Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Research is to compare and evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the enamel matrix derivative with or without connective tissue wall graft for noncontained infrabony defects using simplified papilla preservation technique .
Research is to compare and evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the enamel matrix derivative with or without connective tissue wall graft for noncontained infrabony defects using simplified papilla preservation technique .The objectives is to assess the probing pocket depth reduction, clinical attachment level gain,gingival recession depth and radiographic bone gain. The TEST group will be treated withSIMPLIFIED PAPILLA PRESERVATION flap with connective tissue graft and enamel matrix derivative and the CONTROL group will be treated with SIMPLIFIED APILLA PRESERVATION flap and enamel matrix derivative. The total number of participants included will be 30 (Control-15; Study-15) with a 6 month follow up.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| control group | Active Comparator | Simplified papilla preservation flap with enamel matrix derivative will be performed |
|
| Test group | Experimental | Simplified papilla preservation flap with connective tissue graft and enamel matrix derivative will be performed |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enamel matrix derivative | Procedure | connective tissue graft and Enamel matrix derivative in the defect area |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| clinical attachment gain | change in attachment level for patient with isolated 2 or 3 wall defect treated with enamel matrix derivative and connective tissue wall graft in 1,3 and 6 months follow up | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| pocket probing depth | change in pocket probing depth from baseline to 1,3 and 6 months | 6 months |
| radiographic bone gain | change in radiographic bone level from baseline to 1,3,6 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prabhuji MLV, MDS | Contact | 9448057407 | prabhujimlv@gmail.com | |
| Head of the department and professor | Contact |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 6 months |
| recession reduction | change in recession from baseline to 1,3 and 6 months | 6 months |
| plaque index | change in plaque index from baseline to 1,3 and 6 months | 6 months |
| gingival index | change in calculus index from baseline to 1,3 and 6 months | 6 months |