Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Memorial University of Newfoundland | OTHER |
| University of Groningen | OTHER |
| Flinders University | OTHER |
| Concordia University, Montreal |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Unaddressed age-related hearing loss is highly prevalent among older adults, typified by negative consequences for speech-in-noise perception and psychosocial wellbeing. There is promising evidence that group singing may enhance speech-in-noise perception and psychosocial wellbeing. However, there is a lack of robust evidence, primarily due to the literature being based on small sample sizes, single site studies, and a lack of randomized controlled trials. Hence, to address these concerns, this SingWell Project study utilizes an appropriate sample size, multisite, randomized controlled trial approach, with a robust preplanned statistical analysis.
The objective of the study is to explore if group singing may improve speech-in-noise perception and psychosocial wellbeing for older adults with unaddressed hearing loss.
The investigators designed an international, multisite, randomized controlled trial to explore the benefits of group singing for adults aged 60 years and older with unaddressed hearing loss. After undergoing an eligibility screening process and completing an information and consent form, the investigators intend to recruit 210 participants that will be randomly assigned to either group singing or an audiobook club (control group) intervention for a training period of 12-weeks. The study has multiple timepoints for testing, that are broadly categorized as macro (i.e., pre- and post-measures across the 12-weeks), or micro timepoints (i.e., pre- and post-measures across a weekly training session). Macro measures include behavioural measures of speech and music perception, and psychosocial questionnaires. Micro measures include psychosocial questionnaires and heart-rate variability.
The investigators hypothesize that group singing may be effective at improving speech perception and psychosocial outcomes for older adults with unaddressed hearing loss-more so than participants in the control group.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group Singing | Experimental | 12 week group singing program consisting of 1.5 hours of in-person choir instruction per week. |
|
| Audiobook Club | Active Comparator | 12 week group program consisting of 1.5 hours of in-person audiobook club discussion per week. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group Singing | Behavioral | 12 week choir program consisting of 1.5 hours of in-person instruction per week. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Speech-in-noise perception | The Coordinate Response Matrix (CRM) generates signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). A lower SNR is indicative of better speech-in-noise perception. | Baseline and completion (week 0 and week 13) |
| Emotional speech perception | The EmoHI is calculated as the mean accuracy of correct responses as a percentage (0 to 100%). | Baseline and completion (week 0 and week 13) |
| Quality of Life/Wellness | The 12-item short-form survey version 2 (SF-12v2) from the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) generates a Physical Summary and a Mental Summary of patient quality of life. Scores range from 0 to 100, where a zero score indicates the lowest level of health and 100 indicates the highest level of health. | Baseline and completion (week 0 and week 13) |
| Anxiety and Depression | The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) provides a score between 0 and 21, with higher scores indicative of higher levels of anxiety or depression. | Baseline and completion (week 0 and week 13) |
| Self Esteem | The Collective Self-Esteem Scale (CSES) consists of four scales: Membership self-esteem, Private collective self-esteem, Public collective self-esteem, and Importance to Identity. Each scale is scored between 1 and 7, with a higher score indicating high levels of self-esteem. | Baseline and completion (week 0 and week 13) |
| Social Connectedness | The revised Social Connectedness Scale (SCS-R) is scored as a total between 8 and 48 points, with higher scores indicating higher levels of social connectedness. |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Heart rate variability and social bonding | Heart rate variability (HRV) is a proxy measure of social bonding. Higher HRV is anticipated to be associated with higher levels of social bonding. | Pre- and post-session (week 2, 7, 11) |
Inclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chi Yhun Lo, PhD | Contact | 4169795000 | 554989 | chi.lo@torontomu.ca |
| Kay F Wright-Whyte, MSc | Contact | 4169795000 | 554989 | kww@torontomu.ca |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Frank Russo, PhD | Toronto Metropolitan University | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brain and Creativity Institute, University of Southern California | Not yet recruiting | Los Angeles | California | 90089 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39630812 | Derived | Lo CY, Zendel BR, Baskent D, Boyle C, Coffey E, Gagne N, Habibi A, Harding E, Keijzer M, Kreutz G, Maat B, Schurig E, Sharma M, Dang C, Gilmore S, Henshaw H, McKay CM, Good A, Russo FA. Speech-in-noise, psychosocial, and heart rate variability outcomes of group singing or audiobook club interventions for older adults with unaddressed hearing loss: A SingWell Project multisite, randomized controlled trial, registered report protocol. PLoS One. 2024 Dec 4;19(12):e0314473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314473. eCollection 2024. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011304 | Presbycusis |
| D013065 | Speech Intelligibility |
| D034381 | Hearing Loss |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006319 | Hearing Loss, Sensorineural |
| D006311 | Hearing Disorders |
| D004427 | Ear Diseases |
| D010038 | Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| University of Southern California | OTHER |
| University of Oldenburg | OTHER |
| University of Nottingham | OTHER |
| The Bionics Institute of Australia | OTHER |
12 week RCT exploring the benefits of group singing and an audiobook club (1.5 hours per week)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Audiobook Club | Behavioral | 12 week audiobook club program consisting of 1.5 hours of in-person discussion per week. |
|
| Baseline and completion (week 0 and week 13) |
| Pitch perception | The Frequency Difference Limen (FDL) task evaluates pitch perception threshold. A lower threshold indicates better pitch perception abilities. | Baseline and completion (week 0 and week 13) |
| Rhythm perception | The Beat Alignment Test (BAT) measures rhythm perception accuracy between 0 and 100%. | Baseline and completion (week 0 and week 13) |
| Timbre perception | The Spectral-temporally Modulated Ripple Test (SMRT) is a proxy measure of timbre perception. It generates a threshold based on performance. A higher ripple-per-octave threshold is indicative of better spectro-temporal (timbre) perception. | Baseline and completion (week 0 and week 13) |
| Higher-level Music perception | The Music-in-Noise Task (MINT) is an auditory stream segregation task that is a proxy measure of higher-level music perception. It is scored as proportion correct between 0 and 1. | Baseline and completion (week 0 and week 13) |
| Positive and Negative Affect | The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) consists of a positive and negative outcome measure; each ranging between 10 and 50. For the positive scale, a higher score represents higher levels of positive affect. One the negative scale, a lower score represents lower levels of negative affect. | Pre- and post-session (week 2, 7, 11) |
| Anxiety and Discomfort | The Subjective Units of Discomfort Scale (SUDS) is scored between 0 and 100, with descriptive anchor points. 0 = "no anxiety, calm, relaxed"; 25 = "mild anxiety, alert, able to cope"; 50 = "moderate anxiety, some trouble concentrating"; 75 = "severe anxiety, thoughts of leaving"; and 100 = "very severe anxiety, worst ever experienced". | Pre- and post-session (week 2, 7, 11) |
| Social closeness | The Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale (IOS) is scored between 1 and 7, with a higher score representing more social closeness. | Pre- and post-session (week 2, 7, 11) |
| Flinders University | Not yet recruiting | Adelaide | South Australia | 5042 | Australia |
|
| Memorial University of Newfoundland | Not yet recruiting | St. John's | Newfoundland and Labrador | A1C 5S7 | Canada |
|
| Toronto Metropolitan University | Recruiting | Toronto | Ontario | M5B 2K3 | Canada |
|
| Concordia University | Not yet recruiting | Montreal | Quebec | H3G 1M8 | Canada |
|
| Carl von Ossietzky Universitat Oldenburg | Not yet recruiting | Oldenburg | D-26129 | Germany |
|
| University of Groningen | Recruiting | Groningen | 9700 AB | Netherlands |
|
| D012678 | Sensation Disorders |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D013060 | Speech |
| D014705 | Verbal Behavior |
| D003142 | Communication |
| D001519 | Behavior |