Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A randomized, open-label, investigational safety evaluation of the Microporous Annealed Particle (MAP) Wound Matrix (TT101) device as a volumetric biomaterial scaffold applied to clean wounds after skin cancer surgery with Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) compared to control.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Microporous Annealed Particle (MAP) Wound Matrix | Experimental | The Microporous Annealed Particle (MAP) Wound Matrix device will be topically applied to the wound immediately following Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). |
|
| Hydrocolloid dressing (DuoDerm) | Active Comparator | A hydrocolloid (DuoDerm) will be topically applied to the wound immediately following Mohs micrographic surgery. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MAP Wound Matrix | Device | The MAP Wound Matrix is indicated for the management of full thickness wounds, including surgical sites, donor skin graft sites, wound dehiscence, lacerations, and draining wounds. The application of MAP Wound Matrix will occur immediately after Mohs surgery once hemostasis has been achieved |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of Serious Adverse Device Effects in the Treatment Group Compared to the Control Group. | Incidence of serious adverse device effects (SADE) (including delays in wound healing and surgical site infections) in subjects treated with MAP Wound Matrix, compared to the control group. | Week 0 (treatment) up to Week 24 (End of Study) |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
_ Has a confirmed diagnosis of clinically significant peripheral neuropathy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Andrea Quach, BS | Tempo Therapeutics | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cal Coast Dermatology | Encino | California | 91436 | United States | ||
| Laser and Skin Surgery Center of Indiana |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
All enrolled participants (N=40) were randomized and received the assigned intervention on the same day as enrollment. There were no exclusions between enrollment and assignment and no pre-assignment procedures (e.g., washout or run-in). No significant events occurred prior to assignment.
Participants were recruited at three U.S. dermatologic surgery centers. Eligible subjects were identified from patients scheduled to undergo Mohs micrographic surgery for non-melanoma skin cancer.
Screening, informed consent, eligibility confirmation, and enrollment were conducted on the same day as surgery. Subjects were enrolled consecutively based on protocol-defined criteria.
A total of 40 subjects were enrolled, within the planned enrollment range.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Microporous Annealed Particle (MAP) Wound Matrix | The Microporous Annealed Particle (MAP) Wound Matrix device was topically applied to the wound immediately following Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). |
| FG001 | Hydrocolloid Dressing (DuoDerm) | A hydrocolloid (DuoDerm) was topically applied to the wound immediately following Mohs micrographic surgery. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
No differences. All randomized participants (MAP: 26; Control: 14) were included in the baseline analysis.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Microporous Annealed Particle (MAP) Wound Matrix | The Microporous Annealed Particle (MAP) Wound Matrix device was topically applied to the wound immediately following Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). |
| BG001 | Hydrocolloid Dressing (DuoDerm) |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Incidence of Serious Adverse Device Effects in the Treatment Group Compared to the Control Group. | Incidence of serious adverse device effects (SADE) (including delays in wound healing and surgical site infections) in subjects treated with MAP Wound Matrix, compared to the control group. | All randomized participants were included in the analysis population. The number of participants analyzed is identical to the number assigned to each arm (MAP Wound Matrix: 26; Control: 14). No participants were excluded from the analysis. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Week 0 (treatment) up to Week 24 (End of Study) |
|
From enrollment until end of follow-up, up to 24 weeks
Adverse events and serious adverse events were defined and collected in accordance with ICH E6(R2) and FDA regulations. The safety population included all participants who received study treatment (N=40), which is identical to the number assigned to each arm. No differences in definitions or analysis populations were applied.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Microporous Annealed Particle (MAP) Wound Matrix | The Microporous Annealed Particle (MAP) Wound Matrix device was topically applied to the wound immediately following Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pneumonia (aspiration) | Infections and infestations | MedDRA version 28.0 | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephanie Deshayes | Tempo Therapeutics | 4242133013 | deshayes@tempothera.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Aug 1, 2024 | May 1, 2026 | Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D047070 | Bandages, Hydrocolloid |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001458 | Bandages |
| D004864 | Equipment and Supplies |
Not provided
Not provided
2:1 randomization model.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| DuoDerm | Device | DuoDerm is a hydrocolloid dressing will be topically applied to the wound immediately following Mohs surgery according to the manufacturer's instructions. |
|
| Indianapolis |
| Indiana |
| 46260 |
| United States |
| Studies in Dermatology | Cypress | Texas | 77429 | United States |
A hydrocolloid (DuoDerm) was topically applied to the wound immediately following Mohs micrographic surgery. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | Hydrocolloid Dressing (DuoDerm) | A hydrocolloid (DuoDerm) was topically applied to the wound immediately following Mohs micrographic surgery. |
|
|
| 0 |
| 26 |
| 0 |
| 26 |
| 0 |
| 26 |
| EG001 | Hydrocolloid Dressing (DuoDerm) | A hydrocolloid (DuoDerm) was topically applied to the wound immediately following Mohs micrographic surgery. | 0 | 14 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Urinary tract infection enterococcal | Infections and infestations | MedDRA version 28.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cardiac flutter with atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA version 28.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided