Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this post marketing study is to verify clincal performance and safety of CE-marked device Juläine.
The main objective is to evaluate device performance when used as intended for augmentation of shallow to deep nasolabial folds.
Participants will:
Receive 3 rounds of treatment and will be followed up for a total of 2 years.
The goal of this post marketing study is to verify clincal performance and safety of CE-marked device Juläine.
The main objective is to evaluate device performance when used as intended for augmentation of shallow to deep nasolabial folds.
Participants will:
Receive 3 rounds of treatment and will be followed up for a total of 2 years.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Juläine | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juläine | Device | Dermal filler (PLLA) |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Improvement on Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) of at least 1 grade. | Average improvement of at least 1 grade on the WSRS of the combined left and right NLF score. Score 1-5, Higher scores are a worse outcome. | 12 months after final injection |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of subjects with improvement of at least 1 grade on the WSRS. | Percentage of subjects with an improvement of at least 1 grade on the WSRS of the left and right (mean of the two) NLF at 3, 6 and 24 months after final injection compared to baseline (investigator assessment at all visits, blinded assessment at 12 months). | Up to 24 months after final injection |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ribé clinic | Barcelona | Spain | ||||
| The Faculty |
The IPD will not be shared due to the proprietary nature of the product under investigation, which is already commercialized. Sharing participant-level data could compromise competitive advantage and intellectual property, and therefore is not aligned with the sponsor's strategic interests.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Change in WSRS score | Change in WSRS score of the NLF at 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after final injection compared to baseline. Score 1-5, Higher scores are a worse outcome. | Up to 24 months after final injection |
| Mean WSRS of <2 at each follow-up time | Proportion of subjects with a mean WSRS of <2 at each follow-up time point at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after final injection. | Up to 24 months after final injection |
| Time to at least one grade improvement in mean WSRS and time to mean WSRS <2. | Time to at least one grade improvement in mean WSRS and time to mean WSRS <2. | Up to 24 months after final injection |
| Change Face-Q score of Nasolabial Fold | Change in FACE-Q score of the NLF at 6, 12, and 24 months after final injection compared to baseline. Scores 1-4: high scores better outcome | Up to 24 months after final injection |
| Change in Global Aesthetic in Improvement Scale | Change in Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) scores evaluated by the subject, the investigator and a blinded assessor from 2D facial digital imaging at 6, 12, and 24 months after final injection compared to baseline. Scale 1-5; High scores worse outcome | Up to 24 months after final injection |
| Subject Satisfaction Scores | Assessment of Subject Satisfaction Scores at 6, 12, and 24 months after final injection. Scale 1-5; High scores better outcome | Up to 24 months after final injection |
| Stockholm |
| Sweden |