Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1R21HD109744-01A1 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study proposes to pilot an online intervention to support father-teen health-promoting talk about sex and relationships using Social Cognitive Theory, and to evaluate this intervention's acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy, using an Intervention Mapping approach. This study involves conducting a pilot intervention with 50 pairs of fathers and their high-school aged teens. Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed through program data such as participants' pilot enrollment, lesson feedback, and program retention, survey data and member checks through debrief interviews (5 father, 5 teens). Preliminary assessment of directionality of change in participants' health-related knowledge, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations over the course of the pilot intervention (pre- and post-intervention surveys) to determine whether a full-scale R01 is warranted.
This study proposes to pilot an online intervention to support father-teen health-promoting talk about sex and relationships using Social Cognitive Theory, and to evaluate this intervention's acceptability, feasibility, and preliminary efficacy, using an Intervention Mapping approach. This study involves conducting a pilot intervention with 50 pairs of fathers and their high-school aged teens. Feasibility and acceptability will be assessed through program data such as participants' pilot enrollment, lesson feedback, and program retention, survey data from Acceptability of Intervention Measure and Feasibility of Intervention Measure, and member checks through debrief interviews (5 father, 5 teens). Preliminary assessment of directionality of change in participants' health-related knowledge, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations over the course of the pilot intervention (pre- and post-intervention surveys) to determine whether a full-scale R01 is warranted.
The investigators will recruit a diverse sample of father-adolescent pairs (N=50 pairs) through partnership with three community partner organizations. Fathers will be asked questions online to determine project eligibility and demographics (screener) and given an online consent form. If a father agrees to teens' participation, the teen will be sent an assent form for their own participation and a brief screener survey. If teens are 18 or older, the investigators will request their contact information from participating fathers and ask teens to provide their own consent. Only father/teen pairs who complete the screeners and consent/assent forms, meet eligibility criteria, and both agree to participate can join the study.
All pilot participants will be given a pre-and post-intervention survey to assess any change in proximal outcomes. Participants will be asked to participate in 3 online modules over 6 weeks which include 3 online lessons (father and teens complete separately) and father/teen activities (fathers and teens complete together) and 3 father support group (father only). Each module will last one week and will include an online lesson and father-teen activity (fathers and teens) and online father support group session (fathers only). Lessons and support group sessions will include feedback questions (acceptability). Tracking of enrollment, retention, and duration of lesson participation will provide feasibility assessment. To obtain in-depth feedback on participants' responses to the intervention (acceptability), and to conduct member checks on pilot lesson feedback, the investigators will conduct debrief interviews with a purposive sample of pilot participants (5 fathers, 5 teens) with variation in: teen gender and level of intervention engagement.
The 3 module, 3-week intervention will be delivered on Qualtrics and Zoom, accessible via computer or tablet. Online lessons will be self-paced within each week and will each include a father-teen activity, with text and e-mail reminders at the start and end of the week. Father support groups will occur online at a scheduled time planned based on fathers' schedules. Given the limited scope of the project, prototype technology will be relatively simple, with more advanced technology planned for a future R01.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pilot group for program | Experimental | To assess program feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy, we will pilot the intervention with a purposive sample of 50 father-teen pairs (100 participants total). All participants will receive the program. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pilot program study | Behavioral | To assess program feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy, we will pilot the intervention with a purposive sample of 50 father-teen pairs (100 participants total). All participants will receive the program. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Sexual knowledge | Participants' knowledge about contraception, condom use, and sexually transmitted infections for fathers and teens (3 sub-scales, self-report, true/false with higher score indicating greater knowledge). | immediately before and immediately after the intervention |
| Sexual Communication Self-Efficacy Scale | Teen participants' confidence in their capacity to talk with a partner about sexual issues including using protection during sex (5 subscales, self-report, 4-point Likert scales with 1-4 score range with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy). | immediately before and immediately after the intervention |
| Self-Efficacy in Relationships | Teen participants' confidence in their capacity to talk with a partner what they want and do not want in a relationship such as breaking up with someone they no longer like (self-report, 4-point Likert scales with 1-4 score range with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy). | immediately before and immediately after the intervention |
| Self-Efficacy for Consent | Teen participants' confidence in their capacity to talk with a partner about consent, including asking for consent for sex (self-report, 4-point Likert scales with 1-4 score range with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy). | immediately before and immediately after the intervention |
| Self-Efficacy for Communication with Teens about Sex | Father participants' confidence in their capacity to talk with their teen about sexual issues and relationships (self-report, 4-point Likert scales with 1-4 score range with higher scores indicating higher self-efficacy). | immediately before and immediately after the intervention |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion criteria for fathers:
Exclusion criteria for fathers:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jennifer Grossman, Ph.D. | Contact | 781-283-2521 | jgrossma@wellesley.edu | |
| Michelle Sullivan, Ph.D. | Contact | 781-283-3277 | ms154@wellesley.edu |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wellesley College | Recruiting | Wellesley | Massachusetts | 02481 | United States |
Documentation to be made publicly available to the research community will include pilot surveys and interview protocols, along with a detailed User Guide for interviews. A survey codebook will include a description of all items and survey measures as well as variable names, variable labels, and standard codes for missing values. Interview data will include a description of recoded data categories. We expect study data and associated documentation will be made available to the research community free of charge through the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR).
