Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of the clinical investigation is to evaluate the performance, safety and degree of tolerability resulting from the use of the iontophoresis medical device in adult subjects diagnosed with AMD stage 3 (AREDS classification) in one or both eyes.
Lutein is a dietary carotenoid which, together with its isomer zeaxanthin, is the main component of the macular pigment of the retina.
Clinical studies have shown that prolonged oral lutein supplementation is safe and is associated with a reduction in the risk of progression from early to advanced stages of Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD). However, patient compliance, due to daily oral intake of lutein tablets for a prolonged period of life, is still limited. Additionally, an obstacle to oral supplementation is the variable absorption of lutein through the digestive route.
An iontophoresis method for conveying substances into the eye has been known for some time and already used in the treatment of keratoconus. In this case the substance conveyed is Riboflavin.
A medical device is now available with the following intended use: to combat all oxidative pathologies of the retina and macula, and in particular in the prevention of AMD and in the management of the patient during the evolution of the pathology.
The device consists of an iontophoresis system with scleral applicator and an ophthalmic liquid lutein solution, both of which have already obtained the CE mark. The system therefore includes a generator called K-IONO (CE in class IIa) and a kit called IONTORETINA, which includes a sterile 2 ml vial of lutein (CE in class IIb), the forward and return electrode . which consists of a scleral iontophoresis applicator and an ophthalmic liquid solution of lutein. The topical application of lutein has the advantage of improving the patient's compliance with lutein supplementary therapy compared to oral intake of the carotenoid; Furthermore, in situ application would allow high (therapeutic) concentrations of lutein to be reached in the macular area in a very short period of time (hours) compared to oral intake (months). Publicly available clinical data on scleral iontophoresis or lutein supplementation have not demonstrated any safety-related adverse events and at the same time have demonstrated a reduction in the cumulative risk of progression of AMD from intermediate to advanced stages of the disease.
The objective of the clinical investigation is to evaluate the performance, safety and degree of tolerability resulting from the use of the iontophoresis medical device in adult subjects diagnosed with AMD stage 3 (AREDS classification) in one or both eyes.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| BCVA changes | Changes in best distance-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at the End of Study Visit compared to baseline. | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| BCVA changes | Changes in best distance-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at scheduled controls (Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, and Visit 6) compared to baseline | 3, 4, 5 and 6 monhs |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Subjects (male and female), suffering from stage 3 AMD over 55 years of age. 80 eyes belonging to subjects of both sexes who will be recruited with competitive enrollment between the sites involved in the clinical investigation.
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 42122923 | Derived | Rinaldi M, Cennamo G, Passaro ML, Chiosi F, Falco F, D'Alessandro A, Strianese D, Costagliola C. Targeting Macular Pigment in Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration: Oral Supplementation Versus Transscleral Iontophoresis in a Prospective Pilot Study. J Clin Med. 2026 Apr 22;15(9):3188. doi: 10.3390/jcm15093188. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided