Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Regional Centre - Violence, Trauma and Suicide Prevention - Region East (RVTS-East) | UNKNOWN |
| NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS | OTHER |
| Karolinska Institutet | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A significant proportion of people who are exposed to traumatic events suffer from post-traumatic sequelae, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Indicated preventive interventions soon after trauma could be appropriate. Yet, there is limited evidence for the efficacy of such interventions. Moreover, no evidence-based preventive interventions are readily available for victims in the aftermath of crises and disasters in Norway. Condensed Internet-delivered Prolonged Exposure (CIPE) is a preventive intervention designed for victims with symptoms of PTSD (PTSS) approximately one month after a traumatic event. The treatment is an internet-delivered, therapist assisted intervention, based on principles from Prolonged Exposure. CIPE has proven to be feasible, safe, and effective in previous studies. This study aims to test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of CIPE in the context of psychosocial crisis services in Norwegian municipalities.
Hypotheses Effectiveness H1 Participants receiving CIPE + treatment as usual (TAU) will have significantly less PTSS than participants receiving TAU at 6 weeks post T1, and at 6-, and 12- months after the traumatic incident.
H2 Significantly fewer participants receiving CIPE+TAU will fulfill the criteria for PTSD compared to participants receiving TAU, at 6- and 12-months post trauma.
H3 Participants receiving CIPE+TAU will have significantly less symptoms of depression and insomnia than participants receiving TAU at 6 weeks post T1, and at 6-, and 12- months after the traumatic incident.
H4 Participants in the CIPE+TAU-condition will report significantly higher treatment satisfaction at post-treatment, compared to those in the TAU-condition.
H5 Participants with traumatic loss receiving CIPE+TAU will have significantly less symptoms of prolonged grief than such participants receiving TAU 12 months after the loss.
Cost-effectiveness H6 Fewer participants in the CIPE+TAU-condition will be referred to second-tier specialty mental health services, and more will achieve improved quality of life within the first year after the traumatic incident, compared to participants in the TAU-condition.
H7 The CIPE+TAU implementation is more cost-effective compared to the TAU in the short run and may even dominate TAU in the long run (i.e., more effective and less costly).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Condensed internet-delivered prolonged exposure (CIPE) + Treatment-as-usual (TAU) | Experimental | Participants in this condition will receive Treatment-as-usual (TAU) from psychosocial crisis teams throughout the entire participation period (1 year post trauma), in addition to CIPE as an add-on lasting for six weeks after randomization (T1; randomization from 4 to 7 weeks, dependent on when the participant is recruited). In CIPE, participants are encouraged to have daily contact with their therapist through a secured email system within the platform. Therapists are also available for phone sessions. Total therapist contact for each participant is generally less than 60 minutes during the whole program. Participants are expected to work on intervention tasks for six hours each week and to complete the intervention in three weeks. The intervention is delivered by psychosocial crisis teams' staff in 14 municipalities in the central-eastern part of Norway. Content, frequency, and quantity of the CIPE+TAU-condition will be measured. |
|
| Treatment-as-usual (TAU) only | Active Comparator | Participants in this condition will receive Treatment-as-usual (TAU) throughout the entire participation period (1 year post trauma). The TAU-condition is delivered by the same municipality psychosocial crisis teams as the Condensed internet-delivered prolonged exposure (CIPE) +TAU arm. The crisis teams follow a national guideline (The Norwegian Directorate of Health, 2016), recommending proactive contact with victims, screening for psychosocial difficulties, and offering interventions to individuals with significant levels of trauma-related problems. Most municipalities organize interdisciplinary crisis services consisting of physicians, police, priests, nurses, and psychologists who receive referrals from emergency services after a traumatic event. There is currently considerable heterogeneity in the frequenzy and quantity of intervention across municipalities. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Condensed internet-delivered prolonged exposure (CIPE) | Behavioral | 'Condensed Internet-delivered Prolonged Exposure' (CIPE) is an intervention designed for victims with symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) soon after a traumatic incident. CIPE is a therapist-supported intervention that consists of four modules delivered over the internet. Central CIPE-interventions include psychoeducation of normal post-traumatic reactions, in-vivo exposure, imaginary exposure, and a breathing exercise. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5; Norwegian version) | 20-item questionnaire that measures DSM-5-specified symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The total score ranges from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Items are rated on a 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely") Likert type scale. The PCL-5 has demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties in various trauma populations. This study will administer a Norwegian version of the PCL-5. Recall period: one month. | Post-treatment (10 - 13 weeks after trauma) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5; Norwegian version) | 20-item questionnaire that measures DSM-5-specified symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The total score ranges from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Items are rated on a 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely") Likert type scale. The PCL-5 has demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties in various trauma populations. This study will administer a Norwegian version of the PCL-5. Recall period: one month. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mild-moderate adverse events questionnaire | Severe adverse events are monitored and addressed continuously, and will be reported. Mild-moderate adverse events (AE) are reported on an unvalidated generic questionnaire, utilized in previous studies. Participants are asked to report experiences of AEs, and to describe the event briefly, report number of weeks after the traumatic event when the AE took place, frequency, and duration of the AE, and how the AE impacted quality of life when it occurred and today. The participants are also asked to report an appraisal of whether the AE was associated with receiving Condensed internet-delivered prolonged exposure (CIPE). Recall period: last 6 weeks. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harald Bækkelund, PhD | Contact | +47 90964268 | harald.bakkelund@nkvts.no | |
| Marianne S Birkeland, PhD | Contact | +47 41433496 | m.s.birkeland@nkvts.no |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Harald Bækkelund, PhD | Norwegian Center for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asker municipality - Psychosocial crisis team | Recruiting | Asker | Asker | 1384 | Norway |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26606250 | Background | Blevins CA, Weathers FW, Davis MT, Witte TK, Domino JL. The Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5): Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation. J Trauma Stress. 2015 Dec;28(6):489-98. doi: 10.1002/jts.22059. Epub 2015 Nov 25. | |
| 35338915 | Background | Mekawi Y, Silverstein MW, Walker A, Ishiekwene M, Carter S, Michopoulos V, Stevens JS, Powers A. Examining the psychometric properties of the PCL-5 in a black community sample using item response theory. J Anxiety Disord. 2022 Apr;87:102555. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2022.102555. Epub 2022 Mar 10. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| The Norwegian Directorate of Health. (2016). National guidelines for psychosocial support in the aftermath of crises and catastrophes | View source |
Not provided
Anonymized individual participant outcome- and background data, and code generated from the project, will be made available upon reasonable request, to the degree permitted by ethical board approval.
Beginning six months and ending 5 years following article production.
Researchers with a methodologically sound proposal. Proposals should be directed to PI.
Not provided
Not provided
| The Research Council of Norway |
| OTHER |
Parallel two-armed multicenter add on randomized controlled trial.
Not provided
Not provided
Investigator: senior statistician will be blinded for condition. Junior statistician will not, due to practical barriers (double role as the study coordinator). The person responsible for randomization will be blinded for the outcome of the screening (T0) and baseline (T1) assessments.
Outcome assessors: graduate psychology students who will perform the clinical interviews will be blinded for condition.
|
| Treatment-as-usual (TAU) | Behavioral | There is currently considerable heterogeneity regarding the interventional principles applied in the Treatment-as-usual (TAU) condition across municipal crisis teams. The national guidelines (The Norwegian Directorate of Health, 2016), recommends several interventional principles such as psychological first aid (PFA), psychoeducation regarding crisis reactions/symptoms of acute stress, normalization of such reactions, activation of social support, and practical assistance. |
|
| 6 months follow-up |
| PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5; Norwegian version) | 20-item questionnaire that measures DSM-5-specified symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). The total score ranges from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Items are rated on a 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("extremely") Likert type scale. The PCL-5 has demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties in various trauma populations. This study will administer a Norwegian version of the PCL-5. Recall period: one month. | 12 months follow-up |
| Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5; Norwegian version) | 30-item structured interview, developed to assess current and life-time post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-diagnosis, as well as past-week PTSD symptoms. The instrument measures the 20 DSM-5 PTSD-symptoms, in addition to the onset and duration of symptoms, related subjective distress and functional impairment (social, occupational), amongst other aspects of the disorder. Standardized questions and probes are provided. A Norwegian version of the CAPS-5 are administered. CAPS-5 has demonstrated excellent psychometric properties. | 6-months follow-up |
| Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5; Norwegian version) | 30-item structured interview, developed to assess current and life-time post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)-diagnosis, as well as past-week PTSD symptoms. The instrument measures the 20 DSM-5 PTSD-symptoms, in addition to the onset and duration of symptoms, related subjective distress and functional impairment (social, occupational), amongst other aspects of the disorder. Standardized questions and probes are provided. A Norwegian version of the CAPS-5 are administered. CAPS-5 has demonstrated excellent psychometric properties. | 12-months follow-up |
| Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; Norwegian version) | 9-item self-report measure of depressive symptom severity. The recall period is 2 weeks. Response is given on a 4-point Likert scale (0: not at all, 1: several days, 2: more than half the days, and 3: nearly every day), resulting in the total score ranging from 0 to 27. Higher scores indicate higher symptom severity. The instrument is sensitive for both clinical- and sub-clinical levels of depressive symptoms, and have demonstrated favorable psychometric properties. A validated Norwegian version of the PHQ-9 is applied. | Post-treatment (10 - 13 weeks after trauma) |
| Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; Norwegian version) | 9-item self-report measure of depressive symptom severity. The recall period is 2 weeks. Response is given on a 4-point Likert scale (0: not at all, 1: several days, 2: more than half the days, and 3: nearly every day), resulting in the total score ranging from 0 to 27. Higher scores indicate higher symptom severity. The instrument is sensitive for both clinical- and sub-clinical levels of depressive symptoms, and have demonstrated favorable psychometric properties. A validated Norwegian version of the PHQ-9 is applied. | 6-months follow-up |
| Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9; Norwegian version) | 9-item self-report measure of depressive symptom severity. The recall period is 2 weeks. Response is given on a 4-point Likert scale (0: not at all, 1: several days, 2: more than half the days, and 3: nearly every day), resulting in the total score ranging from 0 to 27. Higher scores indicate higher symptom severity. The instrument is sensitive for both clinical- and sub-clinical levels of depressive symptoms, and have demonstrated favorable psychometric properties. A validated Norwegian version of the PHQ-9 is applied. | 12-months follow-up |
| Insomnia Severity Index (ISI; Norwegian version) | 7-item questionnaire, which measures insomnia symptoms during the past two weeks. The instrument utilizes a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4, yielding a total score of 0-28. Higher scores indicate more insomnia symptoms. The ISI has demonstrated favorable psychometric properties. A Norwegian version of the ISI is applied. | Post-treatment (10 - 13 weeks after trauma) |
| Insomnia Severity Index (ISI; Norwegian version) | 7-item questionnaire, which measures insomnia symptoms during the past two weeks. The instrument utilizes a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4, yielding a total score of 0-28. Higher scores indicate more insomnia symptoms. The ISI has demonstrated favorable psychometric properties. A Norwegian version of the ISI is applied. | 6-months follow-up |
| Insomnia Severity Index (ISI; Norwegian version) | 7-item questionnaire, which measures insomnia symptoms during the past two weeks. The instrument utilizes a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 4, yielding a total score of 0-28. Higher scores indicate more insomnia symptoms. The ISI has demonstrated favorable psychometric properties. A Norwegian version of the ISI is applied. | 12-months follow-up |
| Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8; Norwegian version) | Eight-item measure of participants' service satisfaction. Response is given on a scale ranging from one to four, with a resulting total score range from eight to 32. Higher scores suggest higher service satisfaction. A validated Norwegian version of the CSQ-8 will be applied. | Post-treatment (10 - 13 weeks after trauma) |
| EQ-5D-5L (Norwegian version) | Self-reported health-related quality of life. Self-care, mobility, pain/discomfort, usual activities, and anxiety/depression are measured on a 5-point scale. Response to each item is given by checking off one of five descriptions of functionality in that domain (e.g., have no problems doing my usual activities, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, or unable to do my usual activities). The total score ranges from 5 to 25, with higher scores indicating poorer health-related quality of life. Participant also rate their overall health on a scale from 1 (worst health) to 100 (best health). This scale is called the EQ VAS and is a part of the EQ-5D-5L. The instrument has demonstrated excellent psychometric properties. Recall period: today. | Post-treatment (10 - 13 weeks after trauma) |
| EQ-5D-5L (Norwegian version) | Self-reported health-related quality of life. Self-care, mobility, pain/discomfort, usual activities, and anxiety/depression are measured on a 5-point scale. Response to each item is given by checking off one of five descriptions of functionality in that domain (e.g., have no problems doing my usual activities, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, or unable to do my usual activities). The total score ranges from 5 to 25, with higher scores indicating poorer health-related quality of life. Participant also rate their overall health on a scale from 1 (worst health) to 100 (best health). This scale is called the EQ VAS and is a part of the EQ-5D-5L. The instrument has demonstrated excellent psychometric properties. Recall period: today. | 6-months follow-up |
| EQ-5D-5L (Norwegian version) | Self-reported health-related quality of life. Self-care, mobility, pain/discomfort, usual activities, and anxiety/depression are measured on a 5-point scale. Response to each item is given by checking off one of five descriptions of functionality in that domain (e.g., have no problems doing my usual activities, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, or unable to do my usual activities). The total score ranges from 5 to 25, with higher scores indicating poorer health-related quality of life. Participant also rate their overall health on a scale from 1 (worst health) to 100 (best health). This scale is called the EQ VAS and is a part of the EQ-5D-5L. The instrument has demonstrated excellent psychometric properties. Recall period: today. | 12-months follow-up |
| The Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL; Norwegian version) | Validated 10-item self-report measure of quality of life specific to people with different mental health conditions. The total score ranges from 0 to 40, with lower scores indicating low quality of life. The scale has demonstrated excellent psychometric properties. | Post-treatment (10 - 13 weeks after trauma) |
| The Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL; Norwegian version) | Validated 10-item self-report measure of quality of life specific to people with different mental health conditions. The total score ranges from 0 to 40, with lower scores indicating low quality of life. The scale has demonstrated excellent psychometric properties. | 6-months follow-up |
| The Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL; Norwegian version) | Validated 10-item self-report measure of quality of life specific to people with different mental health conditions. The total score ranges from 0 to 40, with lower scores indicating low quality of life. The scale has demonstrated excellent psychometric properties. | 12-months follow-up |
| Traumatic grief inventory self report, TGI-SR+ | The TGI-SR+ is a 22-item self-report questionnaire to assess symptoms of DSM-5 persistent complex bereavement disorder (PCBD), and ICD-11 Prolonged grief disorder (PGD). Total score ranges from 22 to 110, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. The instrument has demonstrated good psychometric properties. Recall period: last month. | 12-months follow-up |
| Post-treatment (10 - 13 weeks after trauma) |
| Self-reported work absence and use of health services | Unvalidated questionnaire measuring job status, number of days on sick leave, annually household income, number of consultations with different types of health professionals, number of days admitted to inpatient psychiatric care, and psychotropic medication. Work absence and the type and quantity of services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years. Recall period: 6 weeks (except annual income). | Post-treatment (10 weeks after trauma) |
| Self-reported work absence and use of health services | Unvalidated questionnaire measuring job status, number of days on sick leave, annually household income, number of consultations with different types of health professionals, number of days admitted to inpatient psychiatric care, and psychotropic medication. Work absence and the type and quantity of services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years. Recall period: 3,5 months (except annual income). | 6-months follow-up |
| Self-reported work absence and use of health services | Unvalidated questionnaire measuring job status, number of days on sick leave, annually household income, number of consultations with different types of health professionals, number of days admitted to inpatient psychiatric care, and psychotropic medication. Work absence and the type and quantity of services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years. Recall period: 6 months (except annual income). | 12-months follow-up |
| Clinician-reported use of municipality health services | Unvalidated questionnaire where clinicians in the municipality health services register date and place of consultation, type of health service, the clinician's profession, content, total minutes used, and any referral to other health services. Use of municipality health services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years. Recall period: 1 month. | 2-months follow-up (2 months after trauma) |
| Clinician-reported use of municipality health services | Unvalidated questionnaire where clinicians in the municipality health services register date and place of consultation, type of health service, the clinician's profession, content, total minutes used, and any referral to other health services. Use of municipality health services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years. Recall period: 1 month. | 3-months follow-up (3 months after trauma) |
| Clinician-reported use of municipality health services | Unvalidated questionnaire where clinicians in the municipality health services register date and place of consultation, type of health service, the clinician's profession, content, total minutes used, and any referral to other health services. Use of municipality health services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years. Recall period: 1 month. | 4-months follow-up (4 months after trauma) |
| Clinician-reported use of municipality health services | Unvalidated questionnaire where clinicians in the municipality health services register date and place of consultation, type of health service, the clinician's profession, content, total minutes used, and any referral to other health services. Use of municipality health services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years. Recall period: 1 month. | 5-months follow-up (5 months after trauma) |
| Clinician-reported use of municipality health services | Unvalidated questionnaire where clinicians in the municipality health services register date and place of consultation, type of health service, the clinician's profession, content, total minutes used, and any referral to other health services. Use of municipality health services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years. Recall period: 1 month. | 6-months follow-up (6 months after trauma) |
| Clinician-reported use of municipality health services | Unvalidated questionnaire where clinicians in the municipality health services register date and place of consultation, type of health service, the clinician's profession, content, total minutes used, and any referral to other health services. Use of municipality health services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years. Recall period: 1 month. | 7-months follow-up (7 months after trauma) |
| Clinician-reported use of municipality health services | Unvalidated questionnaire where clinicians in the municipality health services register date and place of consultation, type of health service, the clinician's profession, content, total minutes used, and any referral to other health services. Use of municipality health services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years. Recall period: 1 month. | 8-months follow-up (8 months after trauma) |
| Clinician-reported use of municipality health services | Unvalidated questionnaire where clinicians in the municipality health services register date and place of consultation, type of health service, the clinician's profession, content, total minutes used, and any referral to other health services. Use of municipality health services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years. Recall period: 1 month. | 9-months follow-up (9 months after trauma) |
| Clinician-reported use of municipality health services | Unvalidated questionnaire where clinicians in the municipality health services register date and place of consultation, type of health service, the clinician's profession, content, total minutes used, and any referral to other health services. Use of municipality health services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years. Recall period: 1 month. | 10-months follow-up (10 months after trauma) |
| Clinician-reported use of municipality health services | Unvalidated questionnaire where clinicians in the municipality health services register date and place of consultation, type of health service, the clinician's profession, content, total minutes used, and any referral to other health services. Use of municipality health services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years. Recall period: 1 month. | 11-months follow-up (11 months after trauma) |
| Clinician-reported use of municipality health services | Unvalidated questionnaire where clinicians in the municipality health services register date and place of consultation, type of health service, the clinician's profession, content, total minutes used, and any referral to other health services. Use of municipality health services will be transformed to reflect costs related to services used, using cost units from the corresponding financial years. Recall period: 1 month. | 12-months follow-up (12 months after trauma) |
| Registry data on use of specialist health services | Registry data from the Norwegian Patient Registry (NPR) on referrals to specialist health services, date of consultation, type of consultation, diagnostic information. | 12-months follow-up |
| Registry data on use of health services | Registry data from municipality patient' and user registry (KPR) on consultations with general practitioners and acute health services, date of consultation, type of consultation, diagnostic information. | 12-months follow-up |
| Registry data on use of health service and work absence | Registry data on work absence/received social security (FD-Trygd). | 12-months follow-up |
| Psychosocial crisis team - Indre Østfold kommune | Recruiting | Askim | Askim | 1830 | Norway |
|
| Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, St Hanshaugen | Recruiting | Oslo | Oslo | 0170 | Norway |
|
| Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Ullern | Recruiting | Oslo | Oslo | 0377 | Norway |
|
| Norwegian Center for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies | Recruiting | Oslo | Oslo | 0484 | Norway |
|
| Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Nordre Aker | Recruiting | Oslo | Oslo | 0484 | Norway |
|
| Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Østensjø | Recruiting | Oslo | Oslo | 0694 | Norway |
|
| Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Vestre Aker | Recruiting | Oslo | Oslo | 0754 | Norway |
|
| Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Grorud | Recruiting | Oslo | Oslo | 0954 | Norway |
|
| Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Alna | Recruiting | Oslo | Oslo | 1051 | Norway |
|
| Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Søndre Nordstrand | Recruiting | Oslo | Oslo | 1203 | Norway |
|
| Aurskog-Høland - Psychosocial crisis team | Recruiting | Bjørkelangen | Norway |
|
| Fredrikstad municipality - Psychosocial Crisis team | Recruiting | Fredrikstad | Norway |
|
| Gjøvik municipality - psychosocial crisis team | Recruiting | Gjøvik | Norway |
|
| Halden Municipality - psychosocial crisis team | Recruiting | Halden | Norway |
|
| Hamar Municipality - psychosocial crisis team | Recruiting | Hamar | Norway |
|
| Søndre Land municipality - psychosocial crisis team | Recruiting | Hov | Norway |
|
| Ullensaker municipality - psychosocial crisis team | Recruiting | Jessheim | Norway |
|
| Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Bjerke | Recruiting | Oslo | Norway |
|
| Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Frogner | Recruiting | Oslo | Norway |
|
| Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, gamle Oslo | Recruiting | Oslo | Norway |
|
| Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Grünerløkka | Recruiting | Oslo | Norway |
|
| Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Nordstrand | Recruiting | Oslo | Norway |
|
| Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Sagene | Recruiting | Oslo | Norway |
|
| Psychosocial crisis team - Oslo, Stovner | Recruiting | Oslo | Norway |
|
| Psychosocial emergency service - Oslo emergency room | Recruiting | Oslo | Norway |
|
| Ringsaker municipality - Psychosocial crisis team | Recruiting | Ringsaker | Norway |
|
| Gjerdrum - psychosocial crisis team | Recruiting | Sørum | Norway |
|
| Nannestad municipality - psychosocial crisis team | Recruiting | Teigebyen | Norway |
|
| 27098450 | Background | Sveen J, Bondjers K, Willebrand M. Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5: a pilot study. Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2016 Apr 19;7:30165. doi: 10.3402/ejpt.v7.30165. eCollection 2016. |
| 34941354 | Background | Marx BP, Lee DJ, Norman SB, Bovin MJ, Sloan DM, Weathers FW, Keane TM, Schnurr PP. Reliable and clinically significant change in the clinician-administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 and PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 among male veterans. Psychol Assess. 2022 Feb;34(2):197-203. doi: 10.1037/pas0001098. Epub 2021 Dec 23. |
| 28493729 | Background | Weathers FW, Bovin MJ, Lee DJ, Sloan DM, Schnurr PP, Kaloupek DG, Keane TM, Marx BP. The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5): Development and initial psychometric evaluation in military veterans. Psychol Assess. 2018 Mar;30(3):383-395. doi: 10.1037/pas0000486. Epub 2017 May 11. |
| 35818021 | Background | Brattmyr M, Lindberg MS, Solem S, Hjemdal O, Havnen A. Factor structure, measurement invariance, and concurrent validity of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale-7 in a Norwegian psychiatric outpatient sample. BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jul 11;22(1):461. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04101-z. |
| 11556941 | Background | Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x. |
| 33402149 | Background | Wisting L, Johnson SU, Bulik CM, Andreassen OA, Ro O, Bang L. Psychometric properties of the Norwegian version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) in a large female sample of adults with and without eating disorders. BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 5;21(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-03013-0. |
| 11438246 | Background | Bastien CH, Vallieres A, Morin CM. Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research. Sleep Med. 2001 Jul;2(4):297-307. doi: 10.1016/s1389-9457(00)00065-4. |
| 17040003 | Background | Buysse DJ, Ancoli-Israel S, Edinger JD, Lichstein KL, Morin CM. Recommendations for a standard research assessment of insomnia. Sleep. 2006 Sep;29(9):1155-73. doi: 10.1093/sleep/29.9.1155. |
| 21532953 | Background | Morin CM, Belleville G, Belanger L, Ivers H. The Insomnia Severity Index: psychometric indicators to detect insomnia cases and evaluate treatment response. Sleep. 2011 May 1;34(5):601-8. doi: 10.1093/sleep/34.5.601. |
| 36316661 | Background | Pedersen H, Havnen A, Brattmyr M, Attkisson CC, Lara-Cabrera ML. A digital Norwegian version of the client satisfaction questionnaire 8: factor validity and internal reliability in outpatient mental health care. BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 31;22(1):671. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04281-8. |
| 33284428 | Background | Feng YS, Kohlmann T, Janssen MF, Buchholz I. Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: a systematic review of the literature. Qual Life Res. 2021 Mar;30(3):647-673. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02688-y. Epub 2020 Dec 7. |
| 29433611 | Background | Keetharuth AD, Brazier J, Connell J, Bjorner JB, Carlton J, Taylor Buck E, Ricketts T, McKendrick K, Browne J, Croudace T, Barkham M. Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL): a new generic self-reported outcome measure for use with people experiencing mental health difficulties. Br J Psychiatry. 2018 Jan;212(1):42-49. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2017.10. |
| 34700189 | Background | Lenferink LIM, Eisma MC, Smid GE, de Keijser J, Boelen PA. Valid measurement of DSM-5 persistent complex bereavement disorder and DSM-5-TR and ICD-11 prolonged grief disorder: The Traumatic Grief Inventory-Self Report Plus (TGI-SR+). Compr Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;112:152281. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152281. Epub 2021 Oct 21. |
| 37310324 | Background | Bragesjo M, Arnberg FK, Olofsdotter Lauri K, Aspvall K, Sarnholm J, Andersson E. Condensed Internet-delivered prolonged exposure provided soon after trauma: a randomised trial. Psychol Med. 2023 Apr;53(5):1989-1998. doi: 10.1017/S0033291721003706. Epub 2021 Sep 14. |
| Background | American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 |
| 41645255 | Derived | Lassen ER, Birkeland MS, Egeland K, Stene LE, Brodersen D, Ekornas B, Reinholdt NP, Kjerstad E, Lamu AN, Aarons GA, Crable EL, Bragesjo M, Baekkelund H. Early Support after Exposure to Trauma (EASE): protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of an internet-based intervention for PTSD prevention. Trials. 2026 Feb 5;27(1):196. doi: 10.1186/s13063-026-09502-z. |
| Heir, T. (2014). PCL-5. Norwegian centre for violence and traumatic stress studies. | View source |
| Bækkelund, H., Aareskjold, J., \& Endsjø, M. (2015). KLINIKERADMINISTRERT PTSD-SKALA FOR DSM-5: Versjon for vurdering av siste måned. Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies. | View source |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013313 | Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D040921 | Stress Disorders, Traumatic |
| D000068099 | Trauma and Stressor Related Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided