Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Nevro Corp | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects over 230 million adults worldwide and is a highly morbid, costly, and disabling condition. Ischemic leg pain drives disability in PAD patients and results from oxygen supply-demand mismatch, autonomic dysfunction, and muscle breakdown. This leg pain, which is unresponsive to traditional pharmacotherapy, limits the patient's tolerance to exercise, which is an important disease-modifying intervention. Spinal cord stimulation is a well-established therapy for medically intractable pain, including painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) and ischemic pain, but is not part of the standard-of-care for PAD despite limited promising clinical data. Early studies used first-generation, tonic stimulation devices, but with these it was impossible to perform sham-controlled trials to test the treatment. Since then, new types of waveform treatments, including high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (SCS), have been shown to be more effective in the treatment of intractable pain. While high-frequency SCS is approved for PDN treatment, it has never been tested in the treatment of claudication pain from PAD.
This study will enroll up to 15 participants between the ages of 19 and 89 who have PAD and PDN and are successfully implanted with a permanent SCS. Twelve weeks after SCS implantation, participants will receive two weeks of stimulation and two weeks of sham intervention, in random starting order. Blood flow, blood pressure, skin oxygen levels, and participant reported pain int the lower extremities will be assessed before SCS implantation, 12 weeks after SCS implantation and during each of the treatment periods. Participants will also complete a quality of life survey at the same time points. Comparisons of these measurements with the baseline and post-implantation measurements to determine the effects of SCS.
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects over 230 million adults worldwide and is a highly morbid, costly, and disabling condition. Ischemic leg pain drives disability in PAD patients and results from oxygen supply-demand mismatch, autonomic dysfunction, and muscle breakdown. This leg pain, which is unresponsive to traditional pharmacotherapy, limits the patient's tolerance to exercise, which is an important disease-modifying intervention. Spinal cord stimulation is a well-established therapy for medically intractable pain, including painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) and ischemic pain, but is not part of the standard-of-care for PAD despite limited promising clinical data. Early studies used first-generation, tonic stimulation devices, but with these it was impossible to perform sham-controlled trials to test the treatment. Since then, new types of waveform treatments, including high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (SCS), have been shown to be more effective in the treatment of intractable pain. While high-frequency SCS is approved for PDN treatment, it has never been tested in the treatment of claudication pain from PAD.
This study will enroll up to 15 participants between the ages of 19 and 89 who have PAD (ankle-brachial index under 0.90 or vascular imaging, and experience pain from walking with a pain level of at least 6 cm for at least 3 months )and PDN and who meet inclusion criteria for permanent spinal cord stimulator (SCS) placement. Participants must also have diabetes with symptoms of neuropathy, have a starting pain level of at least 5 cm on a visual pain scale and Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire score of 5.5 or less.
The study begins with an initial evaluation visit, then a follow-up visit 12 weeks after permanent SCS implantation and optimization. Participants will then be randomized to start in the SCS group or the sham intervention group. Each of these interventions will be conducted for two weeks, then participants will switch to the other intervention in a cross over design. Blood flow, blood pressure, skin oxygen levels, and participant reported pain int the lower extremities will be assessed before SCS implantation, 12 weeks after SCS implantation and during each of the treatment periods. Participants will also complete a quality of life survey at the same time points. Comparisons of these measurements with the baseline and post-implantation measurements to determine the effects of SCS. The study intervention lasts for 4 weeks, after which participants will return to standard SCS care.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active Spinal Cord Stimulation | Experimental | Therapeutic spinal cord stimulation titrated at 12 weeks post operative at standard clinical practice. |
|
| Sham Stimulation | Sham Comparator | Sub-threshold low frequency spinal cord stimulation to provide no analgesic benefit but serve as a sham control. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spinal cord stimulation | Device | active spinal cord stimulation |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| High-frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation Effect on Analgesia | The visual analogue scale (VAS) will be used by participants to report lower extremity pain during interventions. The VAS score is a10-cm line that represents a continuum between "no pain" and "worst pain." | Baseline, 12 week follow-up after permanent spinal cord simulator, week 14 intervention #1 , week 16 intervention #2 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| High-frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation Effect on Quality of Life | Quality of life changes from high-frequency high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (SCS) will be measured by the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire (VASCUQOL). This instrument has 25 questions covering pain, symptoms, activities, social, and emotional. Each question has seven responses from 1 (worst) to 7 (best). | Baseline, 12 week follow up after permanent spinal cord simulator, week 14 intervention #1 , week 16 intervention #2 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Julia T Hoffman, MSN | Contact | 402-552-3077 | outcomesresearch@unmc.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Peter Pellegrino, MD | University of Nebraska | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| University of Nebraska Medical Center | Recruiting | Omaha | Nebraska | 68198 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33818600 | Background | Petersen EA, Stauss TG, Scowcroft JA, Brooks ES, White JL, Sills SM, Amirdelfan K, Guirguis MN, Xu J, Yu C, Nairizi A, Patterson DG, Tsoulfas KC, Creamer MJ, Galan V, Bundschu RH, Paul CA, Mehta ND, Choi H, Sayed D, Lad SP, DiBenedetto DJ, Sethi KA, Goree JH, Bennett MT, Harrison NJ, Israel AF, Chang P, Wu PW, Gekht G, Argoff CE, Nasr CE, Taylor RS, Subbaroyan J, Gliner BE, Caraway DL, Mekhail NA. Effect of High-frequency (10-kHz) Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2021 Jun 1;78(6):687-698. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0538. | |
| 32829663 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
1:1 cross over design
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Sham stimulation |
| Device |
Sham stimulation |
|
| High-frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation Effect on Blood Flow | Changes in blood flow from high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (SCS) will measure lower extremity capillary digit blood flow flow by laser speckle imaging. | Baseline, 12 week follow up after permanent spinal cord simulator, week 14 intervention #1 , week 16 intervention #2 |
| High-frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation Effect on Autonomic Control | Changes in autonomic control from high-frequency spinal cord stimulation (SCS) will measure sympathetic vasomotion by volume-clamp method on digits of the hand and laser speckle imaging on the lower extremities. | Baseline, 12 week follow-up after permanent spinal cord simulator, week 14 intervention #1 , week 16 intervention #2 |
| Background |
| Pellegrino PR, Zucker IH, Chatzizisis YS, Wang HJ, Schiller AM. Quantification of Renal Sympathetic Vasomotion as a Novel End Point for Renal Denervation. Hypertension. 2020 Oct;76(4):1247-1255. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15325. Epub 2020 Aug 24. |
| 29608229 | Background | Al-Kaisy A, Palmisani S, Pang D, Sanderson K, Wesley S, Tan Y, McCammon S, Trescott A. Prospective, Randomized, Sham-Control, Double Blind, Crossover Trial of Subthreshold Spinal Cord Stimulation at Various Kilohertz Frequencies in Subjects Suffering From Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (SCS Frequency Study). Neuromodulation. 2018 Jul;21(5):457-465. doi: 10.1111/ner.12771. Epub 2018 Apr 2. |
| 38165292 | Background | Kretzschmar M, Okaro U, Schwarz M, Reining M, Lesser T. Spinal Neuromodulation for Peripheral Arterial Disease of Lower Extremities: A Ten-Year Retrospective Analysis. Neuromodulation. 2024 Oct;27(7):1240-1250. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2023.10.186. Epub 2024 Jan 1. |
| 36598544 | Background | Piedade GS, Vesper J, Reichstein D, Dauphin AK, Damirchi S. Spinal cord stimulation in non-reconstructable critical limb ischemia: a retrospective study of 71 cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2023 Apr;165(4):967-973. doi: 10.1007/s00701-022-05448-8. Epub 2023 Jan 4. |
| 30802587 | Background | Klinkova A, Kamenskaya O, Ashurkov A, Murtazin V, Orlov K, Lomivorotov VV, Karaskov A. The Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia One Year after Spinal Cord Stimulation. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 Jan;62:356-364. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.12.093. Epub 2019 Feb 22. |
| 24262897 | Background | Deogaonkar M, Zibly Z, Slavin KV. Spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of vascular pathology. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2014 Jan;25(1):25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2013.08.013. Epub 2013 Oct 5. |
| 10853681 | Background | Petrakis E, Sciacca V. Prospective study of transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcPO2) measurement in the testing period of spinal cord stimulation in diabetic patients with critical lower limb ischaemia. Int Angiol. 2000 Mar;19(1):18-25. |
| 33549777 | Background | Chapman KB, Kloosterman J, Schor JA, Girardi GE, van Helmond N, Yousef TA. Objective Improvements in Peripheral Arterial Disease from Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation: A Case Series. Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Jul;74:519.e7-519.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.01.069. Epub 2021 Feb 4. |
| 24712687 | Background | De Caridi G, Massara M, David A, Giardina M, La Spada M, Stilo F, Spinelli F, Grande R, Butrico L, de Franciscis S, Serra R. Spinal cord stimulation to achieve wound healing in a primary lower limb critical ischaemia referral centre. Int Wound J. 2016 Apr;13(2):220-5. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12272. Epub 2014 Apr 8. |
| 35466931 | Background | Cucuruz B, Kopp R, Hampe-Hecht H, Andercou O, Schierling W, Pfister K, Koller M, Noppeney T. Treatment of end-stage peripheral artery disease by neuromodulation. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2022;81(4):315-324. doi: 10.3233/CH-221436. |
| 33550918 | Background | Cyrek AE, Henn N, Meinhardt F, Lainka M, Pacha A, Paul A, Koch D. Improving Limb Salvage for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia With Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Retrospective Analysis. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2021 May;55(4):367-373. doi: 10.1177/1538574420985765. Epub 2021 Feb 8. |
| 10713199 | Background | Petrakis IE, Sciacca V. Does autonomic neuropathy influence spinal cord stimulation therapy success in diabetic patients with critical lower limb ischemia? Surg Neurol. 2000 Feb;53(2):182-8; discussion 188-9. doi: 10.1016/s0090-3019(99)00182-2. |
| 36617410 | Background | Kilchukov M, Kiselev R, Gorbatykh A, Klinkova A, Murtazin V, Kamenskaya O, Orlov K. High-Frequency versus Low-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation in Treatment of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: Short-Term Results of a Randomized Trial. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2023;101(1):1-11. doi: 10.1159/000527309. Epub 2023 Jan 6. |
| 26409842 | Background | Abu Dabrh AM, Steffen MW, Asi N, Undavalli C, Wang Z, Elamin MB, Conte MS, Murad MH. Nonrevascularization-based treatments in patients with severe or critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2015 Nov;62(5):1330-9.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.07.069. Epub 2015 Sep 26. |
| 10765005 | Background | Petrakis IE, Sciacca V. Epidural spinal cord electrical stimulation in diabetic critical lower limb ischemia. J Diabetes Complications. 1999 Sep-Dec;13(5-6):293-9. doi: 10.1016/s1056-8727(99)00061-6. |
| 8424581 | Background | Mingoli A, Sciacca V, Tamorri M, Fiume D, Sapienza P. Clinical results of epidural spinal cord electrical stimulation in patients affected with limb-threatening chronic arterial obstructive disease. Angiology. 1993 Jan;44(1):21-5. doi: 10.1177/000331979304400104. |
| 17691384 | Background | Vincenzo S, Kyventidis T. Epidural spinal cord stimulation in lower limb ischemia. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2007;97(Pt 1):253-8. doi: 10.1007/978-3-211-33079-1_34. |
| 8751312 | Background | Myklebust JB, Cusick JF, Boerboom LE, Prieto TE, Khan TA. Vascular effects of spinal cord stimulation in the monkey. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 1995;64(1):32-9. doi: 10.1159/000098731. |
| 22151190 | Background | Tedesco A, D'Addato M. Spinal cord stimulation for patients with critical limb ischemia: immediate and long-term clinical outcome from the prospective italian register. Neuromodulation. 2004 Apr;7(2):97-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1094-7159.2004.04013.x. |
| 7811584 | Background | Horsch S, Claeys L. Epidural spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of severe peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Ann Vasc Surg. 1994 Sep;8(5):468-74. doi: 10.1007/BF02133067. |
| 3484519 | Background | Broseta J, Barbera J, de Vera JA, Barcia-Salorio JL, Garcia-March G, Gonzalez-Darder J, Rovaina F, Joanes V. Spinal cord stimulation in peripheral arterial disease. A cooperative study. J Neurosurg. 1986 Jan;64(1):71-80. doi: 10.3171/jns.1986.64.1.0071. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D058729 | Peripheral Arterial Disease |
| D003929 | Diabetic Neuropathies |
| D003924 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 |
| D059350 | Chronic Pain |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D050197 | Atherosclerosis |
| D001161 | Arteriosclerosis |
| D001157 | Arterial Occlusive Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D016491 | Peripheral Vascular Diseases |
| D010523 | Peripheral Nervous System Diseases |
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D048909 | Diabetes Complications |
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D062187 | Spinal Cord Stimulation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004599 | Electric Stimulation Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D026741 | Physical Therapy Modalities |
| D012046 | Rehabilitation |
Not provided
Not provided