Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of implementing post operative enhanced recovery on perforated peptic ulcer surgery outcome.
The current study anticipated better outcomes in the form of early functional recovery, reduced length of hospital stays, less thirty days post operative morbidity, and better gastrointestinal quality of life after implementing post operative enhanced recovery in patients with perforated peptic ulcer.
This study aimed to evaluate the effect of implementing post operative enhanced recovery on perforated peptic ulcer surgery outcomes.
Methods: Quasi- experimental research design was utilized. The study was conducted at Assiut University Hospital.
A purposive sample of thirty patients (study group) who received postoperative enhanced recovery after open surgical repair of perforated peptic ulcer compared with thirty patients (control group) who exposed to routine care.
patient assessment sheet and gastrointestinal quality of life index were the tools used for data collection.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enhanced recovery group | Experimental | who received postoperative enhanced recovery after open surgical repair for perforated peptic ulcer |
|
| Control group | No Intervention | who exposed to standard care |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Post operative enhanced recovery elements | Procedure | According to the study group the researchers collaborated with surgeons, nurses, and anesthesiologists to implement post operative enhanced recovery protocol that defined clearly in the following elements Early nutrition, Early mobilization, Non-opioid analgesia. Early removal of abdominal drains and tubes throughout the patients' hospital stay up to their discharge. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Gastrointestinal functional recovery (first bowel movement) | Tool; Patient assessment sheet
| Within the first 24 hours postoperative or more |
| Gastrointestinal functional recovery(first flatus passage) | Tool; Patient assessment sheet
the mean score of time for two groups was compared | Within the first 24 hours postoperative or more |
| Gastrointestinal functional recovery(first stool passage) | Tool; Patient assessment sheet - It was developed by researchers based on literatures review to assess postoperative clinical data (part 2) as gastrointestinal functional recovery (first stool passage) postoperative.through health history. The mean score of time for two groups was compared | First stool passage within three days postoperative or more |
| postoperative complications | post operative complications included complications that occured within 30- days post operative. Every patient had been assessed for developing pneumonia, admission to critical care, abdominal collection, intra-abdominal abscess, suture leakage, omental patch leakage, septic shock, prolonged ileus, surgical site infection, urinary tract infection, deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and reoperation | Immediately post operative up to thirty days postoperative |
| Legnth of hospital stay | Hospitalization duration from admission up to discharge Mean score of days for two groups will be compared. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| gastrointestinal quality of life | gastrointestinal quality of life was evaluated for all patients before discharge and after thirty days postoperative using Gastrointestinal quality of life index (Eypasch, 1993). It is a 36-item scale divided into five domains; GIT symptoms (10 items), physical (6 items), emotion (6 items), social (2 items) and disease specific (8 items) Cronbach's alpha was 0.89 Scoring: Each item is based on a 0-4 Likert scale with 0 being least desirable to 4 being the most desirable option. The total scores represent Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index. It ranges from 0 to 144 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Mahmoud Ayoub, Ass. prof. | Assiut University -Assiut city | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faculty of Nursing | Asyut | 71111 | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40186297 | Derived | Desoky AA, Ayoub MT, Mostafa NM, Hashem EM, Mohammed MA. Short-term outcome following postoperative enhanced recovery implementation in patients with perforated peptic ulcer. Eur J Med Res. 2025 Apr 4;30(1):234. doi: 10.1186/s40001-025-02432-7. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010439 | Peptic Ulcer Perforation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010437 | Peptic Ulcer |
| D004378 | Duodenal Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| seven days up to two weeks |
| Before hospital dicharge and after thirty days postoperative |
| D004066 |
| Digestive System Diseases |
| D013272 | Stomach Diseases |