Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia | OTHER |
| Istituto Nazionale di Ricovero e Cura per Anziani | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Persons post-stroke suffer from hemiparesis affecting the functional abilities of the controlesional lower limb. Improving walking is therefore a primary rehabilitation goal for such patients. Robotic-Assisted Rehabilitation (RAR, e.g. exoskeletons) and Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) are promising techniques to facilitate the functional recovery after stroke. allowing benefits to be maintained over long term.
Exoskeletons were originally developed for subjects with spinal cord injury where they demonstrated a positive impact on rehabilitation and relative costs. The investigators expect the same trend also for stroke. Based on prior exploratory activities using an overgorund exoskeleton (TWIN_Acta) in gait rehabilitation post stroke, in this project the aim is to merge the potential of an overground exoskeleton and FES to treat the lower limb motor deficits in persons post-stroke, strengthening their residual abilities. Synchronized pairing of the two devices might boost the functional recovery of gait post-stroke by promoting neural reorganization The persons post stroke will undergo 20 gait rehabiliation sessions with the exoskeleton and with FES applied to the lower limb muscles during execution of gait with the aim of improving various gait and quality of life parameters. This experimental intervention will be compared to a control intervention using an exoskeleton alone for gait rehabiltation post stroke.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Exoskeleton plus FES | Experimental | Participants will train gait with an overground exoskeleton and a combined myoelectrically controlled Functional Electrostimulation System (FES) applied to lower limb muscles during execution of gait. |
|
| Exoskeleton | Active Comparator | Participants will train gait with an overground exoskeleton. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combined overground gait exoskeleton and FES applied to lower limb | Device | Gait rehabilitation for persons with stroke, with an overground exoskeleton combined with an electromyographically controlled FES applied to lower limb muscles during gait. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| System Usability scale (SUS) | The SUS assesses Usability and Acceptability of a device. The SUS consists of a 10 item questionnaire with five response options for respondents; from Strongly agree to Strongly disagree. The scores will be normalized to produce a percentile ranking. The higher the percentage the better the tested device is considiered. | At baseline and at post after 4 weeks of intervention |
| Velocity of gait | Gait velocity during 3D gait analysis measured while walking overground over 10 meters. Velocity is measured in meters/second | At baseline, at post after 4 weeks of intervention, at follow up after 8 weeks from the end of intervention |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Motricity Index Lower limb (MI LL) | The motricity index is an ordinal method fo measuring limb strength. Maximum total lower limb score is 99. Scoring goes from 0 no movement to 33 normal power. | At baseline, at post after 4 weeks of intervention, at follow up after 8 weeks from the end of intervention |
| Fugl Meyer Assessment of motor recovery after stroke. Lower limb (FMA LL) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
18 years or older
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tiziana Lencioni, PhD | Contact | 024030 | 8547 | tlencioni@dongnocchi.it |
| Johanna Jonsdottir, PhD | Contact | 024030 | 8840 | jjonsdottir@dongnocchi.it |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Maurizio Ferrarin, PhD | Research Head of Biomedical Technology Department | Principal Investigator |
| Andrea Corsonello, PhD | Research Head of the Neurological Unit | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi IRCCS | Milan | 20148 | Italy |
Data will be available upon request
Preliminary data will be available at the end of the study February 2025
at request to the Principal investigator
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020233 | Gait Disorders, Neurologic |
| D006429 | Hemiplegia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Assessor blind to treatment arm
|
| Overground gait exoskeleton | Device | Gait rehabilitation for persons with stroke, with an overground exoskeleton. |
|
|
The scale evaluates and measures neuromotor recovery in post stroke patients. Items are scored on a 3-point ordinal scale, from 0 cannot perform to score 2 performs fully. Maximum score for lower limb is 34. |
| At baseline, at post after 4 weeks of intervention, at follow up after 8 weeks from the end of intervention |
| Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) | The FAC assesses functional ambulation in patients undergoing physical therapy. The clinician ticks a box of 5 broad categories of walking ability from not being able to walk or needing help from to or more persons to score of 5 if they can walk independently anywhere. | At baseline, at post after 4 weeks of intervention, at follow up after 8 weeks from the end of intervention |
| Stroke Rehabilitation Motivation Scale (7-item SRMS) | The 7-item SRMS was devised from the 28-item SRMS and inquires upon intrinsic and extrinsic motivation domains for rehabilitation. Scores range from 1 to 7 so the total score can range from 7-35 with higher scores indicating higher motivation. | At baseline and at post after 4 weeks of intervention |
| Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) | The impact of fatigue on day-to-day function is measured using the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). This measure is a self-report scale with nine questions answered on a 7-point Likert scale. The FSS score is reported as one total score which is the mean of the nine items. Scores range from 1 to 7 and higher scores indicate greater impact of fatigue on daily life. | At baseline, at post after 4 weeks of intervention, at follow up after 8 weeks from the end of intervention |
| Ashworth scale | The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) is a revised version of the original Ashworth Scale that measures spasticity in patients with lesions to the central nervous system. MAS is an assessment that is used to measure the increase in muscle tone. MAS assigns a grade of spasticity from a 0-4 ordinal scale with higher score indicating more spasticity. The grade is assigned by moving a joint/muscle through a high velocity quick stretch.Spasticity of calf and knee muscles will be tested | At baseline, at post after 4 weeks of intervention, at follow up after 8 weeks from the end of intervention |
| Manual muscle test (MMT) | MMT is a standardized set of assessments that measure muscle strength and function. Score range 0-5, minimum 0, maximum 5/5 meaning normal strength. Strength of calf and knee muscles will be tested. | At baseline, at post after 4 weeks of intervention, at follow up after 8 weeks from the end of intervention |
| Five times sit to stand test (5TStS) | The Five Times Sit to Stand Test measures one aspect of transfer skill. The test provides a method to quantify functional lower extremity strength and/or identify movement strategies a patient uses to complete transitional movements. Patient is timed while standing up and sitting down 5 times in row. | At baseline, at post after 4 weeks of intervention, at follow up after 8 weeks from the end of intervention |
| Timed up and go test (TUG) | The Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) assesses mobility, balance, walking ability, and fall risk. Patient are timed while standing up from a chair walking 3 meters, turning around, walking 3 meters and sitting down again. The patient sits in the chair with his/her back against the chair back. On the command "go," the patient rises from the chair, walks 3 meters at a comfortable and safe pace, turns, walks back to the chair and sits down. Timing begins at the instruction "go" and stops when the patient is seated. | At baseline, at post after 4 weeks of intervention, at follow up after 8 weeks from the end of intervention |
| Two minutes walking test (2MWT) | Walking capcaity is measured with the Participant timed while walking a 30 meter track constantly for 2 minutes. Participants are permitted to use their walking aids if necessary. The distance walked in 2 minutes is recorded and reported in metres | At baseline, at post after 4 weeks of intervention, at follow up after 8 weeks from the end of intervention |
| 10 meter walking test (10MVT) | Walking speed is measured by the timed 10 m Walk Test (10MWT). Participants walk a distance of 10 m at their usual speed with their usual walking aids. Participants are timed while walking 10 meters from a starting point to an end point. Time taken from meter 2 to meter 8. Two repetitions are completed and the average time is used to calcualte walking speed in metres/second. | At baseline, at post after 4 weeks of intervention, at follow up after 8 weeks from the end of intervention |
| The walking handicap scale (WHS) | The walking handicap scale is a questionnaire asking subjective gait skills. The scale goes from 1 to 6, with score 1 being a physiological gait only with a physiotherapist, to score 6 being unrestricted community ambulation gait. | At baseline, at post after 4 weeks of intervention, at follow up after 8 weeks from the end of intervention |
| Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) | the BDI-II is a patient reported outcome that quantifies severity of depression. BDI-II identifies overt behavioral characteristics of depression. Items are on a four-point scale that ranges from 0 to 3. Ratings are summed to provide a total score ranging from 0 - 63. Scores >10 generally meet the threshold for a diagnosis of depression. | At baseline, at post after 4 weeks of intervention, at follow up after 8 weeks from the end of intervention |
| Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) | A questionnaire asking how acceptable and easy to use the technological device is. The theoretical model of UTAUT suggests that the actual use of technology is determined by behavioural intention. The perceived likelihood of adopting the technology is dependent on the direct effect of four key constructs, namely performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence, and facilitating conditions. The UTAUT examines the acceptance of technology, determined by the effects of performance expectancy, effort expectancy, social influence and facilitating conditions. | At baseline and at post after 4 weeks of intervention |
| Report of adverse events | Organized reporting of adverse events occurring during the use of the device | at baseline and at post after 4 weeks of intervention |
| Euro Quality of Life-5 -dimension Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) | EQ-5D-FL is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal.Applicable to a wide range of health conditions and treatments, the EQ-5D health questionnaire provides a simple descriptive profile and a single index value for health status. Measures the 5 dimensions of:
| At baseline, at post after 4 weeks of intervention, at follow up after 8 weeks from the end of intervention |
| Motion parameters derived from the kinematics of the body | Lower limb data will be captured utilizing two wearable Inertia Measurement Units (IMUs) operating at 280 Hz. These IMUs will be placed on both feet to analyze spatio-temporal gait characteristics. Through data processing, deviations from typical movement patterns will be quantified. | At baseline, at post after 4 weeks of intervention, at follow up after 8 weeks from the end of intervention |
| Postural capabilities will be evaluated based on body kinetics | Postural data of the lower limb will be acquired using an optoelectronic system combined with two force plates, sampling at 2000 Hz. Utilizing data processing techniques, deviations from normal postural dynamics will be determined. | At baseline, at post after 4 weeks of intervention, at follow up after 8 weeks from the end of intervention |
| Muscular synergies | Muscle synergies will be extracted from the Electromyography (EMG) envelope of each participant detected during overground gait employing the Non-Negative Matrix Factorization algorithm. Treatment-induced changes in the resemblance of muscle synergies to physiological patterns will be assessed. Module similarity will be gauged through the maximum scalar product of muscle weightings between each participant and the normative reference. Additionally, the activation profile similarity will be measured using the Pearson's correlation coefficient of each module's activation profile. | at baseline, at post after 4 weeks of intervention, at follow up after 8 weeks from the end of intervention |
| Instrumented 2 Minute Walk test (I2MWT) | Changes in the I2MWT will be evaluated through IMU sampling at 280 Hz positioned on the lower back. Deviations from the typical performance observed in healthy subjects will be evaluated. | at baseline, at post after 4 weeks of intervention, at follow up after 8 weeks from the end of intervention |
| Instrumented Timed Up and Go (ITUG) | Changes in the instrumented Timed Up and Go (ITUG) test will be examined. The TUG test will be administered with an IMU sampling at 280 Hz positioned on the lower back. Deviations from the typical performance observed in healthy subjects will be evaluated. | at baseline, at post after 4 weeks of intervention, at follow up after 8 weeks from the end of intervention |
| D010243 | Paralysis |