Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-A02322-43 | Other Identifier | ID RCB |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| University of Burgundy | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Recent evidence suggests that cognitive systems do not operate in isolation but interact within broader networks, thus opening new avenues for fundamental and clinical research. An illustrative example is the interaction between language comprehension and motor representations. For instance, motor training (e.g., sports, origami training) can facilitate action verb recognition, whereas motor deficits (e.g., upper limb immobilization) can hinder the processing of action language. Similarly, action language has been shown to affect motor performance. These effects are attributed to an implicit form of motor imagery, an automatic simulation of motor experience (without actual movement) evoked by action words. Interestingly, literature supports the idea that the motor simulations used for imagining an action are also engaged during the reading of action language, leading to similar neurophysiological and behavioral changes in both processes. However, questions remain about the similarity of the simulations generated by motor imagery and action language. This project, encompassing three experimental sequences, aims to address these questions to achieve significant scientific advancements in both theoretical and applied domains.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| TMS Experimental group |
| ||
| fMRI Experimental group |
| ||
| Experimental ccPAS group |
| ||
| Sham ccPAS group |
| ||
| control group |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motor imagery | Other | Participants were asked to imagine arm or foot movements. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Level of corticospinal excitability | this is a physiological response obtained by transcranial magnetic pulses (TMS). This is an indicator of the excitability of the motor system, which can be used at rest or during various cognitive tasks (motor imagery or action reading). | 1 hour and 30 minutes |
| Cortical activation (BOLD signal) | this is a cortical response obtained via a fMRI. This is an indicator of the brain activity, which can be used at rest or during motor and cognitive tasks (motor imagery or action reading). | 1 hour |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects will be aged between 18 and 40, reading and understanding French, with no neurological or psychiatric disorders, no uncorrected vision deficits, and meeting all MRI or TMS examination criteria. they were recruited at the University of Burgundy (TMS measures only) and the University of Grenoble Alpes (fMRI measures only).
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laurent VERCUEIL | Contact | 0476765561 | LVercueil@chu-grenoble.fr | |
| William DUPONT | Contact | +33 (0)6 67 76 00 99 | william.dupont@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Laurent VERCUEIL | CHU Grenoble Alpes | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHU Grenoble Alpes | Recruiting | Grenoble | Grenob | 38043 | France |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Action reading | Other | Participants were asked to read sentences involving arm or foot movements |
|
| Motor localizer | Other | Participants were asked to perform arm or foot movements |
|
| Université de Bourgogne | Recruiting | Dijon | France |
|