Final submission and release of the study data will occur approximately 1 year following the end of fieldwork. Study data deposited in the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research will be available to the research community in perpetuity. Datasets underlying methodological publications will be shared at or prior to initial publication date as appropriate.
Deidentified pilot survey data will be made available as public use data to the research community via the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR). Users of this data must register with ICPSR and agree to the Terms of Use. Data users also agree not to share or redistribute any data downloads.
Recoded interview data that is determined to be potentially identifying through indirect or deductive disclosure are provided under restricted data contract to users who demonstrate a valid research need and meet conditions of use.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003142 | Communication |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001519 | Behavior |
Not provided
Not provided
To assess program feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy, the investigators will pilot the intervention with a purposive sample of 50 father-teen pairs. All participants will receive the intervention. An online screener, pre- and post-intervention surveys, and brief module feedback will assess feasibility and acceptability. Pre- and post-intervention surveys will provide initial data on directionality for correlates of teens' sexual risk behaviors to determine whether a full-scale R01 is warranted. Debrief interviews with a purposive sample of pilot participants (5 fathers, 5 teens) will obtain in-depth intervention feedback and conduct member checks on module feedback. The investigators will revise the intervention prototype based on feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy data, then write up and distribute findings for dissemination.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Comfort Talking with Family about Sex | Participants' comfort to talk with their father/teen about sexual issues and relationships for fathers and teens including being able to talk openly and honestly about sex (self-report, 4-point Likert scales with 1-4 score range with higher scores indicating higher comfort). | immediately before and immediately after the intervention |
| Open Communication Scale | Participants' comfort to talk with their father/teen about sex and relationships for fathers and teens including comfort talking through questions about sex (self-report, 4-point Likert scales with 1-4 score range with higher scores indicating higher comfort). | immediately before and immediately after the intervention |
| Communication about Sex and Protection | Participants' reported frequency of talk with their father/teen about sex and relationships including talking with your father/teen about how to use condoms (self-report, 4-point Likert scales with 1-4 score range with higher scores indicating more frequent communication). | immediately before and immediately after the intervention |
| Communication with family about sex & relationships | Participants' reported frequency of talk with their father/teen about sex and relationships including talk about value about sex and relationships (self-report, 4-point Likert scales with 1-4 score range with higher scores indicating more frequent communication). | immediately before and immediately after the intervention |
| Frequency of Talk with Family about Sex and Relationships | Participants' reported frequency of talk with their father/teen about sex and relationships including when it is ok to have sex (self-report, 4-point Likert scales with 1-4 score range with higher scores indicating more frequent communication). | immediately before and immediately after the intervention |
| Feasibility of Intervention Measure | Participants' experience of the program's accessibility including whether the program seems doable for fathers and teens (self-report, 5-point Likert scales with 1-5 score range with higher scores indicating higher feasibility). | immediately after the intervention |
| Feasibility: Participants' experience of the program's ease | Participants' experience of the program's ease of use including whether the program was well-organized for fathers and teens (self-report, 5-point Likert scales with 1-5 score range with higher scores indicating higher feasibility). | immediately after the intervention |
| Acceptability of Intervention Measure: whether participants approve of the program | Participants' experience of the program including whether they approve of the program for fathers and teens (self-report, 5-point Likert scales with 1-5 score range with higher scores indicating higher acceptability). | immediately after the intervention |
| Intervention Acceptability and Tolerability: Participants' experience of the program's importance | Participants' experience of the program's importance including whether they think the program was helpful for fathers and teens (self-report, 5-point Likert scales with 1-5 score range with higher scores indicating higher acceptability). | immediately after the intervention |