Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1R01CA251792-01A1 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Cancer Institute (NCI) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To determine the risk of solitary elective volume recurrence following involved nodal radiotherapy (INRT) versus elective nodal irradiation (ENI)
Patients are assigned to either elective nodal irradiation (ENI), the current treatment paradigm, or involved nodal radiotherapy (INRT), the experimental treatment. INRT is more specifically targeting potentially cancerous nodes, identified using an AI program developed in-house. The hope is that this more specific targeting will decrease healthy tissue being irradiated, therefore decreasing potential side effects of the radiation treatment.
Patients are blinded during study participation.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard radiotherapy with elective neck irradiation (ENI) | Active Comparator | The elective neck dose is 56 Gy in 35 fractions Lymph nodes measuring 17 mm or greater in any dimension, or showing FDG above adjacent blood pool, may receive 63 Gy in 35 fractions per physician discretion.The elective neck field is determined by the primary site. The Oropharynx: Node-positive side: Levels IB-V and RP nodes Node-negative side: Levels II-IV, RP at discretion of physician For ipsilateral tonsil decision-making, see 4.1.1.6.3 The Larynx: Node-positive side: Levels IB-V Node-negative side: Levels II-IV Subglottic extension: Level VI Hypopharynx: Node-positive side: Levels IB-V and RP nodes Node-negative side: Levels II-V and RP nodes Pyriform sinus involvement: Level VI |
|
| Involved and suspicious lymph node delineation and targeting | Experimental | After the involved and suspicious nodes are contoured, the physician will contour remaining nodes that are present on more than one CT slice and submit them to the AI-Radiomics module for assessment.The nodal gross tumor volume (GTVn, GTVns and GTVnps for involved, suspicious nodes or potentially suspicious) will be contoured on the planning CT, using radiographic and clinical information to define its extent. The total dose for GTVns is 63 Gy in 35 fractions, and the total dose for GTVnps is 56 Gy in 35 fractions. For lymph nodes identified as potentially suspicious by the AI- Radiomics module that are outside of the expected primary draining zone, physicians may not treat the lymph node if the module assesses its estimation uncertainty as greater than 50%. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ENI using IMRT with or without chemotherapy | Drug | This study is a phase II single-blinded randomized trial comparing standard ENI with involved nodal radiotherapy. INRT using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with or without chemotherapy (if given, either cisplatin, cetuximab, or carboplatin- paclitaxel) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The probability at two years: SEVR in INRT versus ENI patients | The probability at two years will be compared between the arms using a one- sided Fisher's exact test (probability of SEVR between the arms). | 2 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Incidence of Acute Grade 2+ Dermatitis between ENI vs INRT arms | Comparison of instances of grade 2+ acute dermatitis between patients treated with INRT (involved nodal radiotherapy, study treatment) vs ENI (elective nodal irradiation, standard of care). This will be compared between the arms using a Fisher exact test (2-sided). | Start of RT through 90 days post RT |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarah Neufeld | Contact | 214-645-8525 | Sarah.hardee@utsouthwestern.edu | |
| Liliana Robles | Contact | 214-645-8525 | liliana.robles@utsouthwestern.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| David Sher, MD | University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| UT Southwestern Medical Center | Recruiting | Dallas | Texas | 75390 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42116021 | Derived | Young S, Moon DH, Wang J, Chen L, Lin MH, Zhu L, Ahn C, Hughes R, Sher DJ. Involved nodal versus elective neck radiotherapy (INVERT) for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective phase II randomized controlled trial protocol. BMC Cancer. 2026 May 11;26(1):815. doi: 10.1186/s12885-026-15904-8. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006258 | Head and Neck Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004358 | Drug Therapy |
| D002945 | Cisplatin |
| D000068818 | Cetuximab |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D017606 | Chlorine Compounds |
| D007287 | Inorganic Chemicals |
| D017672 | Nitrogen Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
radiation ENI versus INRT
Not provided
Not provided
Patients are blinded to their treatment.
|
|
| INRT | Radiation | INRT using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with or without chemotherapy (if given, either cisplatin, cetuximab, or carboplatin- paclitaxel) |
|
| ENI | Radiation | ENI using IMRT with or without chemotherapy |
|
| Incidence of Grade 3+ Dysphagia between ENI vs INRT arms | Comparison of instances of grade 3+ dysphagia between patients treated with INRT (involved nodal radiotherapy, study treatment) vs ENI (elective nodal irradiation, standard of care). This will be compared between the arms using a Fisher exact test (2-sided). | 2 years post RT |
| MDADI Quality of Life composite score | Comparison of MDADI composite scores at 2 years post RT between patients treated with INRT (involved nodal radiotherapy, study treatment) vs ENI (elective nodal irradiation, standard of care). Patients with disease recurrence will be excluded from analysis. At two years, both scores will be compared between the arms using a two-sided T test. | 2 years post RT |
| D017671 |
| Platinum Compounds |
| D061067 | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized |
| D000911 | Antibodies, Monoclonal |
| D000906 | Antibodies |
| D007136 | Immunoglobulins |
| D007162 | Immunoproteins |
| D001798 | Blood Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D012712 | Serum Globulins |
| D005916 | Globulins |