Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravitreal topotecan for the treatment of patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment due to proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) or resulting from an open globe injury, and compare the outcomes to those who do no receive intravitreal topotecan. The main objectives it aims to achieve are:
Post-consent, participants will:
Researchers will compare participants who receive intravitreal topotecan for PVR to those who do not to see if there is a significant variability in recurrence of retinal detachment, rate of retinal reattachment and PVR grade 6 months after surgery.
Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) is an acute, sight-threatening condition that occurs after separation of the neurosensory retina from the underlying retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) due to the presence of a retinal break. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) represents growth of ectopic fibrocellular growth on the surface of, within and underneath the retina. PVR is hypothesized to occur secondary to the migration of RPE cells to the peri-retina, leading to a mesenchymal transition into contractile myofibroblasts. PVR affects 5-10% of RRDs and is the most common cause of surgical failure in RRD.
Given that PVR involves a pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic cellular response, adjuvants such as corticosteroids and antimetabolites such as 5-fluorouracil have been attempted in the treatment of this condition. Overall, the efficacy results of these treatments have been mixed, and no standard of care adjuvant therapy has emerged.
Topotecan is a chemotherapeutic agent that acts as a topoisomerase inhibitor. It is most commonly administered intravitreally for patients with refractory or recurrent vitreous seeds from retinoblastoma, and shows high efficacy in this setting. At the same time, intravitreal topotecan administered at doses of 5-30µg has been associated with no ocular or systemic complications or adverse electroretinogram changes. To the best of available knowledge, topotecan has not been administered for the treatment of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Topotecan has anti-inflammatory, anti-proliferative and anti-fibrotic activity that is hypothesized to exhibit high efficacy for the treatment of PVR. In this study, the efficacy and safety of intravitreal topotecan for the treatment of PVR will be investigated.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Participants who received intravitreal topotecan | Experimental | These are the patients who will be receiving intravitreally 20 micrograms of topotecan in a 1cc syringe during surgery, at the post-operative day 7 and at the post-operative day 28. |
|
| Participants who did not received intravitreal topotecan | No Intervention | These patients will not be receiving any intervention. |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Topotecan | Drug | 20 micrograms of intravitreal topotecan given in a 1 cc tuberculin syringe at a concentration of 20 mcg/20mcL. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Recurrence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment secondary to PVR | Investigators will be evaluating whether participant develop a recurrent retinal detachment throughout their follow up after their initial surgery. | 6 months after initial surgery, or last follow-up visit available |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) | Investigators will be measuring the BCVA of participants throughout their follow up and see if they notice any change from surgery time to final follow up | at the pre-operative assessment, and post-operative day1, 7, 28, 56, 84, 126, 168 |
| Variation of PVR grade |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the macula | an OCT of the macula will be taken to evaluate for any retinal changes throughout the study | at the pre-operative assessment, and post-operative day1, 7, 28, 56, 84, 126, 168 |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leo Kim, MD, PhD | Contact | 617-391-5896 | leo_kim@meei.harvard.edu |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Leo Kim, MD, PhD | Massachusetts Eye and Ear | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 33441730 | Background | Ohman T, Gawriyski L, Miettinen S, Varjosalo M, Loukovaara S. Molecular pathogenesis of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):966. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80005-w. | |
| 33441813 | Background | Mysore Y, Del Amo EM, Loukovaara S, Hagstrom M, Urtti A, Kauppinen A. Statins for the prevention of proliferative vitreoretinopathy: cellular responses in cultured cells and clinical statin concentrations in the vitreous. Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 13;11(1):980. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80127-1. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Half of the patients will receive intravitreal topotecan at the time of surgery. Randomization will be done based on a computer-generated list that would randomly allocate each of the 50 participants to being either in the treatment arm or in the control arm, in a particular order. Results will be printed on a card put in sealed envelopes that would be given to each research subject based on the allocation order given by that computer-generated list.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
