Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| GIRCI Auvergne Rhone-Alpes | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men. Its incidence is rising as the population ages. In the localized stage, the 5-year overall survival rate (OS) is 98%. Metastatic progression and resistance to castration have a negative impact on prognosis. Despite recent advances in management, the 5-year OS is around 30%. Therapeutic advances in this indication have been made mainly by the use of taxanes and second-generation hormone therapy. These treatments have improved OS and progression-free survival (PFS). They are now used as standard therapy.
More recently, the Phase III VISION trial confirmed the improvement in OS and radiological PFS achieved by treatment with the radioligand 177Lutetium-PSMA-617 (Lu-PSMA) in patients with advanced metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
This treatment is currently available in early access in France. Despite encouraging results, 40% of patients will not respond to Lu-PSMA, and there are currently no validated predictive factors. Studies are currently on going, but the identification of biomarkers seems necessary to better stratify risk in these patients.
Numerous tissue prognostic tests based on molecular characteristics or cell proliferation are emerging with this in mind. At present, molecular profiling is not a routine technique for prostate cancer, as it is for other solid cancers. At an early stage, the Decipher® Genomic classification tool has shown prognostic utility independently of therapeutic and clinico-pathological data.
According to recent studies, methylome analysis would enable the subdivision of mCRPCs and could help identify new therapeutic targets.
In the metastatic phase, certain molecular abnormalities involving DNA repair genes are predictive of response to PARP inhibitors.
Molecular analysis (mutations, copy number alterations, gene expression, DNA methylation) could therefore be useful in optimizing the management of mCRPC patients treated with Lu-PSMA.
If reliable molecular abnormalities are identified on tissue, a diagnostic technique based on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis will be useful in decision-making for these patients. A biological collection will therefore be created during the course of this study, with a view to using ctDNA analysis in subsequent research.
Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in men. Its incidence is rising as the population ages. In the localized stage, the 5-year overall survival rate (OS) is 98%. Metastatic progression and resistance to castration have a negative impact on prognosis. Despite recent advances in management, the 5-year OS is around 30%. Therapeutic advances in this indication have been made mainly by the use of taxanes and second-generation hormone therapy. These treatments have improved OS and progression-free survival (PFS). They are now used as standard therapy.
More recently, the Phase III VISION trial confirmed the improvement in OS and radiological PFS achieved by treatment with the radioligand 177Lutetium-PSMA-617 (Lu-PSMA) in patients with advanced metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).
This treatment is currently available in early access in France. Despite encouraging results, 40% of patients will not respond to Lu-PSMA, and there are currently no validated predictive factors. Studies are currently on going, but the identification of biomarkers seems necessary to better stratify risk in these patients.
Numerous tissue prognostic tests based on molecular characteristics or cell proliferation are emerging with this in mind. At present, molecular profiling is not a routine technique for prostate cancer, as it is for other solid cancers. At an early stage, the Decipher® Genomic classification tool has shown prognostic utility independently of therapeutic and clinico-pathological data.
According to recent studies, methylome analysis would enable the subdivision of mCRPCs and could help identify new therapeutic targets.
In the metastatic phase, certain molecular abnormalities involving DNA repair genes are predictive of response to PARP inhibitors.
Molecular analysis (mutations, copy number alterations, gene expression, DNA methylation) could therefore be useful in optimizing the management of mCRPC patients treated with Lu-PSMA.
If reliable molecular abnormalities are identified on tissue, a diagnostic technique based on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis will be useful in decision-making for these patients. A biological collection will therefore be created during the course of this study, with a view to using ctDNA analysis in subsequent research.
This is an interventional, multi-center study. The study is prospective, single-arm, open-label and non-randomized.
Its primary objective is to identify biomarkers of interest, in primary tissue, predictive of response to Lu-PSMA treatment in patients with mCRPC, through the detection of molecular abnormalities in DNA/RNA and methyloma.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventional | Experimental | Genetic analysis will be conducted on intial tumor sample in order to identify biomarkers |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood samples | Biological | A total of 3 blood samples (2 tubes of 9mL each) are added. The first sample will be taken at the inclusion visit, the 2nd at the end of the 2nd treatment cycle and the last at the end of Lu-PSMA treatment. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Molecular abnormalities retained on primary tumor sample predicting response to Lu-PSMA in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer patients assessed according to RECIST 1.1 and/or PCWG3 criteria | Biological interpretation and response to Lu-PSMA treatment on bone scan and CT scan according to RECIST 1.1 and/or PCWG3 criteria | From enrollment to 24 months after Lu-PSMA treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Correlation between biomarker(s) (molecular abnormalities retained on primary tumor sample for the first outcome measure) and survival without radiological progression | Radiological progression free survival defined as the duration between the start date of treatment and the date of the first progression of the disease according to criteria RECIST V1.1 and criteria PCWG3; or the date of death whatever the cause. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Male >18 years of age
ECOG ≤ 2
Patient with histologically confirmed of metastatic castration resistant prostatic adenocarcinoma and with tumor biological material available (prostatic biopsies or prostatectomy)
Patient who received at least one taxane line and a second generation hormone therapy line
Patient receiving androgen deprivation therapy with serum testosterone < 50 ng/dL or < 1.7 nmol/L or having undergone surgical castration
Progressive mCRPC based based on at least 1 of the following criteria :
Patients with at least one metastasis, bone and/or soft tissue and/or visceral, documented by the following methods in the 43 days prior to inclusion :
Patient with Lu-PSMA treatment indication, confirmed by PET 68Ga-PSMA-11. Eligibility for 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET is defined as:
Adequate organ function :
Bone marrow reserve :
Hepatic function :
Renal function : Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) ≥ 50 mL/min/1.73m2 according to MDRD equation.
Obtaining the patient's free and informed consent
Social security scheme or beneficiary.
Exclusion Criteria :
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Judith PASSILDAS JAHANMOHAN, PhD | Contact | 0473278005 | judith.passildas@clermont.unicancer.fr |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centre Jean PERRIN | Recruiting | Clermont-Ferrand | 63011 | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| From enrollment to 24 months after Lu-PSMA treatment |
| Correlation between biomarker(s) (molecular abnormalities retained on primary tumor sample for the first outcome measure) and survival without biological progression | Biological progression free survival defined as the duration between the start date of treatment and the date of the first PSA progression | From enrollment to 24 months after Lu-PSMA treatment |
| Correlation between biomarker(s) (molecular abnormalities retained on primary tumor sample for the first outcome measure) and survival without clinical progression | Clinical progression free survival, definieds as the duration between the treatment start date and the date of the first clinical progression | From enrollment to 24 months after Lu-PSMA treatment |
| Correlation between biomarker(s) (molecular abnormalities retained on primary tumor sample for the first outcome measure) and overall survival | Overall survival definied as the time interval between the start date of treatment and the date of death whatever the cause | From enrollement to the end of the study, up to 58 months |
| Correlation between the biomarker(s) (molecular abnormalities retained on primary tumor sample for the first outcome measure) and adverse effects during treatment. | Toxicities related to treatment of grade 3 or higher according to CTCAE v. 5.0 and any EIG | From enrollment to the end of Lu-PSMA treatment, up to 58 months |
| Assess whether consideration of clinical characteristics improves biomarker performance | Performance status (0 to 4), pain and adverse events evaluations as assessed by CTCAE v4.0 | From enrollement to end of Lu-PSMA treatment, up to 58 months |
| Assess whether consideration of radiological characteristics improves biomarker performance | Radiological evaluation as assessed by RECIST criteria V1.1 and PCWG3 criteria | From enrollement to end of Lu-PSMA treatment, up to 58 months |
| Assess whether consideration of biological characteristics improves biomarker performance | Biological evaluation as assessed with PSA level | From enrollement to end of Lu-PSMA treatment, up to 58 months |
| Biological interpretation and response to Lu-PSMA treatment on PET scan | Radiological progression free survival defined as the duration between the start date of treatment according to RECIP 1.0 criteria for patients who underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET scans | From enrollment to 24 months after Lu-PSMA treatment |
| CHU de Grenoble | Not yet recruiting | La Tronche | 38700 | France |
|
| Hospices Civiles de Lyon | Not yet recruiting | Pierre-Bénite | 69310 | France |
|
| Hôpital privé de la Loire | Not yet recruiting | Saint-Etienne | 42100 | France |
|
| Centre Paul STRAUSS | Not yet recruiting | Strasbourg | 67091 | France |
|
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001800 | Blood Specimen Collection |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013048 | Specimen Handling |
| D019411 | Clinical Laboratory Techniques |
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |
| D011677 | Punctures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D008919 | Investigative Techniques |
Not provided
Not provided