Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
**Study Goal:** The purpose of this clinical trial is to determine if combining high-frequency micro-ultrasound with multiparametric MRI biopsy and a systematic biopsy can better detect clinically significant prostate cancer compared to current standard methods. This study is aimed at men who may have prostate cancer.
**Main Questions the Study Aims to Answer:**
**Participation in the Study:**
Participants in this study will undergo the following procedures:
**Comparison Group:** Researchers will compare the new combination method with the current standard method to see if the new approach is more effective.
**Participants will:**
The primary objective of this study is (i) to demonstrate that the combination of highfrequency micro-ultrasound target biopsy, multiparametric MRI target biopsy, and systematic biopsy detects more clinically significant prostate cancer (>= ISUP 2) than multiparametric MRI target biopsy and systematic biopsy alone (current standard of care).
The secondary objective of this study is (ii) to demonstrate that the combination of high frequency micro-ultrasound target biopsy, multiparametric MRI target biopsy, and systematic biopsy does not detect more clinically insignificant prostate cancer (ISUP 1) than multiparametric MRI target biopsy and systematic biopsy alone (current standard of care).
The third objective of this study is (iii) to demonstrate that the combination of highfrequency micro-ultrasound target biopsy and multiparametric MRI target biopsy does not detect less clinically significant prostate cancer (>= ISUP 2) than multiparametric MRI target biopsy and systematic biopsy (current standard of care).
The fourth objective of this study is (iv) to demonstrate that the combination of highfrequency micro-ultrasound target biopsy and multiparametric MRI target biopsy detects less clinically insignificant prostate cancer (ISUP 1) than the combination of multiparametric MRI target biopsy and systematic biopsy (current standard of care).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group U | Experimental | Use of high-frequency micro-ultrasound target biopsy, multiparametric MRI target biopsy and systematic biopsy for tumor detection |
|
| Group S | Active Comparator | Use of multiparametric MRI target biopsy and systematic biopsy (current standard of care) for tumor detection |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High-frequency micro-ultrasound target biopsy | Device |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer via Prostate Biopsy | This measure assesses whether participants have clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason Score Sum ≥ ISUP 2) based on biopsy results, recorded as "yes" or "no". | 2 Weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Detection of Clinically Insignificant Prostate Cancer via Prostate Biopsy | This measure evaluates whether participants have clinically insignificant prostate cancer (Gleason Score Sum = ISUP 1) based on biopsy results, also recorded as "yes" or "no". | 2 Weeks |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
- Men with suspected clinically significant prostate cancer, identified by the rise in PSA level, suspicious digital rectal examination or both and pathologic multiparametric MRI of the prostate (>= PI-RADS III)
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Uniklinikum Salzburg, Department for Urology and Andrology | Recruiting | Salzburg | State of Salzburg | 5020 | Austria |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 32321669 | Background | Carioli G, Bertuccio P, Boffetta P, Levi F, La Vecchia C, Negri E, Malvezzi M. European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2020 with a focus on prostate cancer. Ann Oncol. 2020 May;31(5):650-658. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Apr 19. | |
| 19885309 | Background | Kim JK, Jang YJ, Cho G. Multidisciplinary functional MR imaging for prostate cancer. Korean J Radiol. 2009 Nov-Dec;10(6):535-51. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2009.10.6.535. |
Not provided
Not provided
No individual participant data (IPD) will be shared with other researchers. The data collected from participants will remain confidential and will be used exclusively for the analysis and reporting within the confines of this study. This approach ensures the privacy and security of participant information.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants are randomly divided into two groups. One group (the experimental group) receives the combination of high-frequency micro-ultrasound, multiparametric MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy. The other group (the control group) receives the current standard care, which includes only multiparametric MRI-targeted biopsy and systematic biopsy. This setup allows direct comparison of the detection rates of clinically significant prostate cancer between the new combination of interventions and the standard approach.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| conventional Multiparametric MRT target biopsy | Device |
|
|
| 31130434 | Background | Kasivisvanathan V, Stabile A, Neves JB, Giganti F, Valerio M, Shanmugabavan Y, Clement KD, Sarkar D, Philippou Y, Thurtle D, Deeks J, Emberton M, Takwoingi Y, Moore CM. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy Versus Systematic Biopsy in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2019 Sep;76(3):284-303. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.04.043. Epub 2019 May 24. |
| 30470502 | Background | Rouviere O, Puech P, Renard-Penna R, Claudon M, Roy C, Mege-Lechevallier F, Decaussin-Petrucci M, Dubreuil-Chambardel M, Magaud L, Remontet L, Ruffion A, Colombel M, Crouzet S, Schott AM, Lemaitre L, Rabilloud M, Grenier N; MRI-FIRST Investigators. Use of prostate systematic and targeted biopsy on the basis of multiparametric MRI in biopsy-naive patients (MRI-FIRST): a prospective, multicentre, paired diagnostic study. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Jan;20(1):100-109. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30569-2. Epub 2018 Nov 21. |
| 26791931 | Background | Ghai S, Eure G, Fradet V, Hyndman ME, McGrath T, Wodlinger B, Pavlovich CP. Assessing Cancer Risk on Novel 29 MHz Micro-Ultrasound Images of the Prostate: Creation of the Micro-Ultrasound Protocol for Prostate Risk Identification. J Urol. 2016 Aug;196(2):562-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.093. Epub 2016 Jan 12. |
| 32314932 | Background | Rodriguez Socarras ME, Gomez Rivas J, Cuadros Rivera V, Reinoso Elbers J, Llanes Gonzalez L, Michel Mercado I, Fernandez Del Alamo J, Juarez Del Dago P, Sancha FG. Prostate Mapping for Cancer Diagnosis: The Madrid Protocol. Transperineal Prostate Biopsies Using Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion and Micro-Ultrasound Guided Biopsies. J Urol. 2020 Oct;204(4):726-733. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001083. Epub 2020 Apr 21. |
| 31309290 | Background | Abouassaly R, Klein EA, El-Shefai A, Stephenson A. Impact of using 29 MHz high-resolution micro-ultrasound in real-time targeting of transrectal prostate biopsies: initial experience. World J Urol. 2020 May;38(5):1201-1206. doi: 10.1007/s00345-019-02863-y. Epub 2019 Jul 15. |
| 31771935 | Background | Laurence Klotz CM. Can high resolution micro-ultrasound replace MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer? Eur Urol Focus. 2020 Mar 15;6(2):419-423. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2019.11.006. Epub 2019 Nov 24. |
| 32350662 | Background | Cornud F, Lefevre A, Flam T, Dumonceau O, Galiano M, Soyer P, Camparo P, Barral M. MRI-directed high-frequency (29MhZ) TRUS-guided biopsies: initial results of a single-center study. Eur Radiol. 2020 Sep;30(9):4838-4846. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06882-x. Epub 2020 Apr 29. |
| 32654967 | Background | Wiemer L, Hollenbach M, Heckmann R, Kittner B, Plage H, Reimann M, Asbach P, Friedersdorff F, Schlomm T, Hofbauer S, Cash H. Evolution of Targeted Prostate Biopsy by Adding Micro-Ultrasound to the Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pathway. Eur Urol Focus. 2021 Nov;7(6):1292-1299. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2020.06.022. Epub 2020 Jul 9. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011471 | Prostatic Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005834 | Genital Neoplasms, Male |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D005832 | Genital Diseases, Male |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D011469 | Prostatic Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided