Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study explores the efficacy of Ga-68-PentixaFor PET/CT in detecting, assessing treatment response, and monitoring the risk of aggressiveness in indolent B-cell lymphoma. The background introduces CXCR4 and discusses its role in cancer research. Currently, FDG-PET is the primary imaging tool for lymphoma staging, but it lacks diagnostic accuracy for low-grade lymphomas. Ga-68-PentixaFor PET demonstrates promising detection capabilities across various lymphomas, suggesting its potential as a superior imaging modality for low-grade lymphomas.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ga-68-CXCR4 PET/CT in Indolent B-cell Lymphoma | Experimental | Indolent B-cell Lymphoma such as marginal-zone B-cell lymphoma、Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia lymphocytic lymphoma、CLL/SLL、mantle cell lymphoma. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ga-68-CXCR4 | Drug | Ga-68-CXCR4 for PET/CT procedure in Indolent B-cell Lymphoma |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Performance of Ga-68-CXCR4 PET/CT in indolent B cell lymphoma | Detection rate = number of positive scan / total number of scan Sensitivity = number of true positive scan / total number of proven recurrent patient Specificity = number of true negative scan / total number of proven free of disease patient Accuracy = number of (true positive scan + true negative scan) / total number of scan Positive predictive value = number of true positive scan / number of positive scan Negative predictive value = number of true negative scan / number of negative scan | up to 24 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Ga-68-CXCR4 compared to F-18-FDG PET/CT | McNemar test, Two-tailed,P<.05 | up to 24 months |
| Clinical impact of Ga-68-CXCR4 compared to F-18-FDG PET/CT | Treatment plan questionnaires before and after Ga-68-CXCR4 PET/CT |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yu Yi Huang, MD | Contact | +886 28970011 | 1121 | yuyi@kfsyscc.org |
| Cheng Ling Yang, B.Rad. | Contact | +886 28970011 | 1167 | androgyny@kfsyscc.org |
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Koo Foundation Sun Yat-Sen Cancer Center | Recruiting | Taipei | Beitou | 1125019 | Taiwan |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| up to 24 months |
| Prognostic value of Ga-68-CXCR4 PET/CT scan | The correlation between the radiomic features of Ga-68-CXCR4 PET/CT scan and progression free survival. CXCR4 radiomics : Feature extraction was performed with the open-source Python package pyradiomics. For each volume of interest (VOI), including first-order statistics, shape features, grey level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM), grey level run length matrix (GLRLM), grey level size-zone matrix (GLSZM), neighborhood grey level different matrix (NGLDM), and grey level dependence matrix (GLDM). | up to 36 months |