Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
In our high volume center, the majority of esophagectomy procedures are performed with minimally invasive techniques. The thoracic epidural technique remains the gold standard and homolateral paravertebral catheter is strongly recommended. The vasoplegia and sympathetic blockade due to the epidural can cause significant hypotension especially as reverse Trendelenburg position is required during surgery. The aim is to study hemodynamic changes caused by two different techniques. Previous studies found a similar pain management between both locoregional techniques, however few studies suggested less side effects in the paravertebral group during major abdominal surgeries.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epidural group | Active Comparator |
| |
| Paravertebral group | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hemodynamic changes between epidural and paravertebral during esophagectomy | Other | The thoracic epidural technique remains the gold standard for perioperative pain management for this procedure. The placement of a paravertebral catheter homolateral with the thoracic incisions is strongly recommended. A goal directed fluid therapy is proposed to guide fluid management and limit postoperative complications. Few studies suggested less side effects in the paravertebral group. The vasoplegia due to the epidural can cause significant hypotension especially as reverse Trendelenburg position is required during surgery. The aim is to bring more light to the hemodynamic changes caused by two different locoregional techniques. An algorithm for fluid and vasopressor management has been proposed. We defined hypotension as 20% of decrement of the median arterial pressure during anesthesia. To reduce bias, the locoregional techniques is performed by an experienced anesthesiologists and the rest of the perioperative management is conducted by another blinded anesthesiologist. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption of norepinephrine and fluids during procedure | norepinephrine mcg/kg/hr | 6 hours |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Postoperative complications | Medical complications: Pneumonia, atrial fibrillation, thromboembolic event Surgical complications : Wound dehiscence, anastomotic leakage, chylothorax, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury | 6 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Annalinda CIORRA, MD | Contact | +32(0)25553324 | annalinda.ciorra@hubruxelles.be | |
| Fanny BERNARD, MD | Contact | +32(0)25553324 | fanny.bernard@hubruxelles.be |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Laszlo SZEGEDI, PHD | Laszlo.szegedi@hubruxelles.be | Study Chair |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30276441 | Background | Low DE, Allum W, De Manzoni G, Ferri L, Immanuel A, Kuppusamy M, Law S, Lindblad M, Maynard N, Neal J, Pramesh CS, Scott M, Mark Smithers B, Addor V, Ljungqvist O. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Esophagectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS(R)) Society Recommendations. World J Surg. 2019 Feb;43(2):299-330. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4786-4. | |
| 34795950 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Deana C, Vetrugno L, Bignami E, Bassi F. Peri-operative approach to esophagectomy: a narrative review from the anesthesiological standpoint. J Thorac Dis. 2021 Oct;13(10):6037-6051. doi: 10.21037/jtd-21-940. |
| 32087686 | Background | Kingma BF, Eshuis WJ, de Groot EM, Feenstra ML, Ruurda JP, Gisbertz SS, Ten Hoope W, Marsman M, Hermanides J, Hollmann MW, Kalkman CJ, Luyer MDP, Nieuwenhuijzen GAP, Scholten HJ, Buise M, van Det MJ, Kouwenhoven EA, van der Meer F, Frederix GWJ, Cheong E, Al Naimi K, van Berge Henegouwen MI, van Hillegersberg R. Paravertebral catheter versus EPidural analgesia in Minimally invasive Esophageal resectioN: a randomized controlled multicenter trial (PEPMEN trial). BMC Cancer. 2020 Feb 22;20(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6585-1. |
| 31080659 | Background | van den Berg JW, Tabrett K, Cheong E. Paravertebral catheter analgesia for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy. J Thorac Dis. 2019 Apr;11(Suppl 5):S786-S793. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.03.47. |
| 26897642 | Background | Yeung JH, Gates S, Naidu BV, Wilson MJ, Gao Smith F. Paravertebral block versus thoracic epidural for patients undergoing thoracotomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 21;2(2):CD009121. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009121.pub2. |