Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Xiangya Hospital of Central South University | OTHER |
| First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Investigating the efficacy and safety of spinal cord stimulation for patients with disorders of consciousness.
Disorder of Consciousness (DOC) is a highly significant and concerning consequence that frequently ensues various acute brain injuries. The DOC encompasses coma, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS), also known as persistent vegetative state (PVS), and minimally conscious state (MCS). Currently, the available treatments for arousing patients with DOC are relatively limited, encompassing pharmacotherapy, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, neuromodulation, physical rehabilitation exercises, and traditional Chinese acupuncture. Among these approaches, only amantadine and transcranial direct current stimulation have demonstrated efficacy in DOC patients; however, further extensive validation is still warranted.
In recent years, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has emerged as a cutting-edge and extensively researched modality for arousal therapy. SCS is a form of neuromodulation therapy primarily utilized for intractable pain, diabetic neuropathy, and muscle spasticity, the therapeutic efficacy of the SCS is both significant and safe. Although preliminary studies have demonstrated the potential of SCS in promoting arousal in patients with DOC, these findings are currently limited to small sample reports. Therefore, this multicenter randomized controlled trial aims to provide robust evidence on the effectiveness of SCS in promoting arousal among patients with DOC, thereby standardizing its clinical application and offering advanced evidence-based medicine for DOC management.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| SCS group | Experimental | SCS stimulation therapy is initiated 1 week post-surgery, which is administered continuously for a duration of 6 months. |
|
| Sham group | Sham Comparator | Sham stimulation therapy is initiated 1 week post-surgery, and SCS stimulation therapy is initiated 3 months post-surgery, which is stimulated continuously for a duration of 3 months. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCS Stimulation | Procedure | Participants will accept the SCS stimulus for six months |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Effective rate of awakening | The CRS-R is employed, with a minimum of 5 CRS-R assessments conducted at each follow-up time point, accompanied by simultaneous video recording. And the highest value is scored as a state of consciousness. The clinical assessment of participants' consciousness is deemed significantly improved when it fulfills the following criteria: a) MCS- recover to consciousness level of MCS+ or higher; b) MCS status (MCS- or MCS+) recover to emergence from MCS (restoration of functional communication). | SCS stimulation for 3 months after operation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The difference of CRS-R scale relative to baseline between SCS group and Sham group | The Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) is a standardized neurobehavioral assessment measure designed for use in patients with disorders of consciousness. It has good validity, reliability and practicability. | SCS stimulation for 14 days, 1-month-postoperative-stimulation, 3-month-postoperative-stimulation, 6-month-postoperative-stimulation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Security outcome | Incidence of postoperative infections within 3 months after operation | 3 months after operation |
| Security outcome | Incidence of postoperative hemorrhage within 3 months after operation |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xuehai Wu, Ph.D. | Contact | +8613764880571 | Wuxuehai2013@163.com | |
| Lijian Lang, M.M. | Contact | +8613896851367 | lang_lijian@163.com |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Xuehai Wu, Ph.D. | Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University | Recruiting | Fuzhou | Fujian | 350000 | China |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25528282 | Background | van Erp WS, Lavrijsen JC, Vos PE, Bor H, Laureys S, Koopmans RT. The vegetative state: prevalence, misdiagnosis, and treatment limitations. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015 Jan;16(1):85.e9-85.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2014.10.014. | |
| 36183712 | Background | Maas AIR, Menon DK, Manley GT, Abrams M, Akerlund C, Andelic N, Aries M, Bashford T, Bell MJ, Bodien YG, Brett BL, Buki A, Chesnut RM, Citerio G, Clark D, Clasby B, Cooper DJ, Czeiter E, Czosnyka M, Dams-O'Connor K, De Keyser V, Diaz-Arrastia R, Ercole A, van Essen TA, Falvey E, Ferguson AR, Figaji A, Fitzgerald M, Foreman B, Gantner D, Gao G, Giacino J, Gravesteijn B, Guiza F, Gupta D, Gurnell M, Haagsma JA, Hammond FM, Hawryluk G, Hutchinson P, van der Jagt M, Jain S, Jain S, Jiang JY, Kent H, Kolias A, Kompanje EJO, Lecky F, Lingsma HF, Maegele M, Majdan M, Markowitz A, McCrea M, Meyfroidt G, Mikolic A, Mondello S, Mukherjee P, Nelson D, Nelson LD, Newcombe V, Okonkwo D, Oresic M, Peul W, Pisica D, Polinder S, Ponsford J, Puybasset L, Raj R, Robba C, Roe C, Rosand J, Schueler P, Sharp DJ, Smielewski P, Stein MB, von Steinbuchel N, Stewart W, Steyerberg EW, Stocchetti N, Temkin N, Tenovuo O, Theadom A, Thomas I, Espin AT, Turgeon AF, Unterberg A, Van Praag D, van Veen E, Verheyden J, Vyvere TV, Wang KKW, Wiegers EJA, Williams WH, Wilson L, Wisniewski SR, Younsi A, Yue JK, Yuh EL, Zeiler FA, Zeldovich M, Zemek R; InTBIR Participants and Investigators. Traumatic brain injury: progress and challenges in prevention, clinical care, and research. Lancet Neurol. 2022 Nov;21(11):1004-1060. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00309-X. Epub 2022 Sep 29. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003244 | Consciousness Disorders |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019954 | Neurobehavioral Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study is being conducted as a double-blind trial, wherein the surgeons, assessors and participants' family members are kept unaware of the assigned research groups. However, it is necessary to inform the physicians responsible for adjustment of stimulation parameters about the allocation of participants. Follow-up assessments of participants after stimulation will be conducted by an independent assessor using standardized evaluation criteria.
