Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the JenaValve Trilogyâ„¢ Heart Valve System for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in subjects with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (cfLVAD) and clinically significant aortic regurgitation (AR) who are indicated for TAVR
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| TAVR in LVAD Patients | Experimental | Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) TAVR in patients with continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (cfLVAD) and clinically significant aortic regurgitation (AR) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JenaValve Trilogy Heart Valve System | Device | TAVR with JenaValve Trilogy Heart Valve System |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Device Success | Freedom from unsuccessful delivery of the device, and retrieval of the delivery system | 30 days |
| Device Positioning | Freedom from incorrect positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location | 30 days |
| Device Performance | Intended performance of the valve (i.e., no moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation)* | 30 days |
| Surgery/intervention related to device | Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device# or to a major vascular or access-related or cardiac structural complication | 30 days |
| Bleeding | Freedom from VARC type 2-4 bleeding | 30 days |
| All Stroke | Number of patients that had stroke | 30 days |
| Acute Kidney Injury | Number of patients that had acute kidney injury (AKI) stage 3 or 4 | 30 days |
| Total aortic regurgitation | Number of patients that had moderate or severe total aortic regurgitation | 30 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Device Success | Freedom from unsuccessful delivery of the device, and retrieval of the delivery system | 30 days and 1 year |
| Device Positioning | Freedom from incorrect positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects >=18 years of age with continuous flow LVAD (cfLVAD) with clinically significant AR1 leading to cfLVAD dysfunction using cfLVAD ASE guidelines that utilize contemporary management strategies for measurement of AR in patients with cfLVAD2,3:
• AR is graded from 0 to 6 (0 = none; 1 = trace; 2 = mild; 3 = mild-to-moderate; 4 = moderate; 5 = moderate-to-severe; 6 = severe). Considering that AR during continuous flow LVAD (cfLVAD) support is generally both systolic and diastolic, AR is deemed significant if graded ≥ 3.1
Patient with NYHA functional class III/IV
Patient with high risk for SAVR as documented by Heart Team.
Patient has suitable anatomy to accommodate the insertion and delivery of the JenaValve Trilogyâ„¢ Heart Valve System
Patient or the patient's legal representative has provided written informed consent
Patient or the patient's legal representative agrees to comply with all required post-procedure follow-up visits
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| David Haan | Contact | 949-767-2110 | haan@jenavalve.com | |
| Duane Pinto | Contact | 949-767-2110 | pinto@jenavalve.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Nir Uriel, MD | Columbia University | Study Chair |
| Vinod Thourani, MD | Piedmont Heart Institute | Principal Investigator |
| Ravi Ramana, DO |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedars-Sinai Medical Center | Recruiting | Los Angeles | California | 90048 | United States | |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Uriel N, Sayer G, Addetia K, et al. Hemodynamic Ramp Tests in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices. JACC Heart Fail 2016; 4(3): 208-17. | View source |
| Stainback RF, Estep JD, Agler DA, et al. Echocardiography in the Management of Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices: Recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015; 28(8): 853-909. | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Major Vascular Complication | Number of patients that had major vascular, access-related, or cardiac structural complication | 30 days |
| Permanent pacemaker implantation | Number of patients that had these events | 30 days |
| All-cause mortality | All-cause mortality within the first 30 days post index procedure | 30 days |
| 30 days and 1 year |
| Device Performance | Intended performance of the valve (i.e., no moderate or severe prosthetic valve regurgitation)* | 30 days and 1 year |
| Surgery/intervention related to device | Freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device# or to a major vascular or access-related or cardiac structural complication | 30 days and 1 year |
| Bleeding | Freedom from VARC type 2-4 bleeding | 30 days and 1 year |
| All Stroke | Number of patients that had stroke | 30 days and 1 year |
| Acute Kidney Injury | Number of patients that had acute kidney injury (AKI) stage 3 or 4 | 30 days and 1 year |
| Total aortic regurgitation | Number of patients that had moderate or severe total aortic regurgitation | 30 days and 1 year |
| Major Vascular Complication | Number of patients that had major vascular, access-related, or cardiac structural complication | 30 days and 1 year |
| Permanent pacemaker implantation | Number of patients that had these events | 30 days and 1 year |
| All-cause mortality | All-cause mortality within the first 30 days post index procedure | 30 days and 1 year |
| advocate christ medical center |
| Principal Investigator |
| Gabriel Sayer, MD | Columbia University | Principal Investigator |
| Sutter Health |
| Recruiting |
| San Francisco |
| California |
| 94109 |
| United States |
| Medstar Washington Hospital Center | Recruiting | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20010 | United States |
| Emory University | Recruiting | Atlanta | Georgia | 30308 | United States |
| Piedmont | Recruiting | Atlanta | Georgia | 30309 | United States |
| Advocate Christ Medical Center | Recruiting | Oak Lawn | Illinois | 60453 | United States |
| University of Michigan | Recruiting | Ann Arbor | Michigan | 48109 | United States |
| Henry Ford Hospital | Recruiting | Detroit | Michigan | 48202 | United States |
| Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation | Recruiting | Minneapolis | Minnesota | 55407 | United States |
| Washington University, St. Louis | Recruiting | St Louis | Missouri | 63130 | United States |
| Columbia University Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital | Recruiting | New York | New York | 10032 | United States |
| Houston Methodist Research Center | Recruiting | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| Baylor | Recruiting | Plano | Texas | 75024 | United States |
| Intermountain | Recruiting | Murray | Utah | 84107 | United States |
| Sentara Norfolk General Hospital | Recruiting | Norfolk | Virginia | 23507 | United States |
| Accurate Quantification Methods for Aortic Insufficiency Severity in Patients With LVAD: Role of Diastolic Flow Acceleration and Systolic-to-Diastolic Peak Velocity Ratio of Outflow Cannula | View source |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001022 | Aortic Valve Insufficiency |
| D000082862 | Aortic Valve Disease |
| D018487 | Ventricular Dysfunction, Left |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006349 | Heart Valve Diseases |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D018754 | Ventricular Dysfunction |
Not provided
Not provided