Radical Versus Conservative Surgery in Liver Cystic Echinococcosis: a Prospective Cohort Study in a High-volume Western Centre
Radical Versus Conservative Surgery in Liver Cystic Echinococcosis: a Prospective Cohort Study in a High-volume Western Centre
The goal of this observational study is to compare the results in terms of morbidity and disease-free survival between groups of patients with liver cystic echinococcosis (LCE) managed with radical surgery (RS) or conservative surgery (CS), and to evaluate potential risk factors of clinically relevant biliary fistula and liver recurrence.
Main hypothesis:
Radical surgery (RS) in LCE has better postoperative results than conservative surgery (CS) in terms of global morbidity, specific morbidity and liver recurrence rate.
Secondary hypotheses:
It is possible to identify preoperative and intraoperative prognostic factors of higher morbidity and recurrence rate.
The location of the residual pericystic layer in CS is related to a higher incidence of liver recurrence.
The percentage of residual pericystic layer in CS is related to a higher incidence of postoperative biliary fistula.
Main outcome:
Secondary outcomes:
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: