This study will test an intervention that was developed to improve parents' driving instruction of teens' hazard anticipation skills when teens are in the learner phase of licensure. Half of the parents in the study will receive the intervention and half will not. Investigators will then compare driving instructions given by parents in the two groups by recording driving sessions that parents and teens have together in that real world and by recording a drive that parents and teens will complete in a driving simulator. The driving simulator allows us to expose teens and parents to hazards they may encounter on the roadway without putting them in harm's way.

The project seeks to test an intervention designed to improve parents' communication about roadway hazards by comparing parent instruction and teen driving outcomes between dyads whose parents were assigned to the intervention vs. the control condition. Participants will be 100 parent-teen dyads. Half of the parent-teen dyads will receive the intervention and half will not. Parents who receive the intervention will complete web-based program developed to help parents instruct teens on how to identify hazards on the roadway and respond appropriately before they pose a crash risk. Parents in the intervention arm of the study will be given 2 weeks to complete the training. Parents in the control arm of the study will not receive training. After the delivery period, parents and teens will be given two additional weeks to apply the training in their everyday driving instruction. During this period, parents in both groups will complete a minimum of 5 drives with their teen that will be recorded. Investigators will then have teens and parents complete a drive in a driving simulator. Teens will drive and parents will instruct from the passenger seat, just like they would in the real world. The drive will have 12 hazards. Compared to parents in the control group, investigators believe that parents in the intervention group will exhibit improved communication about potential hazard detection with their teens. Similarly, the investigators believe that teens of parents who received the training will be better at anticipating and reacting to potential hazards on the roadway when driving independently compared to teens whose parents did not engage in the program.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Adolescents must be between the ages of 14 and 17 years. Additionally, they must be in the learner period of licensure.
• Parents must be the primary instructor of their teen's supervised driving.

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Data that will program performance metrics (reaction time, accuracy). Data gathered during testing includes reduced metrics of simulator driving performance (speed, lane position, brake force, and acceleration), video capture of parent-teen interactions in naturalistic and simulated roadway environments, parent-teen interaction data reduced via reliable conversation coding, and questionnaire data reported by both parents and teens (e.g., family communication pattern, parenting style, teen temperament, assessment of the driving environment during driving sessions).

Shared data will be de-identified and original data will be maintained at the primary investigator's institution. Video data will be deidentified to the extent possible.

The investigators will archive all data, metadata, study protocols, and demonstration videos on Databrary (https://nyu.databrary.org/). Databrary is an NSF- and NIH-supported data sharing and archiving site, specializing in studies with children.

This information will be made available at the time of publication and will be available on Databrary in perpetuity.

Anyone who receives IRB (or equivalent) approval can gain access tot the shared data.