The Impact of Provisionalization Using Glass Fiber Reinforced Composite on Patient Satisfaction and Prosthetic Complications in Maxillary Implant-Supported Arches Restored by Definitive Pekkton Frameworks
The Impact of Provisionalization Using Glass Fiber Reinforced Composite on Patient Satisfaction and Prosthetic Complications in Maxillary Implant-Supported Arches Restored by Definitive Pekkton Frameworks
This study aims to evaluate the effect of provisionalization with a glass fiber composite framework on patient satisfaction and prosthetic complications before the insertion of a definitive PEKKTON framework when used under the screw-retained maxillary implant-supported prostheses at a one-year follow-up period.
Patient grouping:
Group I: (intervention) Patients obtained an Implant-supported full arch maxillary provisional prosthesis protocol utilizing 6 implants for constructing a resin glass fiber composite framework followed by a definitive PEKKTON framework.
Group II: (control) patients obtained an Implant-supported, full arch maxillary definitive prosthesis utilizing 6 implants, for constructing PEKKTON framework without provisionalization.
Preparation of a scan appliance:
Virtual planning, surgical guide fabrication, and Implant placement
Prosthetic procedures: After 1 Month:
Framework fabrication:
A. Digital impressions Scan bodies will be tightened onto the multi-unit abutments and an intraoral digital impression will be made using an IOS system after one month of implant insertion.
B. Verification jigs fabrication (digitally) The milled PMMA jig will be constructed and checked for passive seating on implants by verifying proper contact at the PMMA jig interface and the multi-unit abutments.
C. Framework fabrication:
Inclusion Criteria:
a. Completely edentulous patients with Angle's Class I maxillomandibular relationship b. Age ranges from 40 to 65 years old. c. Adequate zone of keratinized attached mucosa (≥ 8mm) over the maxillary crest.
d. Absence of any medical disorder that could complicate the surgical phase or affect osseointegration.
e. The patient must have enough bone height for implants, a minimum length of bone f. 12 mm, and a minimum diameter of bone 6 mm. g. Patients with good oral hygiene. h. Complete denture wearer. i. Adequate interarch space for screw-retained prosthesis. j. Absence of any intra-oral pathological condition.
Exclusion Criteria:
- a. Patients with recent extraction (less than three months). b. Patients with an inflamed ridge or candida infection c. Patients with the flabby ridge. d. Para functional habits. e. Cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. f. Patients with uncontrolled diabetes, assessed by measuring glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c ≥ 7) g. Potentially uncooperative patients who are not willing to go through the proposed interventions.
h. Moderate-to-heavy daily smokers (more than ten per day)
nora.sheta@dentistry.cu.edu.eg+201224552363
huda.fakhry@dentistry.cu.edu.eg+201006229611