Sustained Inflation and Chest Compression Versus 3:1 Chest Compression to Ventilation Ratio During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation of Asphyxiated Newborns - a Multi-centre, International Cluster Randomized Control Trial
Sustained Inflation and Chest Compression Versus 3:1 Chest Compression to Ventilation Ratio During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation of Asphyxiated Newborns - a Multi-centre, International Cluster Randomized Control Trial
Newborn infants who require cardiopulmonary resuscitation at birth receive chest compression using a 3-Compression to 1-Ventilation (3:1 C:V) ratio. However, the optimal chest compression technique during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is uncertain and identified as a critical gap in evidence.
The International Consensus Statement advises to use the 3:1 C:V ratio based on animal studies, and states that there are no clinical trials to support this approach and called for more research. There continues to be uncertainty about the optimal chest compression technique during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
This trial will compare if in newborn infants with cardiac arrest in the delivery room does providing CC+SI (a new chest compression technique) compared to 3:1 C:V decreases the incidence of all mortality within the initial hospital stay.
This will be a multi-centre international cluster randomized trial.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
- Newborns born outside of study centers and transported to centers after delivery.
Sex, race, and ethnicity are not part of the exclusion criteria for this trial, and as such it should represent the combined demographics of all centers involved.
caroline.fray@albertahealthservices.ca+1 (780) 613-5237