Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Efficacy signal substantial enough to more to larger study
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Lubris, LLC | UNKNOWN |
| Sydney Eye Hospital | UNKNOWN |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
rhPRG4-GVHD-001 is a prospective multi-center study conducted in Australia to evaluate the safety and efficacy of topically-applied rhPRG4 in subjects with moderate to severe dry eye secondary to chronic GVHD.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| rhPRG4 | Drug | Sterile isotonic aqueous solution containing rhPRG4 (450 µg/mL) for topical administration, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride & 0.01% polysorbate 20 at pH 7.2. In all subjects, both eyes will be treated |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 using the average VAS score assessing subjects' eye dryness (Question: Rate the dryness of your eye; anchors: 0 = no discomfort, 100 = maximal discomfort) at Day 28 | 28 | |
| To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 using the total corneal staining with fluorescein (Oxford Scale) at Day 28 | 28 | |
| To assess the safety of rhPRG4 by observation of the frequency and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events | 28 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 using the average VAS score for foreign body sensation, burning/stinging, itching, pain, sticky feeling, blurred vision and photophobia and total VAS (anchors: not at all & very) | 28 | |
| To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 using the maximum inter-eye tear osmolarity: max(OU) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Diagnosis and Main Criteria for Inclusion:
All to be queried and checked at the screening visit (V1):
Exclusion Criteria:
Diagnosis and Main Criteria for Exclusion:
Evidence of an active ocular infection in either eye;
History or presence of ocular surface disorders not related to oGVHD in either eye, including but not limited to significant conjunctivochalasis, superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis, limbal stem cell deficiency, allergic conjunctivitis, giant papillary conjunctivitis, atopic keratoconjunctivitis, anterior basement membrane dystrophies, neurotrophic keratitis, corneal dystrophy, exposure keratitis and moderate to severe blepharitis;
History of any ocular surgery (including laser or refractive surgical procedures) in either eye within 90 days before study enrollment. Ocular surgery will not be allowed during the study treatment period and elective ocular surgery procedures should not be planned during the duration of the follow-up period;
Initiation of new therapeutic modalities within 30 days of recruitment;
Artificial rescue tears are allowed as long as they are recorded in a diary;
Known hypersensitivity to one of the components of the study or procedural medications;
Participation in another clinical study at the same time as the present study or within 60 days of screening/baseline visit;
History of drug, medication or alcohol abuse or addiction;
Females of childbearing potential (those who are not surgically sterilized or post-menopausal for at least 1 year) are excluded from participation in the study if they meet any one of the following conditions:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sydney Eye Hospital | Sydney | New South Wales | Australia | |||
| OTA |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| 28 |
| To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 using the absolute difference in inter-eye tear film breakup time (TBUT): min(OU)osmolarity: abs(OD - OS) | 28 |
| To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 using the number of instillations of rescue artificial tear per day | 28 |
| To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 using a patient questionnaire | 28 |
| To assess the efficacy of rhPRG4 by NIH Eye Score | 28 |
| To assess the safety of rhPRG4 by observation of the Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) | 28 |
| To assess the safety of rhPRG4 by observation of signs evaluated by slit lamp (SLE) | 28 |
| To assess the safety of rhPRG4 by observation of intraocular pressure (IOP) | 28 |
| Brisbane |
| Queensland |
| Australia |