Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Phase III longitudinal, multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Fixed-Dose Combination of Etoricoxib/Cyanocobalamin Versus Etoricoxib in Patients With Acute Low Back Pain
Researchers will compare the fixed-dose combination of Etoricoxib/Cyanocobalamin versus Etoricoxib in acute low back pain by comparing the proportion of patients that reported an improvement in pain during the 7 days of follow up. The adverse events related to the interventions will be registered during follow up.
Participants will:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etoricoxib+Cyanocobalamin | Experimental | Administered orally, 1 tablet a day for 7 days. |
|
| Etoricoxib | Active Comparator | Administered orally, 1 pill a day for 7 days. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Etoricoxib + Cyanocobalamin fixed dose | Drug | One tablet of 90 mg / 0.50 mg a day |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Comparison of the proportion of patients reporting pain improvement (reduction in pain intensity with a VAS ≤20 mm) at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days of follow-up, according to their baseline measurement in each treatment group | The visual analog pain scale (VAS) is a straight line in which one end signifies absence of pain and the other means the worst pain imaginable. The researcher will apply the VAS scale to each patient at each visit to assess pain intensity. At the end of the clinical trial the change porcentage will be measured and compared between treatment groups. The patient will visit the clinic at days 0,3 and 7. The researcher will call the patient for follow up at days 1 and 5. | 7 dyas |
| Number of participants with treatment-related adverse events through the patient's diary record. | To describe the frequency, intensity and causality of the adverse events presented during the clinical trial by treatment group. The adverse events will be registered by the patient in the diary record. Each adverse event will be followed up at the discretion of the researcher. | 7 dyas |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Analyze the average change in pain intensity according to VAS score at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days in each treatment group and in comparison with the baseline measurement. | The visual analog pain scale (VAS) is a straight line in which one end signifies absence of pain and the other means the worst pain imaginable. The researcher will apply the VAS scale to each patient at each visit to assess pain intensity. At the end of the clinical trial the change porcentage will be measured and compared between treatment groups. The patient will visit the clinic at days 0,3 and 7. The researcher will call the patient for follow up at days 1 and 5. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To report the percentage of therapeutic adherence at day 7 of the intervention in each treatment group. | Therapeutic adherence will be defined by the principal researcher. Adherence to treatment will be defined as a consumption ≥ 80% of the doses that the patient should have ingested at the time of the corresponding evaluation. | 7 days |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Ricardo Choza-Romero, MD | Centro de Atención e Investigación Clínica S.C. | Principal Investigator |
| Adelfia Urenda-Quezada, MD | Servicios Avanzados de Investigación Médica Mediadvance S.C. | Principal Investigator |
| Isabel E Rucker Joerg, MD | Clinical Research Institute S.C. | Principal Investigator |
| Jesus H Mendoza-Ramírez, MD | Unidad Clínica de Bioequivalencia, S. de R.L. de C.V. | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laboratorio Silanes, S.A. de C.V. | Mexico City | Mexico City | 11000 | Mexico |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15827069 | Background | Martina SD, Vesta KS, Ripley TL. Etoricoxib: a highly selective COX-2 inhibitor. Ann Pharmacother. 2005 May;39(5):854-62. doi: 10.1345/aph.1E543. Epub 2005 Apr 12. | |
| 18840026 | Background | Takemoto JK, Reynolds JK, Remsberg CM, Vega-Villa KR, Davies NM. Clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of etoricoxib. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2008;47(11):703-20. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200847110-00002. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D059787 | Acute Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077613 | Etoricoxib |
| D014805 | Vitamin B 12 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013450 | Sulfones |
| D013457 | Sulfur Compounds |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D011725 | Pyridines |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Etoricoxib fixed dose | Drug | One pill of 90 mg a day |
|
|
| 7 days |
| Analyze the percentage change in pain intensity based on VAS score at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days in each treatment group and in comparison with the baseline measurement. | % change= ((Final Measurement-Initial Measurement)/(Initial Measurement))*100 | 7 days |
| Comparison of the proportion of subjects with pain improvement (reduction in pain intensity) through VAS, ≥ 30% at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days in each treatment group and in comparison with the baseline measurement. | The visual analog pain scale (VAS) is a straight line in which one end signifies absence of pain and the other means the worst pain imaginable. The researcher will apply the VAS scale to each patient at each visit to assess pain intensity. The proportion of patiens with an improvement of pain >30% will be reported and compared between treatment groups at days 1,3,5 and 7. | 7 days |
| Comparison of the proportion of subjects with pain improvement (reduction in pain intensity) through VAS, ≥ 50% at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days in each treatment group and in comparison with the baseline measurement. | The visual analog pain scale (VAS) is a straight line in which one end signifies absence of pain and the other means the worst pain imaginable. The researcher will apply the VAS scale to each patient at each visit to assess pain intensity. The proportion of patiens with an improvement of pain >30% will be reported and compared between treatment groups at days 1,3,5 and 7. | 7 days |
| Assess and compare the degree of physical disability due to acute low back pain, measured through the Oswestry disability questionnaire at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days in each treatment group and in comparison with the baseline measurement. | The Oswestry questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back pain has affected the ability to manage everyday life of patients, it classifies QOL as: no disability, mild disability, moderate disability, severe disability and completely disabled. The disability degree would be compared. | 7 days |
| Assess and compare the degree of disability to perform daily activities due to low back pain, reported through Roland-Morris questionnaire at 1, 3, 5, and 7 days in each treatment group and in comparison with the baseline measurement. | The Roland-Morris questionnaire has been designed to assess the activities of daily living functional mobility pain. A maximum score of 24 indicates the greatest degree of disability from pain. The disability degree will be compared. | 7 days |
| Assess changes in the score on the "Douleur Neuropathique-4 items" scale (DN-4) at days 3 and 7 in each treatment group and in comparison with the baseline measurement. | The DN4 is a clinician-administered, neuropathic pain diagnostic questionnaire, consisting of ten items grouped in four sections. The first seven items are related to the quality of pain (burning, painful cold, electric shocks) and its association to abnormal sensations (tingling, pins and needles, numbness, itching). The other three items are related to neurological examination in the painful area (touch hypoesthesia, pinprick hypoesthesia, tactile allodynia). | 7 days |
| Report the number of patients who present therapeutic failure during the study among the treatment groups | Therapeutic failure will be defined by the principal researcher previous medical consult, the following criteria must be present: - When there is a decrease <10 mm or increase in VAS values compared to baseline and a ≥ 80% adherence to treatment | 7 days |
| Report the number of patients who require the use of rescue medication during the clinical trial in each treatment group |
The rescue medication will be tramadol 50 mg: - The patient that considers the need for rescue medication must call the doctor, who will be in charge of applying the VAS scale by telephone. If the doctor considers it necessary, the taking of the rescue medication will be indicated. |
| 7 days |
| 22159928 | Background | Chiu CK, Low TH, Tey YS, Singh VA, Shong HK. The efficacy and safety of intramuscular injections of methylcobalamin in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomised controlled trial. Singapore Med J. 2011 Dec;52(12):868-73. |
| 15370723 | Background | Pallay RM, Seger W, Adler JL, Ettlinger RE, Quaidoo EA, Lipetz R, O'Brien K, Mucciola L, Skalky CS, Petruschke RA, Bohidar NR, Geba GP. Etoricoxib reduced pain and disability and improved quality of life in patients with chronic low back pain: a 3 month, randomized, controlled trial. Scand J Rheumatol. 2004;33(4):257-66. doi: 10.1080/03009740410005728. |
| 31368292 | Background | Letizia Mauro G, Lauricella L, Vecchio M, Tomasello S, Scaturro D. Efficacy and tolerability of a fixed dose combination of cortex phospholipid liposomes and cyanocobalamin for intramuscular use in peripheral neuropathies. Minerva Med. 2019 Oct;110(5):455-463. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4806.19.06068-3. |
| 18491996 | Background | Zhang YF, Ning G. Mecobalamin. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2008 Jun;17(6):953-64. doi: 10.1517/13543784.17.6.953. |
| 11722601 | Background | Peracchi M, Bamonti Catena F, Pomati M, De Franceschi M, Scalabrino G. Human cobalamin deficiency: alterations in serum tumour necrosis factor-alpha and epidermal growth factor. Eur J Haematol. 2001 Aug;67(2):123-7. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0609.2001.t01-1-00507.x. |
| 11558625 | Background | Mauro GL, Martorana U, Cataldo P, Brancato G, Letizia G. Vitamin B12 in low back pain: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2000 May-Jun;4(3):53-8. |
| 31529101 | Background | Calderon-Ospina CA, Nava-Mesa MO, Arbelaez Ariza CE. Effect of Combined Diclofenac and B Vitamins (Thiamine, Pyridoxine, and Cyanocobalamin) for Low Back Pain Management: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pain Med. 2020 Apr 1;21(4):766-781. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnz216. |
| 22934743 | Background | Bacchi S, Palumbo P, Sponta A, Coppolino MF. Clinical pharmacology of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: a review. Antiinflamm Antiallergy Agents Med Chem. 2012;11(1):52-64. doi: 10.2174/187152312803476255. |
| 17685888 | Background | Antoniou K, Malamas M, Drosos AA. Clinical pharmacology of celecoxib, a COX-2 selective inhibitor. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2007 Aug;8(11):1719-32. doi: 10.1517/14656566.8.11.1719. |
| 22588742 | Background | Smeets R, Koke A, Lin CW, Ferreira M, Demoulin C. Measures of function in low back pain/disorders: Low Back Pain Rating Scale (LBPRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation (PILE), Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBPDS), and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11:S158-73. doi: 10.1002/acr.20542. No abstract available. |
| 34760748 | Background | Shukla AK, Jhaj R, Misra S, Ahmed SN, Nanda M, Chaudhary D. Agreement between WHO-UMC causality scale and the Naranjo algorithm for causality assessment of adverse drug reactions. J Family Med Prim Care. 2021 Sep;10(9):3303-3308. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_831_21. Epub 2021 Sep 30. |
| 19731994 | Background | Mibielli MA, Geller M, Cohen JC, Goldberg SG, Cohen MT, Nunes CP, Oliveira LB, da Fonseca AS. Diclofenac plus B vitamins versus diclofenac monotherapy in lumbago: the DOLOR study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Nov;25(11):2589-99. doi: 10.3111/13696990903246911. |
| D006573 |
| Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D045728 | Corrinoids |
| D045725 | Tetrapyrroles |
| D011758 | Pyrroles |
| D001393 | Azoles |
| D006576 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D047028 | Macrocyclic Compounds |
| D011083 | Polycyclic Compounds |