A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Etoposide, Cytarabine, and PEG-rhG-CSF Combination Therapy vs. Disease-Specific Chemotherapy for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization in Lymphoma
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Etoposide, Cytarabine, and PEG-rhG-CSF Combination Therapy vs. Disease-Specific Chemotherapy for Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization in Lymphoma
This study utilizes a prospective, multicenter, randomized two-arm design to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the etoposide, cytarabine, and pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF) combination therapy (EAP regimen) in mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). A total of 99 NHL patients will be enrolled as research subjects and will be randomly allocated in a 2:1 ratio to compare the EAP regimen versus disease-specific chemotherapy mobilization regimen. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving the ideal collection value after a single collection (CD34+ cells ≥5×10^6/kg).
Based on strict inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 99 non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients from 16 hospitals will be selected. Eligible subjects will be randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to either the experimental group or the control group. The experimental group will receive the EAP regimen, which combines etoposide, cytarabine, and pegylated recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PEG-rhG-CSF), while the control group will receive disease-specific chemotherapy mobilization regimens, such as the CHOP and Hyper-CVAD. Subsequently, the number of CD34+ cells will be monitored. The study will evaluate the proportion of patients achieving the ideal collection value after a single collection (CD34+ cells ≥5×106/kg); the proportion of patients achieving the target collection value cumulatively; the total amount of CD34+ cells collected and the average number of collections; hematological and non-hematological adverse reactions; and the proportion of patients receiving plerixafor.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
39612903@qq.com86-13685832706
814871416@qq.com86-13486090834
Dongyang, Zhejiang, China
Wugongqiang59@126.com13757950788
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
tongxiangmin@163.com+86-13750816623
jiej0503@163.com13507016779
Jianghuifang501@163.com13957182087
SLH077@126.COM13587206019
zhwuhan@163.com13957330440
zjc1983@126.com13958480529
huanglixiaoyu@126.com13566782316
Lilinjie0394@163.com13567615761
nblejing@aliyun.com13566511755
39612903@qq.com13685832706
814871416@qq.com13486090834
fengweiying1997@126.com13588570250
yin990216@sina.com18767509030
chens7111@tzzxyy.com13575809591
guoqunyi@163.com13515861286
wzly1974@hotmail.com13705883857
Zhousj320@163.com13738368586