Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Technion, Israel Institute of Technology | OTHER |
| Centro Nacional de Análisis Genómico | UNKNOWN |
| Vicomtech | UNKNOWN |
| University of Latvia |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
LUCIA aims to develop prediction models for the early diagnosis of lung cancer based on the identification of risk factors and deeper cellular knowledge, by recording real-world data; with risk assessment tools, non-invasive devices and omics analysis. These models will enable new clinical pathways and diagnostic workflow to be implemented to ensure early diagnosis and confirmation, including classification of lung cancer subtype.
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, causing more deaths than breast and prostate cancer combined.
The current five-year survival rate after diagnosis of all types of lung cancer in Europe is 13% (11.2% for men and 13.9% for women). The five-year survival rate for some types of lung cancer ranges from 6% to 7% (small cell LC) and 23% to 28% for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Currently there are important deficiencies when it comes to achieving an adequate lung cancer screening program. According to principles established in 1968, a screening program should be based on pathology that can be improved through the use of population screening.
The evidence suggests two important gaps in early detection. On the one hand, the identification of risk factors beyond smoking and age. And on the other hand, the only tool for early detection that has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in lung cancer is chest CT, a test that may not be sustainable in the long term for many healthcare systems. In parallel, lung cancer diagnoses among never smokers and reduced smokers are increasing rapidly, suggesting that if lung cancer screening research continues focusing only on the heaviest smokers, a gap will persist between the population that performs the test and the population that suffers from the disease.
Evidence also suggests that people undergoing screening are not being optimally referred for follow-up or kept engaged in long-term screening.
Currently there are important deficiencies when it comes to achieving an adequate lung cancer screening program. The incidence in individuals without a history of smoking is increasingly higher. Therefore, an observational, longitudinal, multicenter cohort analytical study will be conducted to determine eligibility for screening based on individualized risk (based on age, a more detailed smoking history, occupational exposure, and other risk factors such as ethnicity and family history of lung cancer) and the development and validation of lung cancer risk predictive models that can improve screening efficiency and reduce lung cancer morbidity and mortality.
These models will allow new clinical pathways and diagnostic workflow to be implemented to ensure rapid diagnosis and confirmation, including lung cancer subtype classification.
The study consists of collecting data from participants in 4 visits over two years. During each visit, the clinical evaluation will be carried out, which will consist of the collection of sociodemographic data and clinical history, physical examination, concomitant medication, collection of exposure data and guide symptoms, Quality of Life questionnaires and geolocation. In addition, the following tests will be performed: low-dose computed tomography (LDCT), blood tests, genomic analysis and tests with new non-invasive devices (spectrometry on card (SPOC), breath analyzer (BAN) and broad-spectrum biomarker sensor patch (WBSP)). With all this, the aim is to develop and validate new tests based on new non-invasive and easy-to-use technologies that allow for the implementation of more efficient, acceptable and equitable population screening programs in the near future.
The completion of this project will allow to provide data that can be used to better understand and discover new risk factors for suffering from lung cancer and therefore improve the management of the disease.
Furthermore, this study will favor the reduction of long-term morbidity and mortality from lung cancer and will allow the future implementation of a lung cancer program.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Study population | Adult subjects (40 years old or higher), smokers and non-smokers, both women and men who have the capacity to comply with the study follow-up and sign the informed consent, will be recruited from "Servicio Andaluz de Salud" (SAS), "Osakidetza Servicio Vasco de Salud" (OSA), "Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège" (CHUL) and "Centre for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (CTLD) of Riga East University Hospital (REUH)". |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| presence of pulmonary nodules | The main variable is the presence of pulmonary nodules identified by Low Dose Computerized Tomography (LDCT) | 2 years |
| Lung Cancer diagnosis | The main variable is the presence of Lung Cancer diagnosis identified by Low Dose Computerized Tomography (LDCT). | 2 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Age | years | 2 years |
| Gender | Male/female | 2 years |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria (for the 3 phases):
Inclusion criteria for Phase 2: Precision Screening:
Inclusion criteria for Phase 3: Diagnosis:
- Patients diagnosed with indeterminate pulmonary nodules or Lung Cancer from the screening phases.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Adult subjects (40 years old or higher), smokers and non-smokers, both women and men who have the capacity to comply with the study follow-up and sign the informed consent, will be recruited from "Servicio Andaluz de Salud" (SAS), "Osakidetza Servicio Vasco de Salud" (OSA), "Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège" (CHUL) and "Centre for Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (CTLD) of Riga East University Hospital (REUH)".
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eunate Arana-Arri, PhD | Contact | +34 944881593 | 841593 | eunate.aranaarri@osakidetza.eus |
| Jon E Idoyaga-Uribarrena, MPhar | Contact | +34 944881593 | 841593 | joneneko.idoyagauribarrena@bio-bizkaia.eus |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Luis G Luque-Romero, MD | Andaluz Health Service | Principal Investigator |
| David Vicente-Baz, MD | Andaluz Health Service | Principal Investigator |
| Alvils Krams, MD |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège | Liège | Wallonia | 4000 | Belgium |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 34164288 | Background | van Meerbeeck JP, Franck C. Lung cancer screening in Europe: where are we in 2021? Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 May;10(5):2407-2417. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-890. | |
| 33046839 | Background | Oudkerk M, Liu S, Heuvelmans MA, Walter JE, Field JK. Lung cancer LDCT screening and mortality reduction - evidence, pitfalls and future perspectives. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021 Mar;18(3):135-151. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-00432-6. Epub 2020 Oct 12. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Lung Cancer Survival Rates | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008175 | Lung Neoplasms |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012142 | Respiratory Tract Neoplasms |
| D013899 | Thoracic Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
| OTHER |
| Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege | OTHER |
| Andaluz Health Service | OTHER_GOV |
| Nanose Medical Ltd. | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Blood samples for DNA extraction
| Ethnicity |
description of the ethnia |
| 2 years |
| Socioeconomic factors | deprivation index | 2 years |
| Education level | description of the education level | 2 years |
| height | meter | 2 years |
| weight | kilograms | 2 years |
| Body Mass Index | kg/m^2 | 2 years |
| Blood pressure | Systolic and diastolic blood pressure in mmHg | 2 years |
| heart rate | beats/min | 2 years |
| respiratory rate | breaths/min | 2 years |
| Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) classification | only for COPD patient classification. Grade: GOLD 1 to 4 (from GOLD 1 which means mild stage of COPD to GOLD 4 very severe stage of COPD) Exacerbation history: GOLD A, B or E (depending on exacerbations: Gold A id 0 or 1 moderate exacerbations (not leading to hospitalization) with mMRC 0-1 CAT<10; GOLD B if 0 or 1 moderate exacerbations (not leading to hospitalization) with mMRC >= 2 CAT >=10 and GOLD E if 2 or more moderate exacerbations or 1 or more leading to hospitalization) with mMRC 0-1 CAT<10. | 2 years |
| Medical record | Family history of lung cancer or other types of cancer, emphysema/ COPD (+ GOLD classification)/ asthma, Interstitial Lung Disease (interstitial patterns), bronchiectasis, arterial hypertension, dyslipidemia, previous acute myocardial infarction, vasculopathies and chronic treatment. | 2 years |
| Exposure to harmful agents | Smoking and occupational exposure (physical activity and frequency, alcohol intake, cigarette packets/year, age of smoking onset, time elapsed since last cigarette, occupational exposure to carcinogens). | 2 years |
| Exploratory Omics markers | Dedicated blood samples will be specifically performed for a large Omics analysis. | baseline |
| HEALTH-PROMOTING LIFESTYLE PROFILE II questionnaire (HPLP II) | A score for overall health-promoting lifestyle is obtained by calculating a mean of the individual's responses to all 52 items; six subscale scores are obtained similarly by calculating a mean of the responses to subscale items. The use of means rather than sums of scale items is recommended to retain the 1 to 4 metric of item responses and to allow meaningful comparisons of scores across subscales. Lower scores (1) mean lower engage in a health-promoting lifestyle Higher scores (4) mean higher engage in a health-promoting lifestyle | 2 years |
| Fantastic lifestyle Checklist | Evaluation of the population lifestyle: 85-100 points --> Excellent 70-84 points --> Very good 55-69 points --> Good 35-54 points --> Fair 0-34 points --> needs improvement | 2 years |
| Mediterranean diet adherence questionnaire | 0-14 points scale <9 points --> low adherence to Mediterranean diet >9 points --> High adherence to Mediterranean diet | 2 years |
| EuroQoL-5D-5L questionnaire | Scoring from 0-100 points. 0 points low quality of life 100 high quality of life | 2 years |
| The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) questionnaire | Scoring from 0-40 points >8 points --> indicators of hazardous and harmful alcohol use 8-15 points --> simple advice focused on the reduction of hazardous drinking 16-19 points --> brief counseling and continued monitoring >20 points --> warrant further diagnostic evaluationfor alcohol dependence | 2 years |
| Breath Analyzer (BAN) device | Measurement of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) of a breath sample for Lung Cancer early detection | 2 years |
| Wide-biomarker-spectrum Multi-Use Sensing Patch (WBSP) | Measurement of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) in the sweat and skin headspace for Lung Cancer early detection | 2 years |
| Spectrometry-on-Card (SPOC) | Measurement of biomarkers and signals from a blood sample for the early detection of lung cancer | 2 years |
| Tumor pathology | Tumor biopsy will be carried out in order to classify and characterize it regarding its size and location. | 2 years |
| Lung CT scan description | A lungCT scan will be performed to. Lung nodules and other findings (if any) will be reported in order to diagnose a lung cancer. If no anomalies are found, it will also be reported. | 2 years |
| Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) | mL, %, Lower limit of Normal and z-score | 2 years |
| Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) | mL, %, Lower limit of Normal and z-score | 2 years |
| FEV1/FVC ratio | percentage (%) | 2 years |
| Glucose | mg/dL | baseline |
| HDL Cholesterol | mg/dL | baseline |
| Iron | μg/dL | baseline |
| C reactive protein | mg/L | baseline |
| Proteins | g/dL | baseline |
| Albumin | g/dL | baseline |
| LDL Cholesterol | mg/dL | baseline |
| Ferritin | ng/mL | baseline |
| Chloride | mEq/L | baseline |
| Lactate dehydrogenase | U/L | baseline |
| Triglycerides | mg/dL | baseline |
| Transferrin Index | index | baseline |
| Cholesterol | mg/dL | baseline |
| transferrin | mg/dL | baseline |
| phosphate | mg/dL | baseline |
| calcium | mg/dL | baseline |
| GOT | U/L | baseline |
| GPT | U/L | baseline |
| GGT | U/L | baseline |
| Bilirubin | mg/dL | baseline |
| Alkaline phosphatase | U/L | baseline |
| urea | mg/dL | baseline |
| Creatinine | mg/dL | baseline |
| Sodium | mEq/L | baseline |
| potassium | mEq/L | baseline |
| Urate | mg/dL | baseline |
| carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) | ng/mL | baseline |
| CA 125 | U/mL | baseline |
| CYFRA 21.1 | ng/mL | baseline |
| Neuronal specific enolase (NSE) | ng/mL | baseline |
| Complete blood count | number of blood cells, composition and percentage | baseline |
| erythrocyte sedimentation rate | mm/h | baseline |
| partial thromboplastin time | seg | baseline |
| fibrinogen | mg/dL | baseline |
| international normalized ratio (INR) | ratio | baseline |
| prothrombin time | seg | baseline |
| Geo location | Participant's census tract identification (one for home address and one for workplace address) | 2 years |
| University of Latvia |
| Principal Investigator |
| Julien Guiot, MD | Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liege | Principal Investigator |
| Riga East University Hospital | Riga | LV-1038 | Latvia |
|
| Hospital Universitario Cruces | Barakaldo | Viscay | 48903 | Spain |
|
| Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena | Seville | 41009 | Spain |
|
| Aljarafe-Sevilla Norte Health District | Seville | Spain |
|
| 36563698 | Background | Adams SJ, Stone E, Baldwin DR, Vliegenthart R, Lee P, Fintelmann FJ. Lung cancer screening. Lancet. 2023 Feb 4;401(10374):390-408. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01694-4. Epub 2022 Dec 20. |
| 34406177 | Background | Gomez-Carballo N, Fernandez-Soberon S, Rejas-Gutierrez J. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a lung cancer screening programme in Spain. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2022 May 1;31(3):235-244. doi: 10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000700. |
| 33911981 | Background | Thandra KC, Barsouk A, Saginala K, Aluru JS, Barsouk A. Epidemiology of lung cancer. Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2021;25(1):45-52. doi: 10.5114/wo.2021.103829. Epub 2021 Feb 23. |
| 31575553 | Background | Schabath MB, Cote ML. Cancer Progress and Priorities: Lung Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Oct;28(10):1563-1579. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0221. |
| 34493867 | Background | Zhang T, Joubert P, Ansari-Pour N, Zhao W, Hoang PH, Lokanga R, Moye AL, Rosenbaum J, Gonzalez-Perez A, Martinez-Jimenez F, Castro A, Muscarella LA, Hofman P, Consonni D, Pesatori AC, Kebede M, Li M, Gould Rothberg BE, Peneva I, Schabath MB, Poeta ML, Costantini M, Hirsch D, Heselmeyer-Haddad K, Hutchinson A, Olanich M, Lawrence SM, Lenz P, Duggan M, Bhawsar PMS, Sang J, Kim J, Mendoza L, Saini N, Klimczak LJ, Islam SMA, Otlu B, Khandekar A, Cole N, Stewart DR, Choi J, Brown KM, Caporaso NE, Wilson SH, Pommier Y, Lan Q, Rothman N, Almeida JS, Carter H, Ried T, Kim CF, Lopez-Bigas N, Garcia-Closas M, Shi J, Bosse Y, Zhu B, Gordenin DA, Alexandrov LB, Chanock SJ, Wedge DC, Landi MT. Genomic and evolutionary classification of lung cancer in never smokers. Nat Genet. 2021 Sep;53(9):1348-1359. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00920-0. Epub 2021 Sep 6. |
| 35402145 | Background | Ramaswamy A. Lung Cancer Screening: Review and 2021 Update. Curr Pulmonol Rep. 2022;11(1):15-28. doi: 10.1007/s13665-021-00283-1. Epub 2022 Apr 2. |
| 33783822 | Background | Ten Haaf K, van der Aalst CM, de Koning HJ, Kaaks R, Tammemagi MC. Personalising lung cancer screening: An overview of risk-stratification opportunities and challenges. Int J Cancer. 2021 Jul 15;149(2):250-263. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33578. Epub 2021 May 3. |
| 33227525 | Background | Berghmans T, Lievens Y, Aapro M, Baird AM, Beishon M, Calabrese F, Degi C, Delgado Bolton RC, Gaga M, Lovey J, Luciani A, Pereira P, Prosch H, Saar M, Shackcloth M, Tabak-Houwaard G, Costa A, Poortmans P. European Cancer Organisation Essential Requirements for Quality Cancer Care (ERQCC): Lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2020 Dec;150:221-239. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.08.017. Epub 2020 Sep 4. |
| 26297204 | Background | Lemjabbar-Alaoui H, Hassan OU, Yang YW, Buchanan P. Lung cancer: Biology and treatment options. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015 Dec;1856(2):189-210. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Aug 19. |
| 30955514 | Background | Nasim F, Sabath BF, Eapen GA. Lung Cancer. Med Clin North Am. 2019 May;103(3):463-473. doi: 10.1016/j.mcna.2018.12.006. |
| 34445366 | Background | Nooreldeen R, Bach H. Current and Future Development in Lung Cancer Diagnosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Aug 12;22(16):8661. doi: 10.3390/ijms22168661. |
| 36409492 | Background | Liu Y, Pan IE, Tak HJ, Vlahos I, Volk R, Shih YT. Assessment of Uptake Appropriateness of Computed Tomography for Lung Cancer Screening According to Patients Meeting Eligibility Criteria of the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2243163. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.43163. |
| 36409500 | Background | Braithwaite D, Gould MK. Is Lung Cancer Screening Reaching the People Who Are Most Likely to Benefit? JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2243171. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.43171. No abstract available. |
| 28376113 | Background | Ten Haaf K, Jeon J, Tammemagi MC, Han SS, Kong CY, Plevritis SK, Feuer EJ, de Koning HJ, Steyerberg EW, Meza R. Risk prediction models for selection of lung cancer screening candidates: A retrospective validation study. PLoS Med. 2017 Apr 4;14(4):e1002277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002277. eCollection 2017 Apr. |
| 33823116 | Background | Gould MK, Huang BZ, Tammemagi MC, Kinar Y, Shiff R. Machine Learning for Early Lung Cancer Identification Using Routine Clinical and Laboratory Data. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Aug 15;204(4):445-453. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202007-2791OC. |
| 34342588 | Background | Yeh MC, Wang YH, Yang HC, Bai KJ, Wang HH, Li YJ. Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Lung Cancer Risk Using Nonimaging Electronic Medical Records: Deep Learning Approach. J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 3;23(8):e26256. doi: 10.2196/26256. |
| 31995683 | Background | de Koning HJ, van der Aalst CM, de Jong PA, Scholten ET, Nackaerts K, Heuvelmans MA, Lammers JJ, Weenink C, Yousaf-Khan U, Horeweg N, van 't Westeinde S, Prokop M, Mali WP, Mohamed Hoesein FAA, van Ooijen PMA, Aerts JGJV, den Bakker MA, Thunnissen E, Verschakelen J, Vliegenthart R, Walter JE, Ten Haaf K, Groen HJM, Oudkerk M. Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Volume CT Screening in a Randomized Trial. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 6;382(6):503-513. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911793. Epub 2020 Jan 29. |
| 33687470 | Background | US Preventive Services Task Force; Krist AH, Davidson KW, Mangione CM, Barry MJ, Cabana M, Caughey AB, Davis EM, Donahue KE, Doubeni CA, Kubik M, Landefeld CS, Li L, Ogedegbe G, Owens DK, Pbert L, Silverstein M, Stevermer J, Tseng CW, Wong JB. Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2021 Mar 9;325(10):962-970. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.1117. |
| 34727513 | Background | Triplette M, Wenger DS, Shahrir S, Kross EK, Kava C, Phipps A, Hawes SE, Cole A, Snidarich M, Crothers K. Patient Identification of Lung Cancer Screening Follow-Up Recommendations and the Association with Adherence. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 May;19(5):799-806. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202107-887OC. |
| 34624528 | Background | Lin Y, Fu M, Ding R, Inoue K, Jeon CY, Hsu W, Aberle DR, Prosper AE. Patient Adherence to Lung CT Screening Reporting & Data System-Recommended Screening Intervals in the United States: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Thorac Oncol. 2022 Jan;17(1):38-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2021.09.013. Epub 2021 Oct 6. |
| 26667338 | Background | Rivera GA, Wakelee H. Lung Cancer in Never Smokers. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;893:43-57. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-24223-1_3. |
| 35471946 | Background | Smith RJ, Vijayaharan T, Linehan V, Sun Z, Ein Yong JH, Harris S, Mariathas HH, Bhatia R. Efficacy of Risk Prediction Models and Thresholds to Select Patients for Lung Cancer Screening. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2022 Nov;73(4):672-679. doi: 10.1177/08465371221089899. Epub 2022 Apr 26. |
| 30821827 | Background | Tammemagi MC, Ten Haaf K, Toumazis I, Kong CY, Han SS, Jeon J, Commins J, Riley T, Meza R. Development and Validation of a Multivariable Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model That Includes Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening Results: A Secondary Analysis of Data From the National Lung Screening Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190204. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0204. |
| 42082236 | Derived | Idoyaga-Uribarrena JE, Garcia-Echeberria L, Lecumberri I, Azkona E, Jimenez U, Sainz-Camin M, Nunez-Benjumea FJ, Luque-Romero LG, Ernst B, Guiot J, Stonans I, Krams A, Macia I, Garin-Muga A, Gut IG, Gut M, Orcajo-Lago J, Arana-Arri E; LUCIA Study Group members. TECHNION - Israel Institute of Technology (TECH-Israel). Understanding LUng Cancer risk factors and their Impact Assessment (LUCIA): protocol for multicentre observational cohort study. BMJ Open. 2026 May 4;16(5):e116423. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-116423. |
| GLOBOCAN 2020: Estimated cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2020 | View source |
| Proposal for a Council Recommendation on strengthening prevention through early detection: A new EU approach on cancer screening replacing Council Recommendation 2003/878/EC | View source |
| D008171 |
| Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |