Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical study is to compare the Tecnis Symfony Optiblue intraocular lens implant to the Tecnis Symfony intraocular lens implant in patients over 22 years old with cataracts in both eyes. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Which lens has less nighttime side effects? Which lens has higher patient satisfaction?
Participants will undergo a minimum of 7 study visits where they will complete a variety of vision tests and vision questionnaires.
This is 6 month, prospective, single center, subject/evaluator masked, bilateral, randomized clinical investigation of the TECNIS Symfony Model ZXR00V/ ZXW150 IOLs versus the TECNIS Symfony Model ZXR00/ZXT150 control IOL.
The study will enroll approximately 60 subjects to achieve approximately 54 randomized and bilaterally implanted subjects, resulting in approximately 25 evaluable subjects in each lens group at 6 months. Subjects are to be implanted with the same IOL in both eyes, the ZXR00V/ZXW150 or the ZXR00/ ZXT150 control IOL. The eye implanted first will be considered the primary study eye.
Surgeons will perform routine, small-incision cataract surgery and implant the study lenses using an implantation system qualified by the respective manufacturer for use with that IOL. The target for refractive outcomes will be emmetropia for both eyes.
All subjects will undergo a minimum of 7 study visits: Preoperative for both eyes; Operative for each eye; 1 week first eye and second eye, 1 month and 6 month visits for both eyes together.
The primary endpoint is patient reported nighttime dysphotopsia symptoms as measured by the PRVSQ v2 questionnaire.
The secondary endpoints are 25% low contrast visual acuity with glare and patient satisfaction.
OTHER ENDPOINTS
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tecnis Symfony Optiblue | Experimental | Tecnis Symfony Optiblue/Tecnis Symfony Optiblue Toric (ZXR00V/ZXW150) |
|
| Tecnis Symfony | Active Comparator | Tecnis Symfony/Tecnis Symfony Toric (ZXR00/ZXT150) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tecnis Symfony Optiblue/Tecnis Symfony Optiblue Toric (Models ZXR00V/ZXW150) | Device | Multifocal IOL with violet light filtration and high-resolution lathing |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient reported nighttime dysphotopsia symptoms | Patient-Reported Visual Symptoms Questionnaire (PRVSQ) | Pre-op visit, 1 month post-op visit, 6 month post-op visit |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Low contrast visual acuity with glare | Mesopic 25% low contrast visual acuity with glare | 1 month post-op visit, 6 month post-op visit |
| Patient overall satisfaction | Patient Recommendation Questionnaire |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Monocular photopic UCDVA | Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA) - photopic, monocular (Snellen visual acuity) | Pre-op visit |
| Monocular photopic UCDVA | Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA) - photopic, monocular (The Early Treatment Diabetes Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity) ETDRS letters range from 58.18 mm to 2.92 mm in height, corresponding to Snellen visual acuity fractions of 20/200 to 20/10, respectively. The larger the number, the worse the visual acuity. |
Inclusion Criteria:
All criteria apply to each study eye
Exclusion Criteria:
All criteria apply to each study eye:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Daniel H Chang, MD | Empire Eye and Laser Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Empire Eye and Laser Center | Bakersfield | California | 93309 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34269326 | Background | Chang DH, Janakiraman DP, Smith PJ, Buteyn A, Domingo J, Jones JJ, Christie WC. Visual outcomes and safety of an extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens: results of a pivotal clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Mar 1;48(3):288-297. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000747. | |
| 31824137 | Background | Hammond BR, Sreenivasan V, Suryakumar R. The Effects of Blue Light-Filtering Intraocular Lenses on the Protection and Function of the Visual System. Clin Ophthalmol. 2019 Dec 5;13:2427-2438. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S213280. eCollection 2019. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Eligible subjects were randomly assigned 1:1 to bilateral implantation with either Tecnis Symfony Optiblue/Tecnis Symfony Optiblue Toric (ZXR00V/ZXW150) or Tecnis Symfony/Tecnis Symfony Toric (ZXR00/ZXT150).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Tecnis Symfony/Tecnis Symfony Toric (Models ZXR00/ZXT150) | Device | Multifocal IOL with ultraviolet filtration |
|
| 1 month post-op visit, 6 month post-op visit |
| 1 week post-op visit first and second eye, 1 month post-op visit, 6 month post-op visit |
| Binocular UCDVA | Uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA) - photopic, binocular (The Early Treatment Diabetes Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity) ETDRS letters range from 58.18 mm to 2.92 mm in height, corresponding to Snellen visual acuity fractions of 20/200 to 20/10, respectively. The larger the number, the worse the visual acuity. | 1 month post-op visit, 6 month post-op visit |
| UCNVA at 40 cm | Uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA) - photopic, binocular at 40 cm (The Early Treatment Diabetes Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity) ETDRS letters range from 58.18 mm to 2.92 mm in height, corresponding to Snellen visual acuity fractions of 20/200 to 20/10, respectively. The larger the number, the worse the visual acuity. | 1 month post-op visit, 6 month post-op visit |
| Low contrast acuity without glare | 10% and 25% low contrast acuity without glare (photopic and mesopic) | 1 month post-op visit, 6 month post-op visit |
| Residual refractive error | Best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA) - photopic, monocular | 1 week post-op visit first and second eye, 1 month post-op visit, 6 month post-op visit |
| Natural binocular reading distance | Natural binocular reading distance (cm) | 1 month post-op visit, 6 month post-op visit |
| Distance of subjective near blur | Distance of subjective near blur (cm) | 1 month post-op visit, 6 month post-op visit |
| Lens findings/complications | Biomicroscopic slit-lamp exam including determination of medical and lens findings/complications | 1 day post-op visit first and second eye, 1 week post-op visit first and second eye, 1 month post-op visit, 6 month post-op visit |
| Spectacle use | Patient-Reported Spectacle Independence Questionnaire (PRSIQ) | 1 month post-op visit, 6 month post-op visit |
| Other ocular/visual symptoms (non-directed chief complaint) | A comprehensive list of all other self-reported ocular/visual complaints, in the patient's own words, will be compiled | 1 week post-op visit first and second eye, 1 month post-op visit, 6 month post-op visit |
| Patient satisfaction and recommendation | Patient Recommendation Questionnaire | 1 month post-op visit, 6 month post-op visit |
| Time with physician in exam room | Time with physician in exam room (minutes) | 1 day post-op visit first and second eye, 1 week post-op visit first and second eye, 1 month post-op visit, 6 month post-op visit |
| Background | Chang DH, Pastuck T, Rosen R, Hollmann S, Babic T, Stapars A. Violet and Blue Light: Impact of High-Energy Light on Vision and Health. (2020) Violet and Blue Light: Impact of High-Energy Light on Vision and Health. J Ophthalmic Stud 3(2):1-8. dx.doi.org/10.16966/2639-152X.119 |
| 37071325 | Background | Chang DH, Thompson VM, Christie WC, Chu YR, Vida RS. Clinical Evaluation of a Modified Light Transmission Short-Wavelength Filtering Intraocular Lens Compared to a Colorless Control. Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Jun;12(3):1775-1785. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00709-w. Epub 2023 Apr 18. |
| 34194292 | Background | Zhang L, Lin D, Wang Y, Chen W, Xiao W, Xiang Y, Zhu Y, Chen C, Dong X, Liu Y, Chen W, Lin H. Comparison of Visual Neuroadaptations After Multifocal and Monofocal Intraocular Lens Implantation. Front Neurosci. 2021 Jun 14;15:648863. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.648863. eCollection 2021. |
| 36891506 | Background | van der Mooren M, Alarcon A, Jenkins Sanchez MD, Chang DH. Effect of Violet Light-Filtering and Manufacturing Improvements in an Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens on Visual Performance. Clin Ophthalmol. 2023 Mar 1;17:701-709. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S396823. eCollection 2023. |
