Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Toe transfers are perceived to have changed the landscape of the injured hand over the last half century, yet there are limited validated data that unequivocally support the functional role of toe transfers after traumatic digital amputation. There also remain unanswered questions about what factors critically influence functional outcomes, be it sensory recovery, grip strength or other modality. Furthermore, the use of validated patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in large series of toe transfers with long term follow up, is lacking.
Finger amputations are associated with profound impacts on physical, socio-economic, vocational and mental well-being. Thumb amputations account for the greatest burden of disability globally amongst hand trauma.
The multi-centre FRANCHISE study and a recent large prospective multi-centre study have demonstrated that finger replantation outperforms equivalent amputations in nearly all digits at all levels, except for the little finger. However, one crucial question in hand surgery is whether toe transfers can provide a similar functional benefit to replantation.
Finger amputations are frequently not replantable even with timely access to specialized reconstructive care. A review of replantation in the USA found that of 3,417 digital amputations, only 631 replantations were attempted (18%), and of these 30% failed. Therefore nearly 90% of patients with finger amputations will ultimately live without the amputated digit.
Microvascular toe-to-hand transfer, first described in the 1960s, has a success rate close to 100% in high volume centres. There are few validated data that support the functional benefits of toe transfer, with the majority of outcome studies focusing on operative survival rates, physical measurements such as grip strength, or employ unvalidated scales and self-created questionnaires. More data, in larger more representative populations, using validated PROMs, is required.
Here, we aim to demonstrate using PROMS that the role of toe transfers has equivalent or improved functional benefits, with comparison to finger replantation. Additionally, this study aims to identify physical factors that have the greatest influence on patient reported outcomes. This may answer fundamental questions regarding optimum strategies for the design of toe transfers.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Toe transfer | Patients who have undergone toe to hand transfer |
| |
| Replantation | Patients who have undergone finger replantation |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toe transfer | Procedure | Toe-to-hand transfer |
| |
| Replantation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Michigan Hand Questionnaire | Validated Hand function patient reported outcome measured. 0-100. Higher is better | Single time-point, on average 22 years after surgery |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Short Form 36 | Short Form 36 Quality of Life. 0-100. Higher is better | Single time-point, on average 22 years after surgery |
| Foot Function Index | Validated foot function Patient reported outcome measure. 0-100. Lower is better |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Range of motion | Total active range of motion of digit. Measured in degrees per digit | Single time-point, on average 22 years after surgery |
| Grip strength | Measured with hand dynamometer. Measured in kilograms. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients operated on by single surgeon (FCW) at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from 1983 to 2015, with at least 5 years follow up at time of inclusion to study
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Fu Chan Wei, FACS | Chang Gung Memorial Hospital | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
Data subject to privacy and legal restrictions - not yet decided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012092 | Replantation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014180 | Transplantation |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Procedure |
Finger or thumb replantation after amputation |
|
|
| Single time-point, on average 22 years after surgery |
| Aesthetic evaluation | Subjective evaluation of toe transfer appearance using a Visual Analogue Scale, not validated | Longitudinal. 3 timepoints: 1 day before surgery, 1 day after surgery, and on average 22 years after surgery |
| Single time-point, on average 22 years after surgery |
| Sensation | Measured with discriminator device. Two point discrimination measured in millimetres | Single time-point, on average 22 years after surgery |