Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study was to evaluate the dimensional alveolar bone changes in immediate post extraction implant placement with loading compared to immediate post extraction implant placement without loading in the maxillary premolar area . The main question it aims to answer is : Can immediate post extraction implant placement in the maxillary premolar area with loading achieve better alveolar bone dimensions than without loading?
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate Implants with loading | Active Comparator |
| |
| Immediate Implants without loading | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| immediate implant placement with or without loading | Procedure | immediate implant placement with or without loading |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Height of alveolar bone crest | After the implants are placed, a series of digital radiographs are obtained at 0 , 3, and 6 months duration to study the changes in the amount of crestal bone level. | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Implant stability | Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were measured with an Osstell® (Integration Diagnostics AB, Gothenburg, Sweden) | 6 months |
| Alveolar bone width | (CBCT) images are used for evaluation of alveolar bone width around all implant sides all over. At 0. 3, 6 month postoperative by using superimposition and subtraction method |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Patients who have at least one non restorable tooth in the maxillary premolar area that needs to be extracted.
2. Patients with healthy systemic condition. 3. Patients aged from 20 to 45 years old. 4. Buccal bone thickness should be at least 1mm. (Morton et al., 2014) 5. Availability of bone apical and palatal to the socket to provide primary stability.(Morton et al., 2014) 6. Good oral hygiene.(Wiesner et al., 2010) 7. Accepts one year follow-up period (cooperative patients) Patient provides an informed consent.
8. Adequate Inter-arch space for implant placement. 9. Favorable occlusion (no traumatic occlusion)
Exclusion Criteria:
- 1. Patients with signs of acute infection related to the area of interest. 2. Patients with habits that may jeopardize the implant longevity and affect the results of the study such as parafunctional habits (Lobbezoo et al., 2006).
3. Current and former smokers (Lambert, Morris and Ochi, 2000) 4. Pregnant females.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cairo University | Cairo | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21239568 | Background | Al-Ekrish AA, Ekram M. A comparative study of the accuracy and reliability of multidetector computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in the assessment of dental implant site dimensions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 Feb;40(2):67-75. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/27546065. | |
| 7246093 | Background | Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long-lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52(2):155-70. doi: 10.3109/17453678108991776. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 6 months |
| post-surgical patient satisfaction | Post-Surgical Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSPSQ) composed of 3 questions is filled by the patient and numerical score is obtained | 6 months |
| 37417616 | Background | AlQahtani SM. A novel method of assessment of BMD using CBCT for implant placement: A retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jul 7;102(27):e34203. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034203. |
| 19515033 | Background | Araujo MG, Lindhe J. Ridge alterations following tooth extraction with and without flap elevation: an experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Jun;20(6):545-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2008.01703.x. |
| 17974108 | Background | Atsumi M, Park SH, Wang HL. Methods used to assess implant stability: current status. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2007 Sep-Oct;22(5):743-54. |
| 18761580 | Background | Bhola M, Neely AL, Kolhatkar S. Immediate implant placement: clinical decisions, advantages, and disadvantages. J Prosthodont. 2008 Oct;17(7):576-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00359.x. Epub 2008 Aug 26. |
| 25426151 | Background | Mantena SR, Sivagami G, Gottumukkala SN. Evaluation of crestal bone loss and stability of immediate functional loading versus immediate non-functional loading of single-mandibular posterior implants: A pilot randomized controlled clinical trial. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2014 Sep;11(5):585-91. |