| Sham Stimulation |
| Procedure |
Sham stimulation will be performed in the first three months after surgery, and SCS stimulation will be started in the fourth month after surgery |
|
| The difference of SECONDs scale relative to baseline between SCS group and Sham group | The Simplified Evaluation of CONsciousness Disorders (SECONDs) is a fast tool to assess consciousness in brain-injured patients. | SCS stimulation for 14 days, 1-month-postoperative-stimulation, 3-month-postoperative-stimulation, 6-month-postoperative-stimulation |
| The difference of modified Ashworth scale relative to baseline between SCS group and Sham group | The modified Ashworth scale is the most universally accepted clinical tool used to measure the increase of muscle tone. | SCS stimulation for 14 days, 1-month-postoperative-stimulation, 3-month-postoperative-stimulation, 6-month-postoperative-stimulation |
| The NCS-R scale relative to baseline between SCS group and Sham group | The Nociception Coma Scale-Revised (NCS-R) was developed to help assess pain in patients with disorders of consciousness (DOC). Several studies have shown its sensitivity in assessing response to acute noxious stimuli. | SCS stimulation for 14 days, 1-month-postoperative-stimulation, 3-month-postoperative-stimulation, 6-month-postoperative-stimulation |
| The difference of effective rate of awakening between SCS group and Sham group by SECONDs scale | SCS stimulation for 3-month-postoperative-stimulation |
| SCS stimulation for 6-month-postoperative-stimulation, the difference of effective rate of awakening between SCS group and Sham group by CRS-R scale | SCS stimulation for 6-month-postoperative-stimulation |
| The difference of effective rate of awakening between SCS group and Sham group by SECONDs scale | SCS stimulation for 6-month-postoperative-stimulation |
| The difference of recovery trajectories of consciousness level between SCS group and Sham group | SCS stimulation for 6-month-postoperative-stimulation |
| The difference of effective rate of awakening of 3 month s of sham stimulation and 3 month s of SCS stimulation in Sham group | 6-month-postoperation |
| 3 months after operation |
| Xiangya Hospital,Central South University | Recruiting | Changsha | Hunan | 410000 | China |
|
| Department of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University | Recruiting | Shanghai | Shanghai Municipality | 200000 | China |
|
| 30878104 | Background | Wu S, Wu B, Liu M, Chen Z, Wang W, Anderson CS, Sandercock P, Wang Y, Huang Y, Cui L, Pu C, Jia J, Zhang T, Liu X, Zhang S, Xie P, Fan D, Ji X, Wong KL, Wang L; China Stroke Study Collaboration. Stroke in China: advances and challenges in epidemiology, prevention, and management. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Apr;18(4):394-405. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30500-3. |
| 7818633 | Background | Multi-Society Task Force on PVS. Medical aspects of the persistent vegetative state (1). N Engl J Med. 1994 May 26;330(21):1499-508. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199405263302107. |
| 11839831 | Background | Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, Cranford R, Jennett B, Katz DI, Kelly JP, Rosenberg JH, Whyte J, Zafonte RD, Zasler ND. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2002 Feb 12;58(3):349-53. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.3.349. |
| 24574549 | Background | Thibaut A, Bruno MA, Ledoux D, Demertzi A, Laureys S. tDCS in patients with disorders of consciousness: sham-controlled randomized double-blind study. Neurology. 2014 Apr 1;82(13):1112-8. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000000260. Epub 2014 Feb 26. |
| 22375973 | Background | Giacino JT, Whyte J, Bagiella E, Kalmar K, Childs N, Khademi A, Eifert B, Long D, Katz DI, Cho S, Yablon SA, Luther M, Hammond FM, Nordenbo A, Novak P, Mercer W, Maurer-Karattup P, Sherer M. Placebo-controlled trial of amantadine for severe traumatic brain injury. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):819-26. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102609. |
| 35263267 | Background | Denison T, Morrell MJ. Neuromodulation in 2035: The Neurology Future Forecasting Series. Neurology. 2022 Jan 11;98(2):65-72. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013061. |
| 33818600 | Background | Petersen EA, Stauss TG, Scowcroft JA, Brooks ES, White JL, Sills SM, Amirdelfan K, Guirguis MN, Xu J, Yu C, Nairizi A, Patterson DG, Tsoulfas KC, Creamer MJ, Galan V, Bundschu RH, Paul CA, Mehta ND, Choi H, Sayed D, Lad SP, DiBenedetto DJ, Sethi KA, Goree JH, Bennett MT, Harrison NJ, Israel AF, Chang P, Wu PW, Gekht G, Argoff CE, Nasr CE, Taylor RS, Subbaroyan J, Gliner BE, Caraway DL, Mekhail NA. Effect of High-frequency (10-kHz) Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2021 Jun 1;78(6):687-698. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0538. |
| 36255427 | Background | Hara S, Andresen H, Solheim O, Carlsen SM, Sundstrom T, Lonne G, Lonne VV, Taraldsen K, Tronvik EA, Oie LR, Gulati AM, Sagberg LM, Jakola AS, Solberg TK, Nygaard OP, Salvesen OO, Gulati S. Effect of Spinal Cord Burst Stimulation vs Placebo Stimulation on Disability in Patients With Chronic Radicular Pain After Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2022 Oct 18;328(15):1506-1514. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.18231. |
| 31870766 | Background | Mekhail N, Levy RM, Deer TR, Kapural L, Li S, Amirdelfan K, Hunter CW, Rosen SM, Costandi SJ, Falowski SM, Burgher AH, Pope JE, Gilmore CA, Qureshi FA, Staats PS, Scowcroft J, Carlson J, Kim CK, Yang MI, Stauss T, Poree L; Evoke Study Group. Long-term safety and efficacy of closed-loop spinal cord stimulation to treat chronic back and leg pain (Evoke): a double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2020 Feb;19(2):123-134. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30414-4. Epub 2019 Dec 20. |
| 8455763 | Background | North RB, Kidd DH, Zahurak M, James CS, Long DM. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic, intractable pain: experience over two decades. Neurosurgery. 1993 Mar;32(3):384-94; discussion 394-5. doi: 10.1227/00006123-199303000-00008. |
| 2812256 | Background | Funahashi K, Komai N, Ogura M, Kuwata T, Nakai M, Tsuji N. [Effects and indications of spinal cord stimulation on the vegetative syndrome]. No Shinkei Geka. 1989 Oct;17(10):917-23. Japanese. |
| 22151220 | Background | Kanno T, Morita I, Yamaguchi S, Yokoyama T, Kamei Y, Anil SM, Karagiozov KL. Dorsal column stimulation in persistent vegetative state. Neuromodulation. 2009 Jan;12(1):33-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2009.00185.x. |
| 37889524 | Background | Piedade GS, Assumpcao de Monaco B, Guest JD, Cordeiro JG. Review of spinal cord stimulation for disorders of consciousness. Curr Opin Neurol. 2023 Dec 1;36(6):507-515. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001222. Epub 2023 Oct 26. |
| 25760739 | Background | Kinfe TM, Pintea B, Vatter H. Is Spinal Cord Stimulation Useful and Safe for the Treatment of Chronic Pain of Ischemic Origin? A Review. Clin J Pain. 2016 Jan;32(1):7-13. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000229. |
| 30089618 | Background | Giacino JT, Katz DI, Schiff ND, Whyte J, Ashman EJ, Ashwal S, Barbano R, Hammond FM, Laureys S, Ling GSF, Nakase-Richardson R, Seel RT, Yablon S, Getchius TSD, Gronseth GS, Armstrong MJ. Practice guideline update recommendations summary: Disorders of consciousness: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research. Neurology. 2018 Sep 4;91(10):450-460. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000005926. Epub 2018 Aug 8. |
| 31003899 | Background | Thibaut A, Schiff N, Giacino J, Laureys S, Gosseries O. Therapeutic interventions in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness. Lancet Neurol. 2019 Jun;18(6):600-614. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30031-6. Epub 2019 Apr 16. |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D019965 | Neurocognitive Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |