Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Alabama at Birmingham | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Black Americans and those of lower socioeconomic position (SEP) are at higher risk for multiple diseases of aging and shorter lifespans, but the psychophysiological mechanisms that may account for these effects are not clear. The overarching objective of this pilot grant is to improve our understanding of the proximal social exposures and subsequent psychobiological processes that contribute to racial and socioeconomic health disparities. Precisely understanding what these mutable social and psychological mechanisms are is necessary in order to identify intervention targets at the level of the individual.
Black Americans and those of lower socioeconomic position (SEP) are at higher risk for multiple diseases of aging and shorter lifespans. Though these disparities are well-documented, the mechanisms that may account for them are still poorly understood. Low income or Black race do not, themselves, cause individuals to become sick. Instead, the social context and exposures associated with these personal attributes give rise to differential risk (1-3). Black race and lower SEP are overlapping in the United States and race and SEP may share common social exposures that contribute to disease risk because both Blacks and individuals of lower SEP are socially marginalized (e.g., devalued, pushed to the lower margins of society) and thus exposed to more stress associated with lower hierarchical rank (4). However, no studies to our knowledge have been designed to examine whether day-to-day social exposures common across race and SEP may contribute to higher overall disease burden in these groups. In this project, investigators examine whether daily social interaction patterns help to explain how race and SEP may be linked with well-established psychobiological pathways to disease (affect, behavior, and physiology). With respect to each of these pathways, investigators examine the extent to which within-person changes in social processes may be associated with effects that mirror (and thus could explain) between-group differences. For example, interactions in which one experiences a higher degree of disrespect may be associated with momentary changes in affect, behavior, and physiology that confer disease risk. Examination of these within-person processes allows for stronger causal inference and is directly relevant to the development of individual-level interventions (e.g., targeting cognitive, behavioral, and affective processes). These findings can directly inform individual and group interventions for stress reduction in health disparity populations.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Community sample | Black Americans (8 high SEP, 8 low SEP) and White Americans (8 high SEP, 8 low SEP) between the ages of 35 and 70 |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| There is no intervention | Other | There is no intervention. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure | Mean | during four days of ambulatory monitoring |
| Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure | Mean | during four days of ambulatory monitoring |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
- Black American or White American between the ages of 35 and 70.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Recruitment will target Black Americans (8 high SEP, 8 low SEP) and White Americans (8 high SEP, 8 low SEP) between the ages of 35 and 70. Low SEP will be defined as a score of 1 to 3 on the MacArthur (ladder) scale of subjective social status (range 1-10), and high SEP as a score of 8-10 on the same scale.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jenny Cundiff | University of Alabama at Birmingham | Principal Investigator |
| Karlene Ball | University of Alabama at Birmingham | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of AL Psychology Department | Tuscaloosa | Alabama | 35404 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10936998 | Background | Jones CP. Levels of racism: a theoretic framework and a gardener's tale. Am J Public Health. 2000 Aug;90(8):1212-5. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.8.1212. | |
| 28402827 | Background | Bailey ZD, Krieger N, Agenor M, Graves J, Linos N, Bassett MT. Structural racism and health inequities in the USA: evidence and interventions. Lancet. 2017 Apr 8;389(10077):1453-1463. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30569-X. |
Not provided
Not provided
Data will also be presented at international scientific meetings regularly attended by the PI (e.g., American Psychosomatic Society, Society for Behavioral Medicine) and shared at both national and regional RCMAR conferences. Preliminary findings from this proposed study will be used to apply for NIH R-series funding to conduct a larger study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 15671470 | Background | Krieger N, Chen JT, Waterman PD, Rehkopf DH, Subramanian SV. Painting a truer picture of US socioeconomic and racial/ethnic health inequalities: the Public Health Disparities Geocoding Project. Am J Public Health. 2005 Feb;95(2):312-23. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2003.032482. |
| 24347666 | Background | Williams DR, Mohammed SA. Racism and Health I: Pathways and Scientific Evidence. Am Behav Sci. 2013 Aug 1;57(8):10.1177/0002764213487340. doi: 10.1177/0002764213487340. |