Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The collaborator has no intention to initiate the study at this moment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a prospective, collaborative, mixed-methods study which includes anesthesiology trainees receiving one active intervention - a conversational artificial intelligence (CAI) simulation. The goal is to explore the capability of AI to provide high-fidelity simulations that can ultimately improve how healthcare professionals handle difficult conversations such as disclosing medical errors or mistakes.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| AI Group | Experimental | Participant will be using OpenAI's ChatGPT4o's application. For the purposes of this medical error scenario, the CAI will have a standardized prompt to simulate an upset parent whose child recently had surgery in which there was a medical error involving a tooth injury from an intubation. Following a scripted briefing, simulation will be initiated. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conversational Artificial Intelligence Simulations | Other | Use of Conversational Artificial Intelligence Simulations generate medical scenario. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluate acceptance of Conversational Artificial Intelligence Simulations using Guided Discussion Interview Question Guide | Guided Discussion Interview Question Guide contains 6 questions focusing 3 areas including Attitudes and Opinions, Perceptions and Summation question. All the questions are open-ended questions. | Before simulation |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of Conversational Artificial Intelligence Simulations usability via the System Usability Scale (SUS) | Measured with the System Usability Scale (SUS). The scale has 10 items. Scores ranges from 1-5 (1 = strongly disagree and 5 = strongly agree) | Immediately after simulation |
| Evaluation of Conversational Artificial Intelligence Simulations usability via the User Experience Questionnaire (UEQ-S). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
UEQ-S, includes eight items (four from the pragmatic scales Efficiency, Perspicuity, Dependability, and four from the hedonic scales Stimulation and Novelty). Scores range from -3 (min) to 3 (max) |
| Immediately after simulation |
| Evaluation of the reliability of AI quantitative assessment of non-technical performance compared to expert human assessors | The Anaesthetist Non-Technical Skills (ANTS) tool previously published by Fletcher et al. translated in French. The ANTS scoring system uses four categories assessing task management, teamworking, situation awareness and decision-making (1 to 4 points by categories). The minimum score is 4 and the maximum 16 | immediately after simulation |