Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The investigators developed a brief set of subjective health measures designed to feel more relevant to patients seeking musculoskeletal specialty care, presented the scores to patients and clinicians using an easy-to-understand visual display, and measured whether or not this process harmed patient experience.
Musculoskeletal patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs; measures of levels of discomfort and incapability) were originally designed as tools for clinical research as were other self-reported measures of the subjective aspects of illness such as mental health measures. PROMs and mental health measures are increasingly used in clinical practice with individual patients. A few areas for improvement are noted in the use of questionnaires in musculoskeletal specialty care, including relevancy, understandability, and their confusing use in heath strategies. The investigators sought to assess the impact of an enhanced and more personalized self-reported health measurement strategy to address some of these opportunities by developing a brief set of items addressing levels of discomfort, incapability, mental, and social health designed to feel relevant to musculoskeletal specialty care and resulting in an easy-to-understand display that can be a communication tool for patients and clinicians.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Placebo Comparator | Usual patient reported outcome measures |
|
| Experimental | Experimental | Usual patient reported outcome measures + new visual display of responses to subjective health questions |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relevant Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) | Behavioral | Depending on the participant's complaint: Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score JR (HOOS JR), Knee disability and osteoarthritis outcome score JR (KOOS JR), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QUICKDASH), Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9), General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD7), Patient Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ-2), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS Global 10) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| CollaboRATE survey | Quality of shared decision-making (Numerical scale from 1-27; Higher scores equal better outcome) | Immediately after the intervention |
| Jefferson Scale Patient Perceptions of Physician Empathy (JSPPPE) | Patient perceived clinician empathy (Numerical scale from 1-35; Higher scores equal better outcome) | Immediately after the intervention |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Prakash Jayakumar, MD. PhD | University of Texas at Austin | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Texas at Austin | Austin | Texas | 78701 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Background | Neil W. Wagle MM (2017) Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. NEJM Catal | ||
| 23768763 | Background | Elwyn G, Barr PJ, Grande SW, Thompson R, Walsh T, Ozanne EM. Developing CollaboRATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Oct;93(1):102-7. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.05.009. Epub 2013 Jun 12. | |
| 34311981 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| My Whole Health Map | Other | Short visual map of responses to 10 questions of subjective measures. |
|
| Background |
| Amini M, Oemrawsingh A, Verweij LM, Lingsma HF, Hazelzet JA, Eijkenaar F, van Leeuwen N. Facilitators and barriers for implementing patient-reported outcome measures in clinical care: An academic center's initial experience. Health Policy. 2021 Sep;125(9):1247-1255. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.07.001. Epub 2021 Jul 8. |