Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this prospective, multi-centre, exploratory research project is the establishment of a platform for in-depth tumour profiling in patients with advanced and metastatic High-Grade Adenocarcinoma (HGAC) of ovarian, tubal or peritoneal origin.
TUPRO-Gyn is part of the Tumour Profiler (TUPRO) research collaboration, which aims to help generate information about patients' individual tumour biology for patients with advanced malignancies, using innovative biotechnologies and computational analyses for in-depth molecular profiling. The TUPRO-Gyn study focuses on improving treatment for patients with advanced ovarian, tubal, or peritoneal cancer, who often face poor outcomes and limited options after initial therapy. The study aims to use advanced molecular profiling technologies to identify specific characteristics of tumors that can be targeted with personalized treatments. By building a comprehensive platform for in-depth tumor analysis, the project hopes to discover new biomarkers and support future clinical trials that match treatments to the molecular profile of individual tumors, potentially leading to better patient outcomes.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sample Processing and Report Generation (1) | - Number of samples with sufficient material and quality for intended analysis. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Sample Processing and Report Generation (2) | - Number of successfully processed samples per technology, with quality checks passed and interpretable results generated. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Sample Processing and Report Generation (3) | - Successful data transfers into the research data management system, ensuring results are timely for inclusion in the molecular research report. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Sample Processing and Report Generation (4) | - Number of molecular summary reports available for the Tumour Board. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Sample Processing and Report Generation (5) | - Proportion of cases where the Tumour Board found the molecular report useful for treatment recommendations. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Sample Processing and Report Generation (6) | - Proportion of cases where the treating physician found the Tumour Board's recommendation useful for treatment decisions. | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Sample Processing and Report Generation (7) |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients with advanced and metastatic High-Grade Adenocarcinoma (HGAC) of ovarian, tubal or peritoneal origin
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Andreas Wicki, Prof. Dr. med. | University Hospital, Zürich | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University Hospital Basel | Basel | 4031 | Switzerland | |||
| Kantonsspital Baselland |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Tumor tissue, blood and, if applicable, ascites fluid sample
- Types and combinations of molecular information considered useful for treatment recommendations beyond routine diagnostics. |
| Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Classification of Proposed Treatment Options | Possible treatment options are classified as follows:
| Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Classification of Tumour Board Recommendations | Grading of treatment recommendations using the European Society for Medical Oncology Scale for Clinical Actionability of Molecular Targets (ESCAT): I-A: Randomized trials show survival improvement with a tumor's alteration-drug match. I-B: Non-randomized trials show benefits in a specific tumor type. I-C: Clinical benefit seen across various tumor types or in basket trials. II-A: Retrospective studies show benefit in patients with a specific alteration vs. those without. II-B: Trials show better drug responsiveness, but no survival data. III-A: Benefit shown in a different tumor type; limited evidence for the patient's cancer type. III-B: Predicted impact similar to a studied alteration, lacking data. IV-A: Pre-clinical models show alteration affects drug sensitivity. IV-B: Actionability predicted in silico. V: Targeted therapy shows responses but no improved outcomes. X: No evidence the alteration is actionable | Through study completion, an average of 1 year |
| Time to first subsequent treatment (TTFST) | Time to first subsequent treatment (TTFST), incl. best supportive care | Through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up |
| Time to first subsequent treatment (TTFST) ratio | Time to first subsequent treatment (TTFST) ratio (TTFST 2 / TTFST 1: TTFST 2 = TTFST on current project; TTFST 1 = TTFST on previous treatment [before entering the project]) | Through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up |
| Terminations due to toxicity | Frequency (proportion) of patients terminating treatment due to toxicity | Through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up |
| Survival | Overall survival (OS), calculated from registration until death due to any cause | Through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up |
| Event free survival (EFS) | Event free survival (EFS), defined as time to treatment failure or death | Through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up |
| Radiological tumour response | Proportion of patients with a radiological tumour response (complete response (CR) / partial response (PR)) according to local standards and trial protocol (in case of referral or trial) | Through study completion, at least 6 month of follow up |
| Quality of Life (FAC-G7) questionnaire | Quality of Life assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General 7 (FACT-G7) questionnaire. The FACT-G7 uses a Likert scale, where responses range from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Higher scores indicate better quality of life, while lower scores suggest more severe symptoms or a poorer quality of life. | Every 12 weeks (+/- 2 weeks) for 6 months after last tumour sampling (day 0) |
| Liestal |
| 4410 |
| Switzerland |
| University Hospital Zurich | Zurich | 8091 | Switzerland |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000230 | Adenocarcinoma |
| D009362 | Neoplasm Metastasis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D009385 | Neoplastic Processes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided