Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Axillary lymph node dissection has long been regarded as standard if treatment of the axilla is indicated for patients with a positive sentinel node. Although axillary lymph node dissection provides excellent regional control, it is associated with harmful side-effects. Since the publication of IBCSG23-01, ACOSOG Z0011 and AMAROS study, these studies indicated that there was no significant difference in recurrence and overall survival rates between the ALNB and SLNB+ALND followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. Therefore, an adaptation of the strategy to omit axillary lymph node dissection in patients with low-risk axillary involvement who are treated with curative surgery and systematic therapy. However, they also pose new challenges for adjuvant radiotherapy decisions. In the Z0011 study, patients were required to receive breast tangent field radiotherapy. In the AMAROS study, axillary radiotherapy included level I-III axillary lymph node drainage areas and the supraclavicular area, but the study results showed a local recurrence rate of only 1.19% at 5 years in the axillary radiotherapy group. Consequently, there is considerable controversy among clinical experts about whether a combined regional lymphatic drainage area radiotherapy strategy is necessary for low-burden sentinel lymph node metastasis breast cancer patients. In contrast, results from the EORTC-22922 and MA-20 studies, which included patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection, showed that adjuvant radiotherapy to the entire lymphatic drainage area, including the internal mammary region, reduced the risk of disease-free survival and breast cancer-specific mortality. Therefore, the adjuvant radiotherapy strategy for early breast cancer patients with low-burden sentinel lymph node metastasis remains controversial, with a lack of high-level evidence to support it.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection alone , clinical low risk group | Experimental | patients treated with surgery and Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection alone with positive lymph node metastasis. | |
| Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection alone , clinical high risk but genomic low risk group | Experimental | patients treated with surgery and Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection alone with positive lymph node metastasis. | |
| Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection alone ,clinical high risk and genomic high risk group | Experimental | patients treated with surgery and Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection alone with positive lymph node metastasis. | |
| with Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection(SLND) + axillary lymph node dissection(ALND) | Active Comparator | patients treated with surgery and Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection and ALND with positive lymph node metastasis. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SLND(clinical low risk) | Radiation | treated with whole breast irradiation(WBI)alone 50Gy/25Fx + 10Gy/5Fx or 40Gy/15Fx + 10Gy/4Fx or no PMRT | ||
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of patients with arm lymphedema | Incidence of ipsilateral arm lymphedema 1 year after the completion of adjuvant radiotherapy | 2 year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Disease free survival | Number of patients with an oncological event (local, regional and distant recurrence free survival) | 5 years |
| Overall survival | Number of patient alive after 5 years of follow up |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
• Pathologically positive ipsilateral supraclavicular lymph node
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ruijin hospital, Shanghai jiaotong university school of medicine | Shanghai | China | 200025 | China |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| SLND(clinical high risk, genomic low risk) |
| Radiation |
treated with whole breast irradiation(WBI)/Post-Mastectomy Adjuvant Radiotherapy(PMRT) + regional node irradiation (Axillary +supraclavicular radiotherapy),the radiation dose could be conventional radiation or hypo-fraction irradiation:50Gy/25Fx + 10Gy/5Fx or 40Gy/15Fx + 10Gy/4Fx |
| SLND alone ,clinical high risk and genomic high risk group | Radiation | treated with whole breast irradiation(WBI)/Post-Mastectomy Adjuvant Radiotherapy(PMRT) + regional node irradiation (Internal Mammary Node Irradiation+ axillary +supraclavicular radiotherapy),the radiation dose could be conventional radiation or hypo-fraction irradiation:50Gy/25Fx + 10Gy/5Fx or 40Gy/15Fx + 10Gy/4Fx |
| Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection(SLND) + axillary lymph node dissection(ALND) | Radiation | treated with whole breast irradiation(WBI)/Post-Mastectomy Adjuvant Radiotherapy(PMRT) + regional node irradiation (Internal Mammary Node +supraclavicular radiotherapy),the radiation dose could be conventional radiation or hypo-fraction irradiation:50Gy/25Fx + 10Gy/5Fx or 40Gy/15Fx + 10Gy/4Fx |
|
| 5-year |