| 34522079 | Background | Chang DH, Waring GO, Hom M, Barnett M. Presbyopia Treatments by Mechanism of Action: A New Classification System Based on a Review of the Literature. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep 6;15:3733-3745. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S318065. eCollection 2021. |
| 37097283 | Background | Chang DH, Hu JG, Lehmann RP, Thompson VM, Tsai LH, Thomas EK. Clinical performance of a hybrid presbyopia-correcting intraocular lens in patients undergoing cataract surgery in a multicenter trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023 Aug 1;49(8):840-847. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001205. |
| 27943250 | Background | de Silva SR, Evans JR, Kirthi V, Ziaei M, Leyland M. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 12;12(12):CD003169. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003169.pub4. |
| 38068421 | Background | Han KE, Lee JE. Comparative Evaluation of Visual Performance and Patient Satisfaction following Cataract Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis of an Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens and a Diffractive Multifocal Lens with Extended Depth of Focus. J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 28;12(23):7368. doi: 10.3390/jcm12237368. |
| 19465282 | Background | Woodward MA, Randleman JB, Stulting RD. Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Jun;35(6):992-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.01.031. |
| 35862830 | Background | Ntonti P, Bakirtzis M, Delibasis K, Seimenis I, Tsinopoulos I, Labiris G. Impact of personality on the decision process and on satisfaction rates in pseudophakic presbyopic correction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2022 Dec 1;48(12):1433-1439. doi: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001021. |
| 37405796 | Background | Kim EC, Cho SY, Kang JE, Nam G, Yoon YC, Whang WJ, Na KS, Kim HS, Hwang HS. Comparative Analysis of Optical Quality of Monofocal, Enhanced Monofocal, Multifocal, and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Mobile Model Eye Study. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2023 Jul 3;12(7):5. doi: 10.1167/tvst.12.7.5. |
| 23811606 | Background | Meikies D, van der Mooren M, Terwee T, Guthoff RF, Stachs O. Rostock Glare Perimeter: a distinctive method for quantification of glare. Optom Vis Sci. 2013 Oct;90(10):1143-8. doi: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318295a720. |
| 37055289 | Background | Hays RD, MacRae S, Holladay J, Tarver ME, Lum F, Stark W, Weidmer B, Kumar N, Lau G, Nguyen T, Schallhorn S, Eydelman M, Masket S. Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome Measure to Assess Symptoms Associated with Cataract Surgery and Intraocular Lens Implants. Ophthalmology. 2023 Jul;130(7):715-725. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.02.026. Epub 2023 Apr 12. |
| 37061911 | Background | Masket S, Lum F, MacRae S, Hays RD, Tarver ME, Holladay J, Yoon G, Nguyen T, Stark W, Kumar N, Lau G, Schallhorn S, Eydelman M. Symptoms and Satisfaction Levels Associated with Intraocular Lens Implants in the Monofocal and Premium IOL Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Study. Ophthalmology. 2023 Jul;130(7):726-734. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.02.027. Epub 2023 Apr 15. |
| 15564759 | Background | Aslam TM, Dhillon B, Tallentire VR, Patton N, Aspinal P. Development of a forced choice photographic questionnaire for photic phenomena and its testing - repeatability, reliability and validity. Ophthalmologica. 2004 Nov-Dec;218(6):402-10. doi: 10.1159/000080944. |
| 39455493 | Derived | Chang DH, Kao AA, Huggins LK, Albert JN, Whinery JN, Camirand BM. Clinical Evaluation of Violet Light Filtration and High-Resolution Lathing on a Diffractive Extended Depth of Focus IOL. Ophthalmol Ther. 2024 Dec;13(12):3135-3147. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-01056-0. Epub 2024 Oct 25. |
Not provided
| Release Date | Unrelease Date | Unrelease Date Unknown | Reset Date | MCP Release Number |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2025 | Mar 27, 2025 | 1 | ||
| Apr 21, 2025 | May 6, 2025 | 2 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002386 | Cataract |
| D011305 | Presbyopia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007905 | Lens Diseases |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
| D012030 | Refractive Errors |
Not provided
Not provided