Investigators will be doing a dilated fundus exam and taking fundus photographies for all participants throughout their follow up time to see if the grade of the PVR changes over time. PVR grade goes from grade A to grade C-Anterior to equator/ C-Posterior to equator (grade C being worse than grade A) |
| at the pre-operative assessment, and post-operative day1, 7, 28, 56, 84, 126, 168 |
| Retinal reattachment rate at month 6 or last follow up | Investigators will be doing a dilated fundus exam and taking fundus photographies for all participants throughout their follow up time to see if the retinal reattaches (whether completely or partially) after surgery | at post-operative day 168 (or last follow-up visit available if the participant did not show up at post-operative day 168) |
| Recurrence of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment due to any cause | Investigators will be measuring the BCVA of participants throughout their follow up and see if they notice any change from surgery time to final follow up | at the pre-operative assessment, and post-operative day1, 7, 28, 56, 84, 126, 168 |
| Number of participants and type of intraoperative or postoperative complications | Any adverse event will be noted during surgery, and at each follow up visit for each participant if applicable. | at time of surgery, and each follow up visit (post-operative day1, 7, 28, 56, 84, 126, 168) |
| 25196769 | Background | Claes C, Lafeta AP. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Dev Ophthalmol. 2014;54:188-95. doi: 10.1159/000360466. Epub 2014 Aug 26. |
| 11906814 | Background | Pastor JC, de la Rua ER, Martin F. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy: risk factors and pathobiology. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2002 Jan;21(1):127-44. doi: 10.1016/s1350-9462(01)00023-4. |
| 22942638 | Background | Sadaka A, Giuliari GP. Proliferative vitreoretinopathy: current and emerging treatments. Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:1325-33. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S27896. Epub 2012 Aug 14. |
| 28844050 | Background | Rao R, Honavar SG, Sharma V, Reddy VAP. Intravitreal topotecan in the management of refractory and recurrent vitreous seeds in retinoblastoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018 Apr;102(4):490-495. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310641. Epub 2017 Aug 26. |
| 33972235 | Background | Bogan CM, Kaczmarek JV, Pierce JM, Chen SC, Boyd KL, Calcutt MW, Bridges TM, Lindsley CW, Nadelmann JB, Liao A, Hsieh T, Abramson DH, Francis JH, Friedman DL, Richmond A, Daniels AB. Evaluation of intravitreal topotecan dose levels, toxicity and efficacy for retinoblastoma vitreous seeds: a preclinical and clinical study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2022 Feb;106(2):288-296. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318529. Epub 2021 May 10. |
| 32665221 | Background | Nadelmann J, Francis JH, Brodie SE, Muca E, Abramson DH. Is intravitreal topotecan toxic to retinal function? Br J Ophthalmol. 2021 Jul;105(7):1016-1018. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316588. Epub 2020 Jul 14. |
| 24789622 | Background | Ghassemi F, Shields CL, Ghadimi H, Khodabandeh A, Roohipoor R. Combined intravitreal melphalan and topotecan for refractory or recurrent vitreous seeding from retinoblastoma. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Aug;132(8):936-41. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.414. |
| 12882951 | Background | Cepeda MS, Boston R, Farrar JT, Strom BL. Comparison of logistic regression versus propensity score when the number of events is low and there are multiple confounders. Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Aug 1;158(3):280-7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwg115. |
| 24605197 | Background | Kim J, Shin W. How to do random allocation (randomization). Clin Orthop Surg. 2014 Mar;6(1):103-9. doi: 10.4055/cios.2014.6.1.103. Epub 2014 Feb 14. |
| 1867299 | Background | Machemer R, Aaberg TM, Freeman HM, Irvine AR, Lean JS, Michels RM. An updated classification of retinal detachment with proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991 Aug 15;112(2):159-65. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)76695-4. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018630 | Vitreoretinopathy, Proliferative |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012164 | Retinal Diseases |
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D019772 | Topotecan |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002166 | Camptothecin |
| D000470 | Alkaloids |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided