In Zanzibar, around 22,000 children (4% of those aged 6 to 12) need treatment for eye issues like conjunctivitis or require glasses. A 2017 study found that 42% of rural children needing glasses didn't have them. Many locals distrust Western medicine and prefer traditional remedies, rejecting public health efforts such as posters and brochures.

Globally, eye health promotion has been underfunded and overlooked. Research suggests community-designed interventions and behavior change studies are needed to promote sustainable eye health practices. Arts-based interventions using traditional storytelling and performances have been effective in Africa, improving health outcomes in areas like food hygiene and mental health. Health campaigns in schools might be less effective since parents make health decisions for their children.

This study aims to see how well using both traditional and modern music performances in an eye health education program can break down cultural barriers and increase children's use of eye health services in schools and communities. The investigators want to answer three main questions:

1. How effective is a 6-month music-based eye health education program in schools and communities at improving eye health knowledge and service use among parents and children?
2. What factors influenced the success of the 6-month music-based eye health education program?
3. What are the costs and benefits of this 6-month program in increasing eye health service use among children in schools and communities?

Problem: Zanzibar has about 22,000 children (4% of 6-to-12-year-old children) needing conjunctivitis treatment or spectacle correction (Ministry of Health, unpublished report). A 2017-case study showed that about 42% of children in rural Zanzibar communities who needed a pair of glasses did not have them.(1) Local stakeholders engagement revealed that underlying suspicions of Western medicine and public health initiatives led people to continue using traditional, less effective healing methods. Although health posters and brochures have successfully increased service uptake in other contexts,(2) our engagement with stakeholders revealed rejection of such initiatives among the Zanzibari community, such as when the posters were removed or vandalized.

Worldwide, eye health promotion has received limited attention and funding.(2) A Cochrane review(3) and The Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health(4) suggested that behavior change and co-design studies are needed to provide evidence on promoting sustainable behavior changes among the community and children with eye problems. Health-focused arts-based interventions have been shown to catalyze behavioral changes in Africa because they are built on traditional oral and performance methods.(5) A review(6) has shown that traditional music incorporated into health promotion campaigns to improve food hygiene, perinatal mental health and Ebola in Gambia yielded highly positive results. Less effective may be health promotion strategies implemented in school settings only because parents are the ultimate decision-makers of health choices for their children.

Research questions: The study aims to explore "the effectiveness of utilizing traditional and modern music performances in an eye health education strategy implemented in school and community settings to reduce socio-cultural barriers and subsequently increase child eye health service uptake". The specific research questions are:

1. How effective is a 6-month arts-based eye health education strategy implemented in school and community settings to improve parents' and children's eye health literacy and eye service uptake?
2. Which factors influenced the uptake of the 6-month arts-based eye health education strategy?
3. What are the cost and benefits of a 6-month arts-based eye health education strategy on improving eye health service uptake among children in school and community settings?

A: Assess the effectiveness of a 6-month arts-based eye health education program implemented in school and then community settings to improve parents' and children's eye health literacy and eye service uptake

1. Trained teachers will screen approximately 8000 children in eight intervention schools (with art-based eye health education program) and eight control schools (without any health education program) and refer approximately 400 children with vision <6/12 or/and refractive error (RE) and obvious eye diseases for free ocular management at the local eye clinics (current practice). Teachers in enrolled schools will maintain an eye health register to record the names of children who failed vision screening tests and are then referred for treatment, the reasons for referral, and follow up on which children attended an eye examination at the referral clinics. With an estimated prevalence of children with refractive error and obvious eye diseases of 5%, the investigators will have a sufficient sample size for analysis in this pilot trial.
2. Before the intervention, the investigators will administer a baseline demographic profile survey to all 400 children with refractive error and obvious eye diseases and their parents, 400 children with normal vision and their parents, followed by a baseline knowledge and attitude survey. Children referred for further ocular management will be followed up at Month 3 to determine the proportion of them who have gone for an eye examination at the hospital (baseline uptake rate). The enrolment will begin in Month 4. Subsequently, the eye health education will be broadcasted at intervention schools once during morning assembly, once during recess and once before school on Monday and Friday starting at Month 4. At Month 10, the endline 1 data (children's knowledge and attitude survey, eye health register checks) will be collected to determine follow-up scores and rates.
3. At Month 11, a popular local radio station will broadcast eye health education in the musical form three times a day. At Month 14, the second follow-up data (parents' knowledge and attitude survey, eye health register checks) will be collected to determine endline 2 follow-up scores/rates.
4. The primary outcomes are the change in the proportion of children accessing eye health services and the change in children's and parents' knowledge and attitude scores from baseline and endline 1 and endline 2. The secondary outcomes are the proportion and causes of children failing eye health screening, the proportion of children wearing spectacles during an unannounced visit and the children's self-reported compliance to eye medication treatment.

B: Explore in what ways social, cultural and artistic factors influenced the uptake of the arts-based eye health education strategy

1. Stakeholders involved in the music pieces' co-creation process will be invited to identify and reflect on the achievements, gaps, and barriers between what was intended by them and what was received by the intended audience. Stakeholders include Ministries' representatives, community and religious leaders, artist groups, parents, children, teachers and traditional healers. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted 6 months after the program implementation.
2. A series of small group discussions and individual interviews will be held with various target audiences of the intervention to ascertain responses to the intervention by those not involved in its design. These will include children, their guardians, teachers, health care practitioners, traditional healers, radio broadcasters and cultural workers from the context to determine 'audience reception'.
3. Thematic analysis will be conducted to ascertain (i) the efficacy of the makers' intentionality for the intervention concerning the reception of the pieces in context ('fitness-for-purpose'); (ii) the conceptual impact of the content of the music pieces in terms of the socio-cultural barriers addressed and myths dispelled, and how this intervention has contributed to new and/or existing counter-narratives of eye health; (iii) the reception of the music form of the pieces, including associated with past (heritage), current and aspirational (contemporary) genres and registers, and in what ways such artistic and cultural associations have contributed to the intervention's efficacy.

C: Determine the cost and benefits of a short-term arts-based eye health education strategy on improving eye health service uptake among children to inform upscale investment decisions

1. The investigators will develop a costing tool to (i) identify the main implementing costs, including the time and skills to develop the radio broadcast; (ii) calculate the costs of the intervention's roll-out to schools and the wider community; (iii) determine the costs that the intervention may save in the longer term, such as from absenteeism or treatment made unnecessary because of early treatment.
2. The pilot will enable us to cost the intervention and how affordable it is. By looking at the uptake of the intervention in schools and the community, the investigators can compare the costs and benefits of the strategies. Value is defined as cost relative to benefits, whereas budget impact is about costs only. Both are widely used for healthcare investment decisions in LMIC. This will enable policymakers to assess how affordable the intervention is. Understanding what are given up when a new intervention is funded (what else could have done with these resources) and the return on investment is crucial to helping policymakers decide whether the program is worth the investment.

Inclusion Criteria:

• primary and secondary schools with student school-going rates of approximately 75%
• schools with similar number of boys and girls
• schools within 5km of the nearest eye centres.
• school children who have either an obvious eye disease tested using a pen torch test and/or a presenting distance visual acuity ≤6/12 in either eye, and their parents.

Exclusion Criteria:

• primary and secondary schools with student school-going rates of less than 75%
• schools with imbalance number of boys and girls
• schools above 5km of the nearest eye centres.
• school children who do not have either an obvious eye disease tested using a pen torch test and/or a presenting distance visual acuity ≤6/12 in either eye, and their parents.

Care providers will not be able to know whether the children referred are from intervention not comparator group as they will only receive a generic referral form from the project.