Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a multicenter, randomized controlled, prospective, non-inferiority, open-label study aiming to evaluate whether the efficacy and safety of using a 7F thin-walled sheath via distal radial artery (dTRA) access for coronary intervention (PCI) are non-inferior to the use of a 6F thin-walled sheath. The study population includes adult patients who are candidates for coronary intervention. The primary endpoint is the rate of radial artery and distal radial artery occlusion 24 hours post-procedure.
This study is a multicenter, randomized controlled, prospective, non-inferiority, open-label clinical trial designed to compare the efficacy and safety of using 7F thin-walled sheaths versus 6F thin-walled sheaths for coronary intervention (PCI) via distal radial artery access (dTRA). The study will enroll adult patients with coronary artery disease who are scheduled to undergo PCI.
Participants will be randomized into two groups: the experimental group, which will receive PCI using a 7F sheath, and the control group, which will receive PCI using a 6F sheath. The primary endpoint is the rate of radial artery and distal radial artery occlusion 24 hours post-procedure, assessed by ultrasound. Secondary endpoints include the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events during follow-up, cannulation success rate, PCI success rate, and the rate of radial artery occlusion at 30 days post-procedure, among others.
The study aims to determine whether the 7F sheath is non-inferior to the 6F sheath in terms of safety and efficacy for PCI through dTRA. The study will be conducted at multiple centers in China, with a planned enrollment of 574 participants, and it will span from Sep 2024 to January 2026. All procedures will adhere to the highest standards of clinical practice, and patient data will be managed with strict confidentiality.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7F Sheath Intervention Group | Experimental | Participants in this arm will undergo coronary intervention using a 7F thin-walled sheath via distal radial artery access. This group will be used to assess the efficacy and safety of the 7F sheath compared to the 6F sheath. |
|
| 6F Sheath Control Group | Active Comparator | Participants in this arm will undergo coronary intervention using a 6F thin-walled sheath via distal radial artery access. This group will serve as the control to compare the outcomes against those of the 7F sheath group. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7F Thin-Walled Sheath | Device | The 7F Thin-Walled Sheath is used during coronary intervention procedures via distal radial artery access. This device has a smaller outer diameter compared to traditional 7F sheaths, designed to reduce the risk of vascular complications while allowing for the performance of complex coronary interventions. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Radial Artery Occlusion Rate 24 Hours Post-Procedure | The primary outcome is the rate of radial artery and distal radial artery occlusion 24 hours after the procedure. Occlusion will be determined by the absence of blood flow spectrum in the radial artery as assessed by ultrasound. | 24 hours post-procedure |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE) | The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events during the follow-up period, including all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, new-onset myocardial infarction, and new-onset stroke. | Up to 30 days post-procedure |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lijian Gao, PhD. MD. | Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fuwai Hospital, CAMS & PUMC | Beijing | Beijing Municipality | 100037 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40953816 | Derived | Liu M, Du Y, Cui C, Li C, Yu W, Wang H, Song Y, Gao Z, Song L, Zhai J, Yang Y, Yang W, Wu Y, Liu D, Guo J, Heisha N, Liu H, Zhao Y, Zhang F, Tang Y, Zhao Y, Yu M, Zhang B, Yang J, Li R, Li H, Xiong X, Guo X, Li H, Song Y, Duan F, Gao L. Distal Radial Artery Access With 6F and 7F Thin-Walled Sheaths for Coronary Intervention: A Multicentre, Randomized, DRAWS Trial Protocol. Can J Cardiol. 2025 Dec;41(12):2420-2428. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2025.09.002. Epub 2025 Sep 13. |
Not provided
Not provided
The decision not to share individual participant data (IPD) is based on concerns related to patient confidentiality and data privacy. While all data collected in this study will be securely stored and managed, the nature of the data involves sensitive health information that could potentially identify participants. Furthermore, the current study does not have the necessary infrastructure or resources in place to manage the secure and controlled distribution of IPD to external researchers. Therefore, to protect participant privacy and adhere to ethical standards, we have decided not to share IPD for this trial.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
This study uses a Parallel Assignment model, where participants are randomly assigned to one of two groups: the 7F sheath intervention group or the 6F sheath control group. Each group will receive a different size sheath for coronary intervention via distal radial artery access. The study is designed to compare the outcomes between these two groups, with no crossover between groups during the trial. This model allows for a direct comparison of the efficacy and safety between the two sheath sizes under similar clinical conditions.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| 6F Thin-Walled Sheath | Device | The 6F Thin-Walled Sheath is the standard device used in coronary intervention procedures via distal radial artery access. It is employed as a control in this study to compare its efficacy and safety against the 7F Thin-Walled Sheath. |
|
| Cannulation Success Rate |
The success rate of sheath insertion and placement in the radial artery during the coronary intervention procedure. |
| During the procedure |
| PCI Success Rate | The success rate of the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure, defined by the successful completion of the intended intervention with appropriate device placement and without the need for conversion to an alternative access site. | During the procedure |
| Radial Artery Occlusion Rate 30 Days Post-Procedure | The rate of radial artery and distal radial artery occlusion 30 days after the procedure, assessed by ultrasound. | 30 days post-procedure |
| Major Bleeding Events | The incidence of major bleeding events, defined according to the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria (Type 3 or Type 5 bleeding). | Up to 30 days post-procedure |
| Local Neurological Complications | The incidence of local neurological complications, including numbness, tingling, or motor deficits in the arm used for radial artery access. | Up to 30 days post-procedure |
| Incidence and Severity of Forearm Hematoma | Forearm hematoma will be graded using the EASY (Early Discharge After Transradial Stenting of Coronary Arteries Study) hematoma scale. The scale ranges from Grade I to Grade V: Grade I: Hematoma <5 cm in diameter (non-significant) Grade II: Hematoma 5-10 cm in diameter (mild) Grade III: Hematoma >10 cm but distal to the elbow (moderate) Grade IV: Hematoma extending above the elbow (severe) Grade V: Hematoma associated with ischemic threat to the hand (compartment syndrome) Higher grades indicate worse outcomes. | Up to 30 days post-procedure |
| Pain Scores | Patient-reported pain scores assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The scale ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), with higher scores indicating worse outcomes. | Up to 30 days post-procedure |
| Daily Living Ability Scores | Daily living abilities assessed using the Barthel Index, which ranges from 0 (complete dependence) to 100 (complete independence), with higher scores indicating better outcomes. | Up to 30 days post-procedure |
| Length of Hospital Stay | The total length of hospital stay, measured in days, starting from the date of admission for the coronary intervention procedure until the date of discharge, with a maximum assessment period of up to 30 days post-procedure. | From the time of admission for the procedure until the date of discharge, assessed up to 30 days post-procedure |
| Unplanned Additional Interventions During Hospitalization | The incidence of unplanned additional interventions required during the initial hospitalization, including but not limited to additional PCI, vascular repair, or treatment of complications. The events will be assessed from the time of the procedure until the patient is discharged, with a maximum assessment period of up to 30 days post-procedure. | From the time of procedure until discharge, assessed up to 30 days post-procedure |