Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4301210001 | Other Grant/Funding Number | Charles F. Hood Foundation |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Charles H. Hood Foundation | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Youth with epilepsy (YWE) are significantly more likely than their peers without epilepsy to experience isolation, interpersonal victimization, and low relationship satisfaction. This is a serious health concern. Poor social support, real or perceived, is consistently correlated to worsened outcomes in every domain of health-related quality of life. As YWE are two to five times more likely than their peers without epilepsy to develop a mental health condition, poor social support is likely a bidirectional risk factor.
Currently, there are no best practices or recommendations for clinicians or other youth-serving professionals to reference when it comes to improving the perceived social support of YWE specifically.
The research team has drawn from multiple fields of scientific knowledge to develop a novel intervention that aims to provide YWE with knowledge, skills, connections, and positive emotional support that can help them to bolster their support system at every level of the social ecological model (SEM). The proposed study is a pilot of this intervention to test its acceptability and appropriateness according to YWE participants ages 12 to 26. The intervention's impact on participants social-emotional learning skills and the feasibility of expanding the study protocol for use in a large, multisite randomized control trial will also be explored.
The goal of this research study is to help evaluate a new program for young people diagnosed with epilepsy that will build up young people's social opportunities, interpersonal skills, and sources of emotional support. The investigators want to research the impact of this program. From this study, the investigators hope to learn what the program does well, and in what ways it could be improved from the perspective of YWE.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Novel Social-Emotional Learning (SEL) curriculum | Experimental | Participants assigned to this arm will receive Project Dream Team, the new 5 session SEL curriculum for YWE. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Dream Team | Behavioral | Five total sessions, 60-minutes each, with one session every 7 days (+/- 21 days between sessions), Session activities include discussion prompts, interactive learning methods, skill rehearsals, mindfulness / somatic exercises and lecture slides facilitated by a trained facilitator. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility of study processes | Number of sessions attended per participant. | 4 months |
| Acceptability of the intervention | A likert scale will be used to assess satisfaction from 1 to 10 where 10 is highly acceptable and 1 is not acceptable. | 4 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in perceived social support (PSS) | This outcome will be assessed with the Youth Thrive (YT) Framework Survey Part 1: Social Connections and Concrete Supports combine subscales. Each YT subscale includes 10 to 16 individual Likert scale questions. Scores are generated by assigning values of 1 to 5 to the Likert scale (1 = not at all like me, 5 = very much like me) for 'positive items' and an inverse value scale for 'negative items' and then totalling all the items within the subscale. Higher total scores indicate a higher level of PSS. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in social emotional skills and behaviors | The Youth Thrive (YT) Framework Survey Part 2: Youth Resilience, Cognitive and Social-Emotional Competence subscales will be used to assess this outcome. Each YT subscale includes 10 to 16 individual Likert scale questions. Scores are generated by assigning values of 1 to 5 to the Likert scale (1 = not at all like me, 5 = very much like me) for 'positive items' and an inverse value scale for 'negative items' and then totalling all the items within the subscale. Higher total scores indicate a greater depth of knowledge, higher mastery over key skills and more frequent use of prosocial behaviors. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Laurie Douglass, MD | Boston Medical Center, Department of Neurology | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Boston Medical Center, Neurology and remote | Boston | Massachusetts | 02118 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004827 | Epilepsy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
One-group pretest-posttest
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Baseline, 4 months |
| Baseline, 4 months |
| Change in leveraging social support for epilepsy self management | This outcome will be assessed using the 25 subscale items from the Adult Epilepsy Self-Management Measurement Instrument (AESMMI-65). The responses are Likert scale-rated from 0 to 5 for positively phrased items, and inversely scored for negatively phrased items. Each subscale will be scored individually and also totaled for a single composite score. Higher scores indicate higher use of effective epilepsy self-management strategies. | Baseline, 4 months |