safety for cryoballoon therapy in the esophagus. Secondly, cryo-immunologic data in patients with EC is lacking.
Objective:
Study Study population: Adult patients (≥18 years) with dysphagia due to incurable esophageal carcinoma Intervention (if applicable): Focal cryoballoon ablation of visible tumor during an upper endoscopy. Cryoballoon ablation will be performed for two cycles of 12 seconds. In total, patients will undergo 3 treatment sessions (range 1-3) with an interval of 1-3 weeks based onthe severity of symptoms reported by the patient.
Main study parameters/endpoints:
- Feasibility of cryoballoon ablation defined as technical success of the procedure
Host's anti-tumor response after cryoballoon ablation based on sequential esophageal tumor biopsies and peripheral blood samples
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cryotherapy | Procedure | Focal cryoballoon ablation, 1-3 treatments with an interval of 1-3 weeks |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Primary outcome safety | Safety based on incidence of all procedure related serious adverse events up to the end of follow-up. The technique is considered to be safe if ≥80% of the procedures is performed without the occurrence of procedure-related serious adverse events. | 2 weeks |
| primary outcome efficacy | Efficacy
| 2 weeks |
| primary outcome feasibility | Feasibility: defined as technical success rates of a full cryotherapy procedure. This includes the ability to pass the scope and the completion of a full circle of freezing and thawing, with the number of cycles needed per site as deemed necessary by the endoscopist. The technique is considered to be feasible if ≥70% of the procedures is technically successful. | 1 day |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| secondary outcome efficacy subjective | General questions, twice weekly, up to two weeks after last treatment:
|
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laura S Boer, Degree of medicine | Contact | 0887550224 | l.s.boer-17@umcutrecht.nl |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UMCU | Recruiting | Utrecht | Netherlands |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003680 | Deglutition Disorders |
| D004938 | Esophageal Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004935 | Esophageal Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D010608 | Pharyngeal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017679 | Cryotherapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 2 weeks |
| secondary outcome efficacy subjective | Reported outcomes on dysphagia scores twice weekly, up to two weeks after endoscopy, and thereafter at week 6, 8 and 12. | 12 weeks |
| secondary outcome pain | Post procedural pain based on twice weekly pain scores up to two weeks after last treatment
| 2 weeks |
| secondary outcome safety | Incidence of all (S)AE's | 12 weeks |
| secondary outcome other palliation | Necessity of receiving any other kind of palliation for dysphagia during follow-up | 12 weeks |
| Secondary outcome immunology | (Changes in) Host's anti-tumor response after cryoballoon ablation compared to baseline. Analyses on both blood and tissue samples will be performed. Moreover, the peripheral immune response will be compared with the tissue immune response. | 12 weeks |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
| D005770 | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D006258 | Head and Neck Neoplasms |