Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of two artificial intelligence (AI) models in predicting the need for ICU admissions. By comparing the AI models' predictions with actual clinical decisions, we aim to determine their accuracy and potential utility in clinical decision support.
Intensive care units (ICUs) are critical components of healthcare systems, providing life-saving care to patients with severe and life-threatening conditions. Timely and accurate prediction of ICU admission needs is essential for improving patient outcomes and optimizing hospital resource allocation. Delayed ICU admissions have been consistently associated with higher morbidity and mortality rates. With the advent of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare, there is an opportunity to enhance clinical decision-making by leveraging AI models to predict ICU needs accurately. AI models, such as ChatGPT and Gemini, can process vast amounts of complex data to identify patterns that might not be immediately evident to human clinicians, potentially improving the speed and accuracy of ICU admission decisions.
This is an observational retrospective study. Data were collected from electronic health records (EHRs) from a hospital retrospectively.
Data were extracted from EHRs and included:
Demographic data: Age, gender, and basic patient characteristics. Clinical parameters: Medication information, consultation details, ECG findings, imaging results, comorbid conditions (e.g., diabetes mellitus, hypertension, heart failure, COPD, cerebrovascular events), and laboratory values (e.g., hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet count, PT, INR, procalcitonin, ALT, AST, bilirubin, sodium, potassium, chloride, glucose, creatinine, urea, albumin, thyroid function tests).
Prediction data: AI model predictions and actual ICU admission decisions.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anesthesiologists Decision | Intensive Care Unit Follow up need is decided by anesthesiologists. |
| |
| Artificial Intelligence Decision | Intensive Care Unit Follow up need is decided by Artificial Intelligence |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Follow up Decision | Other | 0: No need to follow up in Intensive Care Unit 1: Need to follow up in Intensive Care Unit |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Intensive Care Unit Need | The primary outcome measure of this study is the accuracy of the predictions made by the artificial intelligence (AI) models, ChatGPT and Gemini, regarding the need for ICU admissions. This will be evaluated by comparing the AI model predictions to the actual clinical decisions made regarding ICU admissions. | 1 day |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients over the age of 18 of both genders who are consulted for anesthesia regarding intensive care needs will be included in the study.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Engin ihsan Turan, Specialist | Health Science University İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Education and Training Hospital | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Health Science University İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Education and Training Hospital | Istanbul | 34303 | Turkey (Türkiye) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided