Characterization and Contribution of Genome-wide DNA Methylation (DNA Methylation Episignatures) in Rare Diseases With Prenatal Onset
Characterization and Contribution of Genome-wide DNA Methylation (DNA Methylation Episignatures) in Rare Diseases With Prenatal Onset
It is necessary to define reference DNA Methylation Episignatures from fetal DNA. The hypotheses are:
Congenital anomalies (CA) complicate 3 to 5% of pregnancies and may be associated with genetic disorders. Diagnosis of genetic diseases is a major medical challenge, especially during pregnancy.
Over the past two decades, next-generation sequencing (NGS) has revolutionized our ability to identify the genetic condition associated with CA. During pregnancy, prenatal exome sequencing identified an additional diagnosis in around 30% of fetuses with CA when standard chromosomal investigations (karyotype and chromosomal microarray analysis, CMA) fail to provide a diagnosis.
Despite these major advances, around 40% of rare diseases remain unsolved, including 10-15% of patients harboring variants of uncertain significance (VUS).
After birth, additional functional analyses ("multi-OMICS"), including genome-wide DNA methylation studies, may be offered to reclassify VUS.
DNA methylation anomalies play an important role in pathologies (developmental disorders and oncology).
DNA methylation Episignatures, defined as the cumulative DNA methylation patterns occurring at multiple CpG dinucleotides across the genome, have been recognized to be intricately associated with many human traits, including age, sex, and disease status. Recently, DNA Methylation Episignatures have been identified in the blood of children or adults for several well-characterized genetic diseases. However, these postnatal DNA Methylation Episignatures cannot be used during pregnancy, because DNA methylation changes from one tissue to another and during time, especially during fetal developpement. In addition, the tissues available during pregnancy are different from those analyzed postnatally (blood).
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient Inclusion Criteria:
Negative Controls :
For everyone:
• For living participants: Non-objection by holders of parental authority to the reuse of clinical data and biological samples collected and stored in the context of care (consent of care).
• For deceased participants:
Consent of the holders of parental authority to the use of the samples kept for research purposes, signed as part of the treatment
No mention of opposition to the reuse of clinical data from the treatment in the patient's medical record
Exclusion Criteria:
nicolas.bourgon@aphp.fr+33 1 42 19 27 96
nelly.briand@aphp.fr0144381862