Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1R01DA054145-01A1 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this study is to disentangle relationships between acute cannabis use and withdrawal on proximal depression and suicide risk and recovery in adolescents ages 12-18 years by incorporating time-varying patterns of substance use, mood, and SI. This project aims to guide the development of scalable, individualized, accessible, and affordable interventions aimed to reduce depression and suicide risk among adolescents.
We will recruit 200 community-based adolescents, ages 12-18 years, with daily or near daily cannabis use and current depression symptoms. Participants will be enrolled in a 10-week, 3-phased, mixed-methods protocol. All participants will complete a 2 week baseline phase (Phase 1) involving real-time, ambulatory smartphone monitoring (ecological momentary assessment; EMA) during which they will use cannabis per usual to quantify the temporal relationship between use and mood and SI, and the within- (e.g., concurrent other substance use, social context of use) and between-subject factors (e.g., severity of cannabis use, depression and SI) that moderate these linkages. We will work with participants schedule to ensure that the start of this 2-week baseline phase coincides with when they do not anticipate any major deviations from their typical pattern of cannabis use (e.g., family vacation, exam week). After the baseline phase, participants will be scheduled for the randomization component of the study, which will employ a 2-arm, within-subject, parallel group design to examine the effects of short- and longer-term cannabis withdrawal across 8 weeks of cannabis abstinence on depression and SI. Participants will be randomized to 8 weeks of abstinence with contingency management (CB-Abst; n=100) or non-contingent monitoring with no abstinence requirement (CBMon; n=100). Randomization will occur in a 1:1 ratio in blocks of 6 based on a computerized scheme developed by the study statistician. Randomization will be stratified by age, sex, and depression severity. A key aspect of the approach is that the 8-week period is long enough to observe true changes due to cannabis discontinuation, separate from effects of cannabis withdrawal, and residual cannabinoid exposure. Both groups will complete 1-week of EMA in weeks 1 (Phase 2) and 8 (Phase 3) of the randomized study period. In addition to the 3 waves of smartphone, EMA data collection, participants will complete 12 study visits across ~10 weeks. Visits will entail collection of urine samples for verification of self-reported use and abstinence verification (for CB-Abst during the randomization phase), as well as brief questionnaires and interviews on interim substance use, craving, withdrawal, mood symptoms, and SI.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cannabis Abstinence (CB-Abst) | Experimental | Those randomized to the abstinence condition will be asked to stop using cannabis for eight weeks. They will participate in a contingency management protocol, which uses an escalating remuneration schedule to incentivize abstinence. Abstinence is confirmed biochemically via progressively decreasing values of creatinine-adjusted THCCOOH. |
|
| Cannabis Monitoring (CB-Mon) | No Intervention | Those randomized to the monitoring condition will be asked to make no changes to their cannabis use frequency or dose for the duration of the eight week study. | |
| Pre-intervention Pooled Groups (EMA Phase 1 Only) | No Intervention | All enrolled participants will participate in approximately two weeks of EMA data collection prior to being randomized and starting intervention procedures to characterize mood during baseline use as usual (CB-Abst or CB-Mon). |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Contingency management for cannabis abstinence | Behavioral | Those randomized to the abstinence condition (CB-Abst) will be incentivized using an escalating reinforcement schedule for eight weeks of cannabis abstinence. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Aim 1: Cannabis use in the last hour | Responses will be collected via ecological momentary assessment based on 7-9 random prompts a day. The outcome is a binary rating as to whether cannabis was used in the last hour, either 0 (No use) or 1 (Use in the last hour). We will examine data from all participants prior to randomization to experimental arms (Pre-intervention Pooled Groups arm). | Weeks 1 - 2 (EMA Phase 1; Baseline Use as Usual) |
| Aim 1: Motivation to use cannabis to improve mood collected | Responses will be collected via ecological momentary assessment based on 7-9 random prompts a day. We will use the subset of responses following cannabis use in the last hour. The outcome is a rating for whether cannabis was used to improve negative mood, from 1 (No, not at all) to 100 (Yes, very much). Higher ratings indicate greater motivation to use cannabis to improve negative mood. We will examine data from all participants prior to randomization to experimental arms (Pre-intervention Pooled Groups arm). | Weeks 1 - 2 (EMA Phase 1; Baseline Use as Usual) |
| Aim 2: Depleted mood | Responses will be collected via ecological momentary assessment based on 7-9 random prompts a day. The outcome is a composite score of depleted mood computed as the average over 5 ratings each assessed on a 0 (No, not at all) - 100 (Yes, very much) scale with the following question prompt: Right now how much do you feel [MOOD] (sub in Sad/Self-hatred/Numb/Hopeless/Fatigued). Higher ratings indicate worse feelings of depleted mood. We will examine data for participants split between the two experimental arms (CB-Abst versus CB-Mon). | Weeks 1 - 3, Week 10 (EMA Phase 2-3; Randomized Withdrawal then Sustained Abstinence) |
| Aim 2: Negative cognitive impact | Responses will be collected via ecological momentary assessment based on 7-9 random prompts a day. The outcome is a composite score of negative cognitive impact computed as the average over 2 ratings each assessed on a 0 (No, not at all) - 100 (Yes, very much) scale with the following question prompt: Right now how much do you feel [MOOD] (sub in Disinterested/Inattentive). Higher ratings indicate worse feelings of negative cognitive impact. We will examine data for participants split between the two experimental arms (CB-Abst versus CB-Mon). |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Randi M Schuster, PhD | Contact | 617-643-6673 | rschuster@mgh.harvard.edu | |
| Julia Jashinski, MSW | Contact | 617-643-1984 | jjashinski@mgh.harvard.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Randi M Schuster, PhD | Massachusetts General Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts General Hopsital | Recruiting | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 41411314 | Derived | Feibus I, Mahiques MB, Costello M, Potter K, Bentley KH, Hoeppner BB, Liu L, Evohr B, Yan L, Gilman J, Evins AE, Kossowsky J, Schuster RM. Characterizing proximal risk for depressive symptoms and suicidal ideation with acute cannabis use and withdrawal among adolescents using ecological momentary assessment: Study protocol. PLoS One. 2025 Dec 18;20(12):e0338790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338790. eCollection 2025. |
Not provided
Not provided
As outlined in the approved Data Management and Sharing Plan, IPD will be deposited in the NIMH Data Archive. This is a free data repository open to qualified researchers from all mental health and other research communities to share, archive, cite, access, and explore research data. Clinical data necessary to validate and replicate research findings, including questionnaires, interviews, ecological momentary assessment data, urine drug test results, and Fitbit recordings, will be shared.
Scientific data will be available one year after the grant end date specified on the first Notice of Award. Scientific data included in published manuscripts will be made available at the time of publication. Scientific data and the code/software/tools used to development the published or submitted dataset will be shared at the time of data submission or publication and maintained for no shorter than five years.
Data access will be controlled. In order to access shared data, qualified researchers will be required to complete a data use certification and receive approval from NDA Data Access Committee.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003863 | Depression |
| D059020 | Suicidal Ideation |
| D000294 | Adolescent Behavior |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001526 | Behavioral Symptoms |
| D001519 | Behavior |
| D013405 | Suicide |
| D016728 | Self-Injurious Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
Following a shared two-week baseline assessment period (Arm 1) for all enrolled participants, participants will be split into 2 arms, randomly assigned to one of two interventions (Arms 2 or 3, CB-Abst or CB-Mon).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Weeks 1 - 3, Week 10 (EMA Phase 2-3; Randomized Withdrawal then Sustained Abstinence) |
| Aim 2: Negative activation | Responses will be collected via ecological momentary assessment based on 7-9 random prompts a day. The outcome is a composite score of negative activation computed as the average over 3 ratings each assessed on a 0 (No, not at all) - 100 (Yes, very much) scale with the following question prompt: Right now how much do you feel [MOOD] (sub in Agitated/Irritated/Anxious). Higher ratings indicate worse feelings of negative activation. We will examine data for participants split between the two experimental arms (CB-Abst versus CB-Mon). | Weeks 1 - 3, Week 10 (EMA Phase 2-3; Randomized Withdrawal then Sustained Abstinence) |
| Aim 2: Passive suicidal ideation | Responses will be collected via ecological momentary assessment based on 7-9 random prompts a day. The outcome is a composite score of passive suicidal ideation computed as the average over 3 ratings each assessed on a 0 (No, not at all) - 100 (Yes, very much) scale with the following question prompt: Right now how strong is your [IDEATION] (sub in Thoughts about death/Wishing suffering could be over/Better off as dead). Higher ratings indicate worse passive suicidal ideation. We will examine data for participants split between the two experimental arms (CB-Abst versus CB-Mon). | Weeks 1 - 3, Week 10 (EMA Phase 2-3; Randomized Withdrawal then Sustained Abstinence) |
| Aim 2: Suicidal urges | Responses will be collected via ecological momentary assessment based on 7-9 random prompts a day. The outcome is a rating to the following prompt: right now how strong is your intention to kill yourself, from 0 (No, not at all) to 100 (Yes, very much). Higher ratings indicate worse suicidal urges. We will examine data for participants split between the two experimental arms (CB-Abst versus CB-Mon). | Weeks 1 - 3, Week 10 (EMA Phase 2-3; Randomized Withdrawal then Sustained Abstinence) |
| Aim 2: Non-suicidal self-injury urges | Responses will be collected via ecological momentary assessment based on 7-9 random prompts a day. The outcome is a rating to the following prompt: right now how strong is your desire to hurt your body, from 0 (No, not at all) to 100 (Yes, very much). Higher ratings indicate worse self-injury urges. We will examine data for participants split between the two experimental arms (CB-Abst versus CB-Mon). | Weeks 1 - 3, Week 10 (EMA Phase 2-3; Randomized Withdrawal then Sustained Abstinence) |