Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aimed to compare the efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) with that of wound infiltration (WI) for postoperative analgesia in lumbar spinal surgeries involving instrumentation.
In this randomized controlled trial, 80 patients were divided into two groups: ESPB (n=40) and WI (n=40). Postoperative pain intensity was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at multiple time points within 24 hours. Additionally, opioid consumption, time to first rescue analgesia, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and patient satisfaction were evaluated.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Erector Spinae Plane Block (Group E) | Active Comparator | ESPB was administered preoperatively under ultrasound guidance via a high-frequency linear probe (Sonosite M-Turbo, Fujifilm Sonosite Inc., USA) (Figure 1). The procedure was as follows:
|
|
| Wound infiltration (Group WI) | Active Comparator | Wound infiltration was performed by the surgeon at the end of the surgery via the following procedure:
|
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erector Spinae Plane Block(ESPB) | Procedure | ESPB was administered preoperatively under ultrasound guidance via a high-frequency linear probe (Sonosite M-Turbo, Fujifilm Sonosite Inc., USA) (Figure 1). The procedure was as follows:
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Postoperative pain intensity | The pain intensity was assessed via the visual analog scale (VAS).The VAS is a 10 cm scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). | 1., 6., 12., 24., and 48. hours postoperatively |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Total Opioid Consumption | Recorded as morphine equivalents | In the first 48 hours postoperatively |
| Time to first request for rescue analgesia | Noted in hours postoperatively |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Yücel Yüce, MD,Assoc Prf | Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi | Istanbul | Turkey (Türkiye) |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 39407122 | Derived | Yuce Y, Karakus SA, Simsek T, Onal C, Sezen O, Cevik B, Aydogmus E. Comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block versus wound infiltration for postoperative analgesia in instrumented lumbar spinal surgeries. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Oct 15;24(1):374. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02754-9. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants
Eligible participants were adults aged 18-70 years who were scheduled for elective lumbar spinal surgery with instrumentation. The inclusion criteria were as follows:
The exclusion criteria were as follows:
Not provided
Not provided
Randomization and Blinding A computer-generated random number sequence was used for randomization. Allocation was concealed via sealed, opaque envelopes, which were opened just before the intervention. Both the patients and the outcome assessors were blinded to the group assignments. The anesthesiologist who administered the block was aware of the group allocation but did not participate in the postoperative assessments.
|
| Wound infiltration | Procedure | Wound infiltration was performed by the surgeon at the end of the surgery via the following procedure:
|
|
| Noted in hours in the first 48 hours postoperatively |
| Incidence of Side Effects | Including nausea, vomiting, pruritus, and urinary retention, | Recorded as binary outcomes (present/absent) in the first 48 hours postoperatively |
| Patient Satisfaction with Pain Management | Patient satisfaction was assessed via a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very dissatisfied, 5 = very satisfied) | At 48 hours postoperatively |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013130 | Spinal Stenosis |
| D010149 | Pain, Postoperative |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013122 | Spinal Diseases |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D011183 | Postoperative Complications |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided