Comparison Between the Efficacy of CIMT and NDT Along With Conventional Physiotherapy Treatment on Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Among Patients of Stroke

Comparison Between the Efficacy of CIMT and NDT Along With Conventional Physiotherapy Treatment on Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Among Patients of Stroke

To compare the efficacy of CIMT and NDT among stroke patients To study the phenomena of transfer of training To study relationship between the MMSE score and stroke rehabilitation

This research aims to provide a comprehensive comparison of CIMT and NDT, supplemented by conventional physiotherapy, in the rehabilitation of upper extremity function among stroke patients. The findings will inform clinical practice, guiding the development of optimized, patient-centered rehabilitation strategies.

Inclusion Criteria:

• Participants will be aged 40-65 years and will have experienced either a hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke with hemiplegic presentation within the past 1 to 6 months. Additionally, they must have a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score of 23.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Participants with visual or auditory deficits, musculoskeletal (MSK) disorders, mental impairments, or a history of surgery will be excluded from the study.