Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Aim of study: this study will be conducted for Comparative Evaluation Of Two Bone-Anchored Maxillary Molar Distalization Appliances: Direct Versus Indirect Anchorage.
Material and methods: The study will consist of two groups, each group has 10 Patients. The patients will be selected from the outpatient clinic of the orthodontic department at Mansoura University.
Patients will be divided into 2 groups, group 1 will be treated by direct bone anchored pull distal slider, and group 2 by indirect bone anchored dual force distalizer.
Aim of study:
this study will be conducted for Comparative Evaluation Of Two Bone-Anchored Maxillary Molar Distalization Appliances: Direct Versus Indirect Anchorage.
Participant and eligibility criteria:
The study will consist of two groups, each group has 10 Patients. The patients will be selected from the outpatient clinic of the orthodontic department at Mansoura University. pretreatment records will be taken including: intraoral and extraoral photographs, study models, panoramic radiographs, and lateral cephalometric radiographs.
Intervention:
written and informed consents will be taken from the patients.
Group 1:
Group 2:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct bone anchored pull distal slider | Experimental | The appliance will be cemented on the maxillary first molars and two miniscrews will be placed in their positions. The appliance will be activated by closed coil spring, which apply 300g force. |
|
| Indirect bone anchored dual force distalizer. | Experimental | The appliance will be cemented on the teeth and two miniscrews will be placed in their positions. Activated by compressing the NiTi open coil spring from the buccal and palatal sides. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct bone anchored pull distal slider | Device | distalization from the palatal side only. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Anteroposterior skeletal measurements | From the lateral cephalometric, the maxillary and mandibular sagittal positions will be measured according to the SN plane, before and after distalization. | 8 months |
| Vertical skeletal measurements | From the lateral cephalometric, mandibular plane angle according to the SN plane and Frankfort horizontal plane, will be measured before and after distalization. | 8 months |
| Dental angular measurements | From the lateral cephalometric, the angle between teeth (maxillary central incisor, first premolar, second premolar, first molar) and the SN plane will be measured before and after distalization to measure the amount of tipping. | 8 months |
| Amount of distalization | From the lateral cephalometric, the distance between teeth (maxillary central incisor, first premolar, second premolar, first molar) and the pterygoid vertical (PTV) plane will be measured before and after distalization to calculate the amount of distalization in mm. | 8 months |
| Amount of intrusion | From the lateral cephalometric, the distance between teeth (maxillary central incisor, first premolar, second premolar, first molar) and the palatal plane (PP) will be measured before and after distalization to calculate the amount of intrusion in mm. . | 8months |
| Amount of expansion | From the study model, the maxillary inter-canine, inter-first premolar, inter-second premolar, inter-first molar, and inter-second molar widths will be measured before and after distalization to calculate the amount of expansion in mm. |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zeyad M Ali, BDS | Contact | 00201030172652 | 0020 | zeyadqaddomy@yahoo.com |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Faculty of Dentistry | Recruiting | Al Mansurah | Egypt |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 40533287 | Derived | Ali ZM, Shamaa MS, Mohammad MH. Comparison of direct and indirect skeletal anchorage for maxillary molar distalization in Class II malocclusion: A prospective clinical study. J World Fed Orthod. 2025 Oct;14(5):251-258. doi: 10.1016/j.ejwf.2025.05.002. Epub 2025 Jun 17. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Indirect bone anchored dual force distalizer. | Device | distalization from the palatal and buccal sides. |
|
| 8 months |
| Amount of rotation | From the study model, the angle between buccopalatal axis of teeth (maxillary first premolar, second premolar, first molar) and the midpalatal suture will be measured before and after distalization to calculate the amount of rotation. | 8 months |