Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A single-arm, multicenter interventional clinical study will be conducted. The objective is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the cryolipolysis technique. Approximately 372 participants will be included. After analyzing the items listed above, the participants in each study will be divided into 3 distinct intervention groups. The individuals included in the study will undergo anamnesis and data collection.
The participants in each study will be divided into 3 distinct intervention groups (Grupo 1: aplicador 360° M - Região abdominal; Grupo 2: aplicador 360° G - Região abdominal; Grupo 3: aplicador de placas - Região dos flancos). After analyzing the inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study, the individuals included in the study will undergo anamnesis and data collection after the procedure and 6 weeks and 20 weeks after: photographic capture, bioimpedance, perimetry, adipometry and ultrasound imaging of the treated area, in addition to a pain and patient satisfaction questionnaire.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 - 360° M applicator, abdominal | Experimental | Group 1: 360° M applicator - Abdominal region |
|
| Group 2 - 360° G applicator, abdominal | Experimental | Group 2: 360° G applicator - Abdominal region |
|
| Group 3 - flanks | Experimental | Group 3: Plate applicator - Flank region |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polarys Cryolipolysis | Device | The procedure will take place in a session lasting a maximum of 60 minutes, which may vary depending on the amount of fat in the area and the type of applicator chosen (with or without vacuum). The patient will be comfortably positioned, in a position that facilitates suction/fixation of the applicator. An antifreeze membrane will be applied correctly to the skin, avoiding wrinkles. The marked skin area will be positioned in the center of the membrane. The applicator will be positioned in the treatment area at 90° to the skin and will activate the START. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Ocurrence of adverse events after de procedure assessed by clinical evaluation | Adverse events such as erythema, pain, edema or any other event that occurs in correlation with the treatment, through monitoring in the reassessments stipulated in the study and also in a questionnaire answered by the patient | After de procedure and 6 and 20 weeks after |
| % reduction in fat layer assessed by ultrasound, adipometer and photography | Adipometer: to measure the thickest point within the treatment area. For the evaluation in the abdominal region, reference points located 5 cm to the side of the umbilical scar, both on the right and left sides, will be recorded. For the evaluation in the flank region, the measurement will be standardized using the axillary midline, being performed exactly in the central fold of each flank; Ultrasound: subcutaneous tissue between the anatomical planes. The probe will be positioned at the points previously marked in the treatment area, following the same measurement performed for adipometry; Photography: at fixed angles and postures with standardized disposable underwear. Three-dimensional images will be taken of the subjects in sagittal (left and right sides) and coronal (front and back sides) views at baseline and at the stipulated follow-up periods. The abdominal region will be exposed and the subject will be instructed to remain still while the camera captures an image. | Immediately after the procedure and 6 and 20 weeks after |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Patient"s satisfaction assessed by GAIS scale | Patient satisfaction level will be categorized using the 5-point Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). It is divided into 5: "excellent", 4: "greatly improved", 3: "improved", 2: "no change" and 1: "worsened". | 6 weeks and 20 weeks after the cryolipolysis procedure |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UNDB | São Luís | Maranhão | 65075-441 | Brazil | ||
| Clinica Franciele Doneda Estetica Integrada |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30980602 | Background | Faulhaber J, Sandhofer M, Weiss C, Sattler G, Sadick NS. Effective noninvasive body contouring by using a combination of cryolipolysis, injection lipolysis, and shock waves. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2019 Aug;18(4):1014-1019. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12953. Epub 2019 Apr 13. | |
| 31375459 | Background | Falster M, Schardong J, Santos DPD, Machado BC, Peres A, Rosa PVD, Plentz RDM. Effects of cryolipolysis on lower abdomen fat thickness of healthy women and patient satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial. Braz J Phys Ther. 2020 Sep-Oct;24(5):441-448. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2019.07.005. Epub 2019 Jul 26. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015431 | Weight Loss |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001836 | Body Weight Changes |
| D001835 | Body Weight |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Paranavaí |
| Paraná |
| 87709-180 |
| Brazil |
| UNIFAE | São Paulo | São Paulo | 13870-377 | Brazil |
| 23639062 | Background | Dierickx CC, Mazer JM, Sand M, Koenig S, Arigon V. Safety, tolerance, and patient satisfaction with noninvasive cryolipolysis. Dermatol Surg. 2013 Aug;39(8):1209-16. doi: 10.1111/dsu.12238. Epub 2013 May 2. |
| 19296153 | Background | Coleman SR, Sachdeva K, Egbert BM, Preciado J, Allison J. Clinical efficacy of noninvasive cryolipolysis and its effects on peripheral nerves. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009 Jul;33(4):482-8. doi: 10.1007/s00266-008-9286-8. Epub 2009 Mar 19. |
| 25111437 | Background | Boey GE, Wasilenchuk JL. Fat reduction in the inner thigh using a prototype cryolipolysis applicator. Dermatol Surg. 2014 Sep;40(9):1004-9. doi: 10.1097/01.DSS.0000452628.99209.4f. |
| 25395266 | Background | Bernstein EF, Bloom JD, Basilavecchio LD, Plugis JM. Non-invasive fat reduction of the flanks using a new cryolipolysis applicator and overlapping, two-cycle treatments. Lasers Surg Med. 2014 Dec;46(10):731-5. doi: 10.1002/lsm.22302. Epub 2014 Nov 13. |
| 28426847 | Background | Bernstein EF, Bloom JD. Safety and Efficacy of Bilateral Submental Cryolipolysis With Quantified 3-Dimensional Imaging of Fat Reduction and Skin Tightening. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Sep 1;19(5):350-357. doi: 10.1001/jamafacial.2017.0102. |
| 32293044 | Background | Abdel-Aal NM, Elerian AE, Elmakaky AM, Alhamaky DMA. Systemic Effects of Cryolipolysis in Central Obese Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Lasers Surg Med. 2020 Dec;52(10):971-978. doi: 10.1002/lsm.23250. Epub 2020 Apr 15. |