Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is a common debilitating orthopedic condition that disrupts physical function and decreases quality of life. Not all CAI is the same. It can be mechanical ligamentous laxity, perceived disability often referred to as functional instability, or a combination of the two. However, clinicians and researchers most often combine all chronic ankle instability patients without considering these sub-groups, which may account for poor recovery and recurrence. The objective of this research is to determine functional and neurophysiological differences between sub-groups of CAI to allow for development of evidence-based rehabilitation which may improve patient outcomes.
To accomplish this, the study will determine the differences among CAI sub-groups on performance of a traditional side-hop test and neurocognitive hop test, determine differences in neurophysiological response and motor control between CAI sub-groups during a lower limb and an ankle specific task, and determine the underlying neurophysiological effects of a 4-week neurocognitively enhanced balance training protocol among CAI subgroups. Time to complete each of the hop tests, cortical activation during the balance and force control tasks, and neurocognitive performance will be assessed to determine differences in performance and neurological function among subgroups of CAI
Chronic ankle instability (CAI) is a common debilitating orthopedic condition that disrupts physical function and decreases quality of life. CAI is heterogenous and can manifest as mechanical ligamentous laxity, perceived disability often referred to as functional instability, or a combination of the two. However, clinicians and researchers most often combine all chronic ankle instability patients without considering these sub-groups, which may account for the poor recovery and recurrent nature of this pathology. Neurocognitive and neurophysiologic discrepancies may explain the different sub-groups; however, technological limitations have previously limited this assessment. The objective of this research is to determine functional and neurophysiological differences between sub-groups of CAI to allow for development of evidence-based rehabilitation which may improve patient outcomes.
To accomplish this, the study will determine the differences among CAI sub-groups on performance of a traditional side-hop test and neurocognitive hop test, determine differences in neurophysiological response and motor control between CAI sub-groups during a lower limb and an ankle specific task, and determine the underlying neurophysiological effects of a 4-week neurocognitively enhanced balance training protocol among CAI subgroups. This study hypothesizes functional performance will be similar between sub-groups during a traditional side-hop test, but those with functional instability without mechanical laxity will perform worse during a choice-reaction hop test compared to those with mechanical ankle instability. It also hypothesizes individuals with functional ankle instability will demonstrate greater cortical activation during the research tasks and after a 4-week balance training protocol compared to individuals with mechanical ankle instability. Time to complete each of the hop tests, cortical activation during the balance and force control tasks, and neurocognitive performance will be assessed to determine differences in performance and neurological function among subgroups of CAI.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Balance Training | Experimental | Exercises include (1) single-limb hops to stabilization, (2) hop to stabilization and reach, (3) unanticipated hop to stabilization, (4) single-limb stance activities, and (5) continuous choice-reaction hopping. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Physical Rehabilitation | Other | Exercises include (1) single-limb hops to stabilization, (2) hop to stabilization and reach, (3) unanticipated hop to stabilization, (4) single-limb stance activities, and (5) continuous choice-reaction hopping. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Side-hop Test | Amount of time it takes participants to hop medially and laterally across a 30-cm gap ten times will be measured. Greater times equals worse performance. | Baseline and post-rehabilitation (six weeks total) |
| Choice-reaction Hop Test | Amount of time it takes participants hop on a mat medially and laterally across a 30-cm gap ten times, using visual cues to direct movement to one of two squares on each side. Greater times equals worse performance. | Baseline and post-rehabilitation (six weeks total) |
| Inversion-eversion Force Control | The force control accuracy at 50% maximal contraction for eversion and inversion will be determined. This is analyzed by a non-linear analysis Lyapunov exponent (LyE) which measures the quality or the natural, inherent fluctuations in movement. Greater values indicate reduced neuromuscular control. | Baseline and post-rehabilitation (six weeks total) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool | Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), a 9-item scale, will be used to measure the severity of functional ankle instability. It is scored from 0 to 30. Higher scores indicate a better outcome. | Baseline and post-rehabilitation (six weeks total) |
| Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Activities of Daily Living (FAAM-ADL) Scale |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
All participants must be physically active (participation in at least 90 total minutes of activity/week including running, walking, lifting weights, or playing a sport, etc.)
Healthy controls:
Coper participants (participants coping with ankle problems:
Chronic ankle instability (CAI):
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Adam B Rosen, PhD | University of Nebraska | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Nebraska-Omaha, Biomechanics Research Building | Omaha | Nebraska | 68182 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016512 | Ankle Injuries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007869 | Leg Injuries |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Participants will be enrolled into one of three groups based on ankle instability: mechanical instability, functional ankle instability and Coper (sprained ankle, but no residual symptoms as a comparison). Participants will complete a 4-week balance training protocol. Prior to and following the training protocol the following tasks will be completed to evaluate the training: patient-reported functioning in daily life and sports, neurocognitive hop-testing, force-control, and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Activities of Daily Living Scale will be used to assess physical function in activities of daily living (ADL) for individuals with foot and ankle impairments. It is a patient-reported outcome instrument that is scored as a percentage from 0% to 100%. Higher scores indicate a better outcome. |
| Baseline and post-rehabilitation (six weeks total) |
| Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Sport (FAAM-Sport) Scale | The Foot and Ankle Ability Measure Activities of Daily Living Scale will be used to assess physical function in sports activities for individuals with foot and ankle impairments. It is a patient-reported outcome instrument that is scored as a percentage from 0% to 100%. Higher scores indicate a better outcome. | Baseline and post-rehabilitation (six weeks total) |