Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
the study will be conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of direct Nanohybrid resin composite veneer restorations applied with or without modeling resin
ChatGPT This study aims to investigate the impact of modeling resin on the clinical performance of direct nanohybrid resin composite veneer restorations in anterior teeth. Resin composites are widely used in dental restorations due to their aesthetic qualities, but issues like discoloration and surface roughness can affect their longevity and patient satisfaction. Modeling resin, used to aid in composite placement and sculpting, has become common, but concerns exist regarding its effects on composite properties, particularly long-term color stability.
The research will employ a randomized controlled trial design with a two-arm parallel approach. Adult patients (18-45 years) with anterior tooth defects suitable for composite veneer restoration will be recruited. The intervention group will receive nanohybrid resin composite with modeling resin, while the comparator group will receive the composite without modeling resin. Outcomes will be assessed using modified USPHS criteria, including color stability, color match, anatomical form, marginal adaptation, marginal discoloration, retention rate, presence of secondary caries, and postoperative sensitivity, at baseline and at follow-up intervals of 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.
Statistical analysis will involve independent t-tests for intergroup comparisons and repeated measures ANOVA for intragroup comparisons, with a significance level set at 0.05. The study aims to determine if the use of modeling resin influences the clinical outcomes of resin composite veneer restorations. Ethics approval will be obtained, and confidentiality of participant data will be strictly maintained throughout the study period.
Overall, this research seeks to provide insights into optimizing the application of resin composites in dental practice to enhance patient outcomes and satisfaction
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| intervention | Experimental | the use of Modeling resin as the last layer applied to the NanoHybrid composite direct veneer |
|
| comparator | Active Comparator | the regular application of the NanoHybrid composite as a direct anterior veneer restoration |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modeling Resin | Device | it is the application of Modeling liquid to make easier manipulation and sculpting the composite veneer and reflect on its physical properties and clinical performance |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| comparison of Color stability with and without the intervention | by using Spectrophotometer to measure the color considering the intervention | baseline and after one year |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| comparing the effect of the intervention on color match | using the modefied USPHS criteria | baseline and after one year |
| comparing the effect of the intervention on anatomical form | using the modefied USPHS criteria |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
• Adults (18-45Ys) with anterior tooth defects indicated for direct composite veneer restoration.
Exclusion Criteria:
Periapical pathosis or signs of pulpal pathology.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah A. Azzazy, postgrad | Contact | +02 10 18 300 996 | sarah.azzazy@dentistry.cu.edu.eg | |
| Asmaa A. Yassen, professor | Contact | +02 100 191 2610 | Asmaa.Yassen@dentistry.cu.edu.eg |
Not provided
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26850844 | Background | Munchow EA, Sedrez-Porto JA, Piva E, Pereira-Cenci T, Cenci MS. Use of dental adhesives as modeler liquid of resin composites. Dent Mater. 2016 Apr;32(4):570-7. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Feb 3. | |
| 21104100 | Background | Stefanski S, van Dijken JW. Clinical performance of a nanofilled resin composite with and without an intermediary layer of flowable composite: a 2-year evaluation. Clin Oral Investig. 2012 Feb;16(1):147-53. doi: 10.1007/s00784-010-0485-8. Epub 2010 Nov 23. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D057085 | Tooth Wear |
| D003731 | Dental Caries |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014076 | Tooth Diseases |
| D009057 | Stomatognathic Diseases |
| D017001 | Tooth Demineralization |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| baseline and after one year |
| comparing the effect of the intervention on surface texture | using the modefied USPHS criteria | baseline and after one year |
| comparing the effect of the intervention on marginal adaptation | using the modefied USPHS criteria | baseline and after one year |
| comparing the effect of the intervention on marginal discoloration | using the modefied USPHS criteria | baseline and after one year |
| comparing the effect of the intervention on retention rate | using the modefied USPHS criteria | baseline and after one year |
| comparing the effect of the intervention on postoperative sensitivity | using the modefied USPHS criteria | baseline and after one year |
| comparing the effect of the intervention on recurrent caries | using the modefied USPHS criteria | baseline and after one year |
| 9807133 | Result | Rosentritt M, Esch J, Behr M, Leibrock A, Handel G. In vivo color stability of resin composite veneers and acrylic resin teeth in removable partial dentures. Quintessence Int. 1998 Aug;29(8):517-22. |
| 37091274 | Result | Al-Asmar AA, Ha Sabrah A, Abd-Raheam IM, Ismail NH, Oweis YG. Clinical evaluation of reasons for replacement of amalgam vs composite posterior restorations. Saudi Dent J. 2023 Mar;35(3):275-281. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.02.003. Epub 2023 Mar 4. |
| 30820089 | Result | Bhadra D, Shah NC, Kishan KV, Dedania MS. An in vitro comparative evaluation of commonly consumed catechu and catechu with lime on surface roughness and color stability of the conventional nano-hybrid composite. J Conserv Dent. 2019 Jan-Feb;22(1):87-91. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_181_18. |
| 34497023 | Result | Crins LAMJ, Opdam NJM, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, Sterenborg BAMM, Huysmans MCDNJM, Loomans BAC. Randomized controlled trial on the performance of direct and indirect composite restorations in patients with severe tooth wear. Dent Mater. 2021 Nov;37(11):1645-1654. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2021.08.018. Epub 2021 Sep 6. |
| 28902236 | Result | Demarco FF, Collares K, Correa MB, Cenci MS, Moraes RR, Opdam NJ. Should my composite restorations last forever? Why are they failing? Braz Oral Res. 2017 Aug 28;31(suppl 1):e56. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2017.vol31.0056. |
| 31737981 | Result | Cortopassi LS, Shimokawa CAK, Willers AE, Sobral MAP. Surface roughness and color stability of surface sealants and adhesive systems applied over a resin-based composite. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020 Jan;32(1):64-72. doi: 10.1111/jerd.12548. Epub 2019 Nov 18. |
| 23162586 | Result | Malekipour MR, Sharafi A, Kazemi S, Khazaei S, Shirani F. Comparison of color stability of a composite resin in different color media. Dent Res J (Isfahan). 2012 Jul;9(4):441-6. |
| 27563176 | Result | Gianordoli-Neto R, Padovani GC, Mondelli J, de Lima Navarro MF, Mendonca JS, Santiago SL. Two-year clinical evaluation of resin composite in posterior teeth: A randomized controlled study. J Conserv Dent. 2016 Jul-Aug;19(4):306-10. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.186446. |
| 25773188 | Result | Heintze SD, Rousson V, Hickel R. Clinical effectiveness of direct anterior restorations--a meta-analysis. Dent Mater. 2015 May;31(5):481-95. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2015.01.015. Epub 2015 Mar 13. |
| 37018806 | Result | Maia TS, Lima TD, Ramos VM, Faria-E-Silva AL, Menezes MS. Effect of modeling liquids on resin composite roughness and color parameters after staining and toothbrushing. Braz Oral Res. 2023 Mar 31;37:e024. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2023.vol37.0024. eCollection 2023. |
| 35683057 | Result | Paolone G, Mazzitelli C, Josic U, Scotti N, Gherlone E, Cantatore G, Breschi L. Modeling Liquids and Resin-Based Dental Composite Materials-A Scoping Review. Materials (Basel). 2022 May 24;15(11):3759. doi: 10.3390/ma15113759. |
| 36547038 | Result | Pizzolotto L, Moraes RR. Resin Composites in Posterior Teeth: Clinical Performance and Direct Restorative Techniques. Dent J (Basel). 2022 Nov 27;10(12):222. doi: 10.3390/dj10120222. |
| 19822994 | Result | Cetin AR, Unlu N. One-year clinical evaluation of direct nanofilled and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. Dent Mater J. 2009 Sep;28(5):620-6. doi: 10.4012/dmj.28.620. |
| 27556554 | Result | Sedrez-Porto JA, Munchow EA, Brondani LP, Cenci MS, Pereira-Cenci T. Effects of modeling liquid/resin and polishing on the color change of resin composite. Braz Oral Res. 2016 Aug 18;30(1):S1806-83242016000100275. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0088. |