Comparison of Patient Outcomes Between Anesthesia Administered Via Target-controlled Infusion Method and Inhalation Anesthesia Method in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair
Comparison of Patient Outcomes Between Anesthesia Administered Via Target-controlled Infusion Method and Inhalation Anesthesia Method in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Inguinal Hernia Repair
This study compares the effects of anesthesia using target-controlled infusion (TCI) and inhalation methods on pediatric patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. The main outcomes include intraoperative hemodynamic stability and postoperative recovery characteristics. Sixty children were randomized to receive either total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) via the Eleveld model or inhalation anesthesia with sevoflurane. The study aims to evaluate which method is safer and more effective in pediatric surgical anesthesia.
This prospective, randomized, controlled study was conducted to evaluate the effects of two anesthesia techniques-target-controlled infusion using total intravenous anesthesia and inhalation anesthesia-on intraoperative hemodynamic stability and postoperative recovery quality in pediatric patients undergoing elective inguinal hernia repair. A total of 60 patients aged 3 to 12 years were randomly assigned to either the TIVA group, which received propofol via TCI using the Eleveld pharmacokinetic model, or the inhalation group, which received sevoflurane-based anesthesia. Standard monitoring included bispectral index (BIS), oxygen saturation (SpO₂), heart rate, and blood pressure measurements. Recovery was assessed using modified Aldrete scoring. A consistent anesthesia depth (BIS 40-60) and standardized ventilatory strategies were maintained for all participants. The aim of this study is to provide comparative data on the safety, efficacy, and recovery profiles of both anesthesia methods in the context of pediatric surgical